What does a degree in geology actually mean? A systematic evaluation of courses required to earn a bachelor of science in geology in the United States

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Geoscience Education Pub Date : 2022-05-25 DOI:10.1080/10899995.2022.2076201
Annie Klyce, K. Ryker
{"title":"What does a degree in geology actually mean? A systematic evaluation of courses required to earn a bachelor of science in geology in the United States","authors":"Annie Klyce, K. Ryker","doi":"10.1080/10899995.2022.2076201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Calls have been made to determine optimal learning progressions for geology students so that best practices for teaching content knowledge and skills during an undergraduate degree can be determined. To address these calls, there first needs to be understanding of what courses are required. This study was conducted to provide a systematic evaluation of courses currently required to earn a bachelor of science degree in the field of geology. Once qualifying programs were determined using the American Geoscience Institute’s Directory of Geoscience Departments, an inductive content analysis was used to determine categories representative of the most commonly required geology courses. Testing with an expert panel showed this binning system and codebook to have an interrater reliability (Fleiss’ kappa) of 0.908, demonstrating that they can be applied reliably in future research to assess longitudinal changes in course requirements. The seven most commonly required courses include structure, sedimentology/stratigraphy, introductory courses, general field methods courses, introductory level historical geology courses, mineralogy and petrology. On average, 12.69 geology courses are required for a B.S. degree. A longitudinal comparison is also made here to highlight changes since Drummond and Markin’s (2008) review, which include an increase in the frequency at which introductory, upper level seminar, research based and general field methods courses are required. The results presented provide a snapshot of the current state of the field, and allow for comparisons with content knowledge deemed a priority by the Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education Report.","PeriodicalId":35858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geoscience Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geoscience Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2022.2076201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Calls have been made to determine optimal learning progressions for geology students so that best practices for teaching content knowledge and skills during an undergraduate degree can be determined. To address these calls, there first needs to be understanding of what courses are required. This study was conducted to provide a systematic evaluation of courses currently required to earn a bachelor of science degree in the field of geology. Once qualifying programs were determined using the American Geoscience Institute’s Directory of Geoscience Departments, an inductive content analysis was used to determine categories representative of the most commonly required geology courses. Testing with an expert panel showed this binning system and codebook to have an interrater reliability (Fleiss’ kappa) of 0.908, demonstrating that they can be applied reliably in future research to assess longitudinal changes in course requirements. The seven most commonly required courses include structure, sedimentology/stratigraphy, introductory courses, general field methods courses, introductory level historical geology courses, mineralogy and petrology. On average, 12.69 geology courses are required for a B.S. degree. A longitudinal comparison is also made here to highlight changes since Drummond and Markin’s (2008) review, which include an increase in the frequency at which introductory, upper level seminar, research based and general field methods courses are required. The results presented provide a snapshot of the current state of the field, and allow for comparisons with content knowledge deemed a priority by the Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education Report.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地质学学位到底意味着什么?对获得美国地质学理学学士学位所需课程的系统评估
摘要呼吁确定地质学学生的最佳学习进度,以便确定在本科学位期间教授内容知识和技能的最佳实践。要解决这些问题,首先需要了解需要哪些课程。这项研究旨在对目前获得地质领域理学学士学位所需的课程进行系统评估。一旦使用美国地球科学研究所的地球科学系目录确定了合格课程,就使用归纳内容分析来确定最常见的地质学课程类别。一个专家小组的测试表明,这种装箱系统和代码簿的评估者间可靠性(Fleiss’kappa)为0.908,表明它们可以在未来的研究中可靠地应用,以评估课程需求的纵向变化。七门最常见的必修课包括结构、沉积学/地层学、入门课程、一般野外方法课程、入门级历史地质学课程、矿物学和岩石学。平均而言,获得学士学位需要12.69门地质学课程。这里还进行了纵向比较,以强调自Drummond和Markin(2008)审查以来的变化,其中包括需要入门、高级研讨会、基于研究和一般实地方法课程的频率增加。所提供的结果提供了该领域现状的快照,并允许与《未来本科生地球科学教育报告》认为优先考虑的内容知识进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geoscience Education
Journal of Geoscience Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geoscience Education (JGE) is a peer-reviewed publication for geoscience education research, and serves as an international forum for research concerning the pedagogy, assessment, and philosophy of teaching and learning about the geosciences and related domains. JGE is a publication of the National Association of Geoscience Teachers, a non-profit, member-driven organization that supports a diverse, inclusive, and thriving community of educators and education researchers to improve teaching and learning about the Earth.
期刊最新文献
Impact of a place-based educational approach on student and community members’ experiences and learning within a post-secondary GIS course Student and public perceptions of stormwater runoff and its impact on public health in a Southern California coastal community The Food-Energy-Water Nexus: Assessing undergraduate students’ decision making about complex socio-hydrologic issues supported by Hydroviz A case study of HyFlex in GIS classes at the University of Illinois Patterns in student self-reported situational interest in online introductory geoscience labs during COVID
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1