The Laboratory of Scientific Racism: India and the Origins of Anthropology

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Annual Review of Anthropology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-024344
L. Weaver
{"title":"The Laboratory of Scientific Racism: India and the Origins of Anthropology","authors":"L. Weaver","doi":"10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-024344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthropology, especially biological anthropology, owes its origins to the scientific study of human racial differences. That dark history is well-acknowledged and, when it is taught, usually begins with the racism of early figures, such as Johann Friedrich Blumenbach or, more recently, Ernest Hooton, and exonerates itself through a turn toward antiracist scholars such as Frank Livingstone and Franz Boas. Rarely, if ever, is this origin story critically appraised. This article aims to complicate the origin story of biological anthropology by examining how colonial subjects were involved in the development, testing, and refinement of racial theory, and thus of biological anthropology itself. Taking India as an example, I trace how Indians and the caste system were first the subjects and eventually the interlocutors of racial scientific theory and testing. This reorientation, I argue, is important for developing a more expansive and accurate version of the discipline's history and also for shining a light on its relevance to contemporary global racial conflict. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Anthropology Volume 51 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":48296,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-024344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Anthropology, especially biological anthropology, owes its origins to the scientific study of human racial differences. That dark history is well-acknowledged and, when it is taught, usually begins with the racism of early figures, such as Johann Friedrich Blumenbach or, more recently, Ernest Hooton, and exonerates itself through a turn toward antiracist scholars such as Frank Livingstone and Franz Boas. Rarely, if ever, is this origin story critically appraised. This article aims to complicate the origin story of biological anthropology by examining how colonial subjects were involved in the development, testing, and refinement of racial theory, and thus of biological anthropology itself. Taking India as an example, I trace how Indians and the caste system were first the subjects and eventually the interlocutors of racial scientific theory and testing. This reorientation, I argue, is important for developing a more expansive and accurate version of the discipline's history and also for shining a light on its relevance to contemporary global racial conflict. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Anthropology Volume 51 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学种族主义实验室:印度和人类学的起源
人类学,尤其是生物人类学,其起源应归功于对人类种族差异的科学研究。这段黑暗的历史是公认的,当它被教授时,通常从早期人物的种族主义开始,比如约翰·弗里德里希·布鲁门巴赫,或者最近的欧内斯特·胡顿,然后通过转向弗兰克·利文斯通和弗朗茨·博阿斯等反种族主义学者来为自己开脱。这个原创故事很少被批判性地评价。本文旨在通过考察殖民主体如何参与种族理论以及生物人类学本身的发展、检验和完善,从而使生物人类学的起源故事复杂化。以印度为例,我追溯了印度人和种姓制度是如何首先成为种族科学理论和测试的对象,最终成为对话者的。我认为,这种重新定位对于发展一个更广泛、更准确的学科历史版本非常重要,对于揭示它与当代全球种族冲突的相关性也很重要。预计《人类学年度评论》第51卷的最终在线出版日期是2022年10月。修订后的估计数请参阅http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Well-Being Within and Beyond the Body: Toward Careful Planetary Engagements Toward an Anthropology of Self-Care Anthropology of and from the Ocean Locating the State: Between Region and History Conspiracy Theories as Productive Practices: Toward a Theory of Conspiratorial Style, Agency, and Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1