Knowledge Valorisation in Doctoral Studies in Latvia: Entrepreneurship and the Development of Research Competencies in the Study Process

Q4 Social Sciences Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.15388/actpaed.2021.47.13
Agnese Slišāne, Gatis Lāma, Māra Bernande
{"title":"Knowledge Valorisation in Doctoral Studies in Latvia: Entrepreneurship and the Development of Research Competencies in the Study Process","authors":"Agnese Slišāne, Gatis Lāma, Māra Bernande","doi":"10.15388/actpaed.2021.47.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to analyse the self-assessment data of Latvian doctoral students relating to their entrepreneurship and research competencies and to explore how it correlates and what can be done to promote valorisation during the study process.An online survey using the QuestionPro platform was used to collect the data. The survey was fully completed by 43 doctoral students from various higher education institutions, and it consisted of 123 statements in which doctoral students assessed their competencies on a 7-point Likert scale. Five structured interviews were conducted in order to identify the supporting environment and other aspects that have an impact on the development of entrepreneurship and research competencies.The results of the research demonstrate a relatively low self-assessment of entrepreneurship competencies, which points to why doctoral students are unable to commercialise their knowledge. Unlike entrepreneurship competencies, research competencies can be considered as very high. According to the data, there is no clear correlation between entrepreneurship competence and research competence. The results also point to the fact that it is not sufficient to develop only one of the two competencies to ensure the valorisation of knowledge.For data to be fully representative, a higher number of respondents would have been desirable as well as a greater diversity of study programs represented, assuming that knowledge valorisation approaches and opportunities differ across sectors.Nonetheless, the results can be used for the development and implementation of the valorisation initiatives of higher education institutions.","PeriodicalId":36797,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/actpaed.2021.47.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the self-assessment data of Latvian doctoral students relating to their entrepreneurship and research competencies and to explore how it correlates and what can be done to promote valorisation during the study process.An online survey using the QuestionPro platform was used to collect the data. The survey was fully completed by 43 doctoral students from various higher education institutions, and it consisted of 123 statements in which doctoral students assessed their competencies on a 7-point Likert scale. Five structured interviews were conducted in order to identify the supporting environment and other aspects that have an impact on the development of entrepreneurship and research competencies.The results of the research demonstrate a relatively low self-assessment of entrepreneurship competencies, which points to why doctoral students are unable to commercialise their knowledge. Unlike entrepreneurship competencies, research competencies can be considered as very high. According to the data, there is no clear correlation between entrepreneurship competence and research competence. The results also point to the fact that it is not sufficient to develop only one of the two competencies to ensure the valorisation of knowledge.For data to be fully representative, a higher number of respondents would have been desirable as well as a greater diversity of study programs represented, assuming that knowledge valorisation approaches and opportunities differ across sectors.Nonetheless, the results can be used for the development and implementation of the valorisation initiatives of higher education institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉脱维亚博士研究中的知识价值:创业与研究过程中研究能力的发展
本文的目的是分析拉脱维亚博士生的自我评估数据,这些数据与他们的创业和研究能力有关,并探讨它们之间的相关性,以及在学习过程中可以做些什么来促进增值。使用QuestionPro平台进行的在线调查用于收集数据。这项调查由来自不同高等教育机构的43名博士生全面完成,共有123份声明,其中博士生用7分的Likert量表评估了自己的能力。进行了五次结构化访谈,以确定对创业和研究能力发展有影响的支持环境和其他方面。研究结果表明,对创业能力的自我评估相对较低,这也说明了为什么博士生无法将他们的知识商业化。与创业能力不同,研究能力可以被认为是非常高的。数据显示,创业能力与研究能力之间没有明显的相关性。研究结果还表明,仅仅培养两种能力中的一种是不够的,以确保知识的价值。为了使数据具有充分的代表性,假设不同部门的知识增值方法和机会不同,那么更高数量的受访者以及所代表的研究项目的多样性是可取的。尽管如此,研究结果可用于制定和实施高等教育机构的增值举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia
Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lietuvos bendrojo ugdymo mokyklų organizacinės kultūros adaptyvumo charakteristikos raiška The Unveiling the Faces of Corruption in Education: A Systematic Review of Various Forms of Corruption across Countries and Educational Levels (Ne)susvetimėjimas Lietuvos mokyklose: keturių abiturientų atvejų analizė Teacher Stress and Free Time as a Space for Dealing with Stress Volunteers Experiences for the Future of Disaster Education: Empowering Communities, Addressing Challenges, and Charting a Resilient Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1