Determinants for disclosure of the key audit matters in non-financial companies of B3

Lauren Dal Bem Venturini, Pedro Alberto Barbetta, José Alonso Borba, L. Flach
{"title":"Determinants for disclosure of the key audit matters in non-financial companies of B3","authors":"Lauren Dal Bem Venturini, Pedro Alberto Barbetta, José Alonso Borba, L. Flach","doi":"10.16930/2237-7662202333902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research analyzes the determinants of the quantity of key audit matters (KAM) reported in audit reports from 2016 to 2019 of the non-financial companies listed on B3. The longitudinal regression model for panel data - Poisson’s Log-Linear was applied to an annual sample of at least 272 companies, resulting in 1,198 reports and 3,295 KAM (dependent variable), considering as explanatory variables the aspects of the auditor, the auditee, and corporate governance mechanisms. The findings demonstrate that being audited by the big four is negatively associated with the quantity of KAM. This may be due to the big four or not reporting the same mean number of KAMs per company. Auditors of larger companies, less profitable and with greater operational risk, disclose more KAM, probably aiming to ensure their independence. The audit committees were not statistically significant, not impacting the quantity of KAM reported. The results contribute to the literature on factors that affect the disclosure of KAM in a non-European context (Bepari et al., 2022) with four years of data, and to companies, auditors, and regulatory and supervisory bodies, through Poisson’s multilevel regression, which is an appropriate approach for structured counting data in clusters of relatively similar observations (panels). This advances the studies by Ferreira and Morais (2020) and Guedes et al. (2021), who used ordinary least squares (OLS), and Colares et al. (2020), who used the Chi-square test in one- or two-year analyses of characteristics that tend to establish the quantity of KAM in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":30684,"journal":{"name":"Revista Catarinense da Ciencia Contabil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Catarinense da Ciencia Contabil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662202333902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research analyzes the determinants of the quantity of key audit matters (KAM) reported in audit reports from 2016 to 2019 of the non-financial companies listed on B3. The longitudinal regression model for panel data - Poisson’s Log-Linear was applied to an annual sample of at least 272 companies, resulting in 1,198 reports and 3,295 KAM (dependent variable), considering as explanatory variables the aspects of the auditor, the auditee, and corporate governance mechanisms. The findings demonstrate that being audited by the big four is negatively associated with the quantity of KAM. This may be due to the big four or not reporting the same mean number of KAMs per company. Auditors of larger companies, less profitable and with greater operational risk, disclose more KAM, probably aiming to ensure their independence. The audit committees were not statistically significant, not impacting the quantity of KAM reported. The results contribute to the literature on factors that affect the disclosure of KAM in a non-European context (Bepari et al., 2022) with four years of data, and to companies, auditors, and regulatory and supervisory bodies, through Poisson’s multilevel regression, which is an appropriate approach for structured counting data in clusters of relatively similar observations (panels). This advances the studies by Ferreira and Morais (2020) and Guedes et al. (2021), who used ordinary least squares (OLS), and Colares et al. (2020), who used the Chi-square test in one- or two-year analyses of characteristics that tend to establish the quantity of KAM in Brazil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B3非金融公司关键审计事项披露的决定因素
本研究分析了B3级非金融公司2016 - 2019年审计报告中关键审计事项(KAM)数量的决定因素。面板数据的纵向回归模型-泊松对数线性应用于至少272家公司的年度样本,产生1,198份报告和3,295个KAM(因变量),考虑到审计师,被审计方和公司治理机制方面的解释变量。研究结果表明,接受四大审计与KAM的数量呈负相关。这可能是由于四大会计师事务所报告的每家公司的平均kam数量不同。利润较低、经营风险较大的大公司的审计师披露更多的KAM,可能是为了确保其独立性。审计委员会不具有统计显著性,不影响报告的KAM数量。这些结果有助于研究在非欧洲背景下影响KAM披露因素的文献(Bepari等人,2022年),并通过泊松的多层次回归,对公司、审计师和监管机构做出贡献,泊松的多层次回归是在相对相似的观察(面板)集群中结构化计数数据的适当方法。这推动了Ferreira和Morais(2020)以及Guedes等人(2021)的研究,他们使用普通最小二乘法(OLS),以及Colares等人(2020)的研究,他们在一年或两年的特征分析中使用卡方检验,这些特征倾向于确定巴西KAM的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transparência e Legibilidade dos Demonstrativos Contábeis do Governo do Estado do Ceará em tempos de Pandemia da Covid-19 Transparency and Readability of the Financial Statements of the Ceará Government during the Covid-19 Pandemic Transparência e Legibilidade dos Demonstrativos Contábeis do Governo do Estado do Ceará em tempos de Pandemia da Covid-19 Sistema de Avaliação de Desempenho Performance Appraisal System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1