Procedure in absentia in criminal proceedings for legalization (laundering) of taxes derived from crime

Serhiy Trach, Oleksandr Nahorniuk-Danyliuk, Sergii Rossokha, D. Shumeiko, Yurii Yermakov
{"title":"Procedure in absentia in criminal proceedings for legalization (laundering) of taxes derived from crime","authors":"Serhiy Trach, Oleksandr Nahorniuk-Danyliuk, Sergii Rossokha, D. Shumeiko, Yurii Yermakov","doi":"10.46398/cuestpol.4177.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article was aimed at analyzing the characteristics of the procedure for conducting a special investigation (in absentia) in criminal proceedings concerning the legalization (laundering) of criminally obtained taxes. Attention is drawn to the fact that the concepts of \"special criminal procedure\", \"special pre-trial investigation\", \"special court procedure\" are not formulated by the legislator, but the legal norms concerning their practical implementation are found in various parts of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. It is understood that in the procedural decision to clarify the concept of \"special criminal procedure\" it is necessary to be guided by the general concept of \"criminal procedure\" with characteristic features for the special criminal procedure. It was concluded about the imperfection of the legislative provisions regulating the matter under consideration, in particular, the basic concepts establishing the basis for their application, what procedural acts should be performed in the absence of the accused? What is the procedural term of such an investigation? This question is not defined. The proposed changes to the legislation are aimed at improving the procedural order of a pre-trial investigation in criminal proceedings related to the legalization of taxes obtained by criminal means.","PeriodicalId":40854,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Politicas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Politicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article was aimed at analyzing the characteristics of the procedure for conducting a special investigation (in absentia) in criminal proceedings concerning the legalization (laundering) of criminally obtained taxes. Attention is drawn to the fact that the concepts of "special criminal procedure", "special pre-trial investigation", "special court procedure" are not formulated by the legislator, but the legal norms concerning their practical implementation are found in various parts of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. It is understood that in the procedural decision to clarify the concept of "special criminal procedure" it is necessary to be guided by the general concept of "criminal procedure" with characteristic features for the special criminal procedure. It was concluded about the imperfection of the legislative provisions regulating the matter under consideration, in particular, the basic concepts establishing the basis for their application, what procedural acts should be performed in the absence of the accused? What is the procedural term of such an investigation? This question is not defined. The proposed changes to the legislation are aimed at improving the procedural order of a pre-trial investigation in criminal proceedings related to the legalization of taxes obtained by criminal means.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犯罪所得税合法化(洗钱)刑事诉讼的缺席程序
本文旨在分析在涉及刑事所得税合法化(洗钱)的刑事诉讼中进行特别调查(缺席)的程序的特点。值得注意的是,“特别刑事程序”、“特别审前调查”和“特别法庭程序”的概念不是由立法者制定的,但有关其实际执行的法律规范载于《乌克兰刑事诉讼法》的各个部分。据了解,在明确“特别刑事程序”概念的程序决定中,有必要以具有特别刑事程序特征的“刑事程序”的一般概念为指导。结论是,关于所审议事项的立法规定不完善,特别是建立适用基础的基本概念,在被告缺席的情况下应采取哪些程序行为?这种调查的程序术语是什么?这个问题没有定义。拟议的立法修改旨在改善与刑事手段所得税合法化有关的刑事诉讼中审前调查的程序秩序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuestiones Politicas
Cuestiones Politicas POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
42.90%
发文量
154
期刊最新文献
Financial responsibility of the state: a comparative analysis of the European countries’ approaches in peacetime and wartime The system of political education as an institute for the professionalization of politics Recognition and normative reconstruction as a theory of justice in Axel Honneth Legislative Support Standards in the European Union in the Field of Building a System of Local Self-Government Features of the Functioning of the Legal System in the Context of Digitalization Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1