Dialogue in the Philosophical and Educational Postmodern View

Halyna Zhukova, Olha Vashevich, O. Patlaichuk, Tetiana Shvets, N. Torchynska, Iryna Maidaniuk
{"title":"Dialogue in the Philosophical and Educational Postmodern View","authors":"Halyna Zhukova, Olha Vashevich, O. Patlaichuk, Tetiana Shvets, N. Torchynska, Iryna Maidaniuk","doi":"10.18662/po/13.2/455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the modern assimilations of the definition ‘dialog’ and its rendering by the world academic community. Attention is drawn to the exceptional empirical significance of dialogics as a general scientific universal. The etymology of dialogue as a key category of philosophical, educational and pedagogical knowledge is identified. The evolution of the lead notionalists` ideas about the kernel and nature of dialogue that are relevant of the humanity itself, human mind and constant search of true knowledge is studied. A parallel is drawn between Socratic dialogue and dialogue in the postmodern educational and philosophic discourse. The problem of the antique thinkers` understanding of dialogue is studied discretely. The contemporary approaches to the fundamentals of dialogism, as outlined in the works of the lead theorists, are studied from the antiqueness to these days. It is highlighted how relevant and applicable for educational philosophy of the XXI century ‘G. Skovoroda`s dialogues’ are. It is ascertained that setting dialogue as autonomous subject of research of a particular school of thought reaches the works of L. Feuerbach with its thesis origins, but gets its final formulization in the works of M. Buber. The author dwells on the main theses of the approach of M. Bakhtin about the dialogic sources of the human beingness. The content and scope of the concepts ‘dialogical pedagogics’, ‘interactive dialogue’, ‘egalitarian dialogue’ are analysed. The advantages and disadvantages of the idea ‘knowledge building’ are studied. It is accentuated that the origins of many contemporary dialogue theories and methodologies date back to the ancient times and represent the attempts to integrate the ‘Socratic dialogue’ into the postmodern discourse. The state of adaptedness and conformance of the contemporary theories of dialogue to challenges of digitalisation and globalisation of the postmodern educational-philosophical space is studied.","PeriodicalId":44010,"journal":{"name":"Postmodern Openings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postmodern Openings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.2/455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyses the modern assimilations of the definition ‘dialog’ and its rendering by the world academic community. Attention is drawn to the exceptional empirical significance of dialogics as a general scientific universal. The etymology of dialogue as a key category of philosophical, educational and pedagogical knowledge is identified. The evolution of the lead notionalists` ideas about the kernel and nature of dialogue that are relevant of the humanity itself, human mind and constant search of true knowledge is studied. A parallel is drawn between Socratic dialogue and dialogue in the postmodern educational and philosophic discourse. The problem of the antique thinkers` understanding of dialogue is studied discretely. The contemporary approaches to the fundamentals of dialogism, as outlined in the works of the lead theorists, are studied from the antiqueness to these days. It is highlighted how relevant and applicable for educational philosophy of the XXI century ‘G. Skovoroda`s dialogues’ are. It is ascertained that setting dialogue as autonomous subject of research of a particular school of thought reaches the works of L. Feuerbach with its thesis origins, but gets its final formulization in the works of M. Buber. The author dwells on the main theses of the approach of M. Bakhtin about the dialogic sources of the human beingness. The content and scope of the concepts ‘dialogical pedagogics’, ‘interactive dialogue’, ‘egalitarian dialogue’ are analysed. The advantages and disadvantages of the idea ‘knowledge building’ are studied. It is accentuated that the origins of many contemporary dialogue theories and methodologies date back to the ancient times and represent the attempts to integrate the ‘Socratic dialogue’ into the postmodern discourse. The state of adaptedness and conformance of the contemporary theories of dialogue to challenges of digitalisation and globalisation of the postmodern educational-philosophical space is studied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哲学教育后现代视野中的对话
本文分析了世界学术界对“对话”定义的现代吸收及其表现。人们注意到对话学作为一种普遍的科学普遍性具有特殊的经验意义。对话作为哲学、教育和教学知识的一个关键类别,其词源被确定。研究了主要理论家关于对话的核心和性质的思想的演变,这些思想与人类自身、人类心灵和对真实知识的不断探索有关。苏格拉底式对话与后现代教育哲学话语中的对话有着相似之处。对古代思想家对对话的理解问题进行了细致的研究。正如主要理论家的著作中所概述的,对话主义基本原理的当代方法是从反时代到今天进行研究的。它强调了21世纪G教育哲学的相关性和适用性。斯科沃罗达的对话是。可以肯定的是,将对话作为一个特定学派的自主研究主题,在费尔巴哈的著作中有其论文渊源,但在布伯的著作中得到了最终的形式化。本文着重论述了巴赫金关于人的对话来源的主要论述。分析了“对话教育学”、“互动对话”、“平等对话”等概念的内容和范围。研究了“知识建设”思想的优缺点。强调了许多当代对话理论和方法论的起源可以追溯到古代,代表着将“苏格拉底对话”融入后现代话语的尝试。研究了当代对话理论对后现代教育哲学空间数字化和全球化挑战的适应性和顺应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postmodern Openings
Postmodern Openings SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊最新文献
Social Construction of Organization. A New model in Organizational Development The Application of Feed - Forward Neural Network Architecture for Improving Energy Efficiency Philosophical Debates among Children Restructuring Cultural Practices in Transnational Families Prozac-propelled Postmodern Poetry, Partly (I)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1