J. C. Silva, E. L. Cetira Filho, Paulo Goberlânio Barros Silva, F. Costa, V. Sabóia
{"title":"Is dentin biomodification with collagen cross-linking agents effective for improving dentin adhesion? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"J. C. Silva, E. L. Cetira Filho, Paulo Goberlânio Barros Silva, F. Costa, V. Sabóia","doi":"10.5395/rde.2022.47.e23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of collagen cross-linking agents (CCLAs) used in combination with the adhesive technique in restorative procedures. Materials and Methods In this systematic review, the authors followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. An electronic search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and DOSS, up to October 2020. The gray literature was also researched. Only randomized clinical trials were selected. Results The selection process yielded 3 studies from the 838 retrieved. The addition of CCLAs in the retention of restorations increased the number of events. The postoperative sensitivity scores and marginal adaptation scores showed no significant difference between the CCLA and control groups, and the marginal pigmentation scores showed a significant increase in the CCLA group. There were no caries events in any group throughout the evaluation period. Conclusions This systematic review showed that there is no clinical efficacy to justify the use of CCLAs in the protocols performed.","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of collagen cross-linking agents (CCLAs) used in combination with the adhesive technique in restorative procedures. Materials and Methods In this systematic review, the authors followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. An electronic search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and DOSS, up to October 2020. The gray literature was also researched. Only randomized clinical trials were selected. Results The selection process yielded 3 studies from the 838 retrieved. The addition of CCLAs in the retention of restorations increased the number of events. The postoperative sensitivity scores and marginal adaptation scores showed no significant difference between the CCLA and control groups, and the marginal pigmentation scores showed a significant increase in the CCLA group. There were no caries events in any group throughout the evaluation period. Conclusions This systematic review showed that there is no clinical efficacy to justify the use of CCLAs in the protocols performed.
目的评价胶原交联剂(CCLAs)与粘接技术在修复术中的应用效果。材料和方法在本系统综述中,作者遵循了系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目清单。使用PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、LILACS和DOSS进行电子检索,截止到2020年10月。对灰色文献也进行了研究。只选择随机临床试验。结果在筛选过程中,从检索到的838篇文献中筛选出3篇。在保留修复中添加CCLAs增加了事件的数量。CCLA组术后敏感性评分和边缘适应评分与对照组无显著差异,边缘色素沉着评分CCLA组明显升高。在整个评估期间,两组均未发生龋齿事件。结论:本系统综述显示,没有临床疗效证明在所执行的方案中使用CCLAs是合理的。