Evaluación de género de la preferencia de los agricultores de cerdos para la formación de la logística en el uso de la comida de plantas de yuca en dietas para cerdos en Nigeria del suroeste

F.H.B. Folake, M. A. Adeyemi, T. Ojo
{"title":"Evaluación de género de la preferencia de los agricultores de cerdos para la formación de la logística en el uso de la comida de plantas de yuca en dietas para cerdos en Nigeria del suroeste","authors":"F.H.B. Folake, M. A. Adeyemi, T. Ojo","doi":"10.21071/az.v69i266.5112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender has not received much attention in training logistics despite its importance for achieving equal access to information on proven innovations and the uptake by farmers. The paper assessed male and female pig farmers’ preference for training logistics, analysed the proximate composition and cost of cassava plant meal and the common feedstuffs. It determined the levels of awareness in alternative feeds by gender, and discussed farmers’ training constraints. Purposive sampling technique was used to select two States and six Local Government Areas based on the preponderance of pig farmers. Structured interview schedule was administered on 300 pig farmers and 18 key informants identified through snow ball sampling technique. Data were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics. Results include nutritional and cost advantages of cassava plant meal, over 80 % of both gender in their active ages, both gender had high level of awareness in alternative feeds and similarities in preferences for training methods, mode and facilitator. They differ in preferences for training venue, duration, day and time. Results of ANOVA revealed that male and female farmers’ preferences for training logistics differ significantly (p <0.05). In conclusion, farmers’ preference for training logistics was largely determined by cultural diversity in gender relations which if not considered could widen gender gap in access to information on agricultural innovations and hinder improved pig production.","PeriodicalId":40003,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Zootecnia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Zootecnia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v69i266.5112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender has not received much attention in training logistics despite its importance for achieving equal access to information on proven innovations and the uptake by farmers. The paper assessed male and female pig farmers’ preference for training logistics, analysed the proximate composition and cost of cassava plant meal and the common feedstuffs. It determined the levels of awareness in alternative feeds by gender, and discussed farmers’ training constraints. Purposive sampling technique was used to select two States and six Local Government Areas based on the preponderance of pig farmers. Structured interview schedule was administered on 300 pig farmers and 18 key informants identified through snow ball sampling technique. Data were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics. Results include nutritional and cost advantages of cassava plant meal, over 80 % of both gender in their active ages, both gender had high level of awareness in alternative feeds and similarities in preferences for training methods, mode and facilitator. They differ in preferences for training venue, duration, day and time. Results of ANOVA revealed that male and female farmers’ preferences for training logistics differ significantly (p <0.05). In conclusion, farmers’ preference for training logistics was largely determined by cultural diversity in gender relations which if not considered could widen gender gap in access to information on agricultural innovations and hinder improved pig production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚西南部养猪户对在猪饲料中使用木薯植物饲料进行物流培训的偏好的性别评估
在培训后勤方面,性别问题没有得到多少重视,尽管性别问题对于平等获得关于已证实的创新和农民接受的信息很重要。本文评估了男性和女性养猪户对培训物流的偏好,分析了木薯植物粕和常用饲料的大致组成和成本。它按性别确定了对替代饲料的认识水平,并讨论了农民的培训限制。采用有目的抽样技术,根据养猪户的优势选择2个州和6个地方政府区。采用结构化访谈法对300名养猪户和18名关键信息提供者进行问卷调查。对数据进行描述性和推断性统计。结果表明,木薯植物粕的营养和成本优势,超过80%的男女在其活动年龄,对替代饲料的认识水平较高,对培训方法、模式和促进者的偏好相似。他们对训练地点、持续时间、日期和时间的偏好不同。方差分析结果显示,男女农民对培训物流的偏好差异显著(p <0.05)。综上所述,农民对培训物流的偏好在很大程度上取决于性别关系中的文化多样性,如果不考虑这一点,就会扩大农业创新信息获取方面的性别差距,阻碍养猪生产的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos de Zootecnia
Archivos de Zootecnia Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Archivos de Zootecnia is a quarterly, multilingual, international science journal, published by the University of Cordoba and the Asociación Iberoamericana de Zootecnia. The journal was founded in 1952 as the voice for the Zootechnics Institute of the Veterinary Faculty at the University of Cordoba. Its aim is to disseminate results from research into animal production and related areas, giving special attention to farming systems in developing areas, their local breeds and alternative production methods.
期刊最新文献
Rendimiento y valor nutritivo del pasto Brachiaria brizantha cv. “Marandú”, en zonas semiáridas del litoral ecuatoriano Análisis filogenético del gen Spike del virus de la diarrea epidémica porcina en Colombia, 2014-2015 Uso de modelos de ecuaciones estructurales para evaluar el crecimiento de machos de Blanco-Orejinegro bajo control de rendimientos Estudio de las correlaciones entre valores genéticos producción – reproducción y tipo lineal de los toros Holstein en Ecuador Caracterización genética del Ca Rater Mallorquí con microsatélites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1