The Routledge Handbook of Festivals

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI:10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285
David Teevan
{"title":"The Routledge Handbook of Festivals","authors":"David Teevan","doi":"10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tural occupations influences the very art that is composed and presented, which only serves to cement the norms people would hope to dislodge. Further, because it is so competitive to succeed in the cultural sector, those at the top are likely to have convinced themselves that while they may have had some “luck” along the way, they work in a world that is in fact meritocratic; this is true even though their political views lean predominantly to the left. And this is not new; to answer the question posed above, no, there was no golden age, and the arts have never been an engine of social mobility (though there are an exceptional few who do rise from the working class). All of this puts a tremendous burden on women and people from minorities. They can either endure the struggle of trying their best to fit with what is seen in the industry as the somatic norm or face persistent difficulties in finding work or advancement in the field. This sits atop the pressure of knowing that the opportunities for work in the cultural occupations is unequal; our well-being is reduced not only by not gaining the opportunities we hope for, but also for simply knowing it is an unfair contest. It weighs heavily. So, what is to be done? Two things. First, the degree of inequality in the cultural sector must be made visible. The stories of experienced inequality contained in this book, and all the thousands of others with their own experiences, must be told and heard. Those who possess all the advantages of “being the right fit” need deep understanding of the barriers facing those who do not. Second, and this will take longer: the “somatic norms” of the actor, the curator, the book reviewer, the film director, need to change. As that change takes place, the art that is made and presented to us will change, and so will the opportunities for all people to see something of themselves on stage, on the screen, and in the bookshop. Then culture will be good for you. This is the most vital book in cultural affairs I have read in years.","PeriodicalId":45760,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2021.1894285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

tural occupations influences the very art that is composed and presented, which only serves to cement the norms people would hope to dislodge. Further, because it is so competitive to succeed in the cultural sector, those at the top are likely to have convinced themselves that while they may have had some “luck” along the way, they work in a world that is in fact meritocratic; this is true even though their political views lean predominantly to the left. And this is not new; to answer the question posed above, no, there was no golden age, and the arts have never been an engine of social mobility (though there are an exceptional few who do rise from the working class). All of this puts a tremendous burden on women and people from minorities. They can either endure the struggle of trying their best to fit with what is seen in the industry as the somatic norm or face persistent difficulties in finding work or advancement in the field. This sits atop the pressure of knowing that the opportunities for work in the cultural occupations is unequal; our well-being is reduced not only by not gaining the opportunities we hope for, but also for simply knowing it is an unfair contest. It weighs heavily. So, what is to be done? Two things. First, the degree of inequality in the cultural sector must be made visible. The stories of experienced inequality contained in this book, and all the thousands of others with their own experiences, must be told and heard. Those who possess all the advantages of “being the right fit” need deep understanding of the barriers facing those who do not. Second, and this will take longer: the “somatic norms” of the actor, the curator, the book reviewer, the film director, need to change. As that change takes place, the art that is made and presented to us will change, and so will the opportunities for all people to see something of themselves on stage, on the screen, and in the bookshop. Then culture will be good for you. This is the most vital book in cultural affairs I have read in years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳特利奇节日手册
文化职业影响着构成和呈现的艺术,而艺术只会巩固人们希望推翻的规范。此外,由于在文化部门取得成功的竞争如此激烈,那些高层很可能已经说服自己,虽然他们在这一过程中可能有一些“运气”,但他们在一个实际上是精英统治的世界里工作;这是事实,尽管他们的政治观点主要倾向于左翼。这并不是什么新鲜事;要回答上面提出的问题,不,没有黄金时代,艺术从来都不是社会流动的引擎(尽管有少数人确实是从工人阶级中崛起的)。所有这些都给妇女和少数民族人民带来了巨大的负担。他们要么忍受着尽最大努力适应行业中被视为身体规范的斗争,要么在寻找工作或在该领域取得进步方面面临持续的困难。这是因为人们知道文化职业的工作机会是不平等的;我们的幸福感不仅因为没有获得我们希望的机会,而且因为我们知道这是一场不公平的竞争。它很重。那么,该怎么办呢?有两件事。首先,必须让人们看到文化部门的不平等程度。这本书中所包含的经历不平等的故事,以及成千上万其他有自己经历的故事,都必须被讲述和倾听。那些拥有“合适人选”所有优势的人需要深入了解那些不具备这些优势的人所面临的障碍。其次,这需要更长的时间:演员、策展人、书评人、电影导演的“身体规范”需要改变。随着这种变化的发生,制作和呈现给我们的艺术将发生变化,所有人在舞台、屏幕和书店上看到自己的机会也将发生变化。那么文化对你有好处。这是我多年来读过的关于文化事务的最重要的一本书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY
JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: How will technology change the arts world? Who owns what in the information age? How will museums survive in the future? The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society has supplied answers to these kinds of questions for more than twenty-five years, becoming the authoritative resource for arts policymakers and analysts, sociologists, arts and cultural administrators, educators, trustees, artists, lawyers, and citizens concerned with the performing, visual, and media arts, as well as cultural affairs. Articles, commentaries, and reviews of publications address marketing, intellectual property, arts policy, arts law, governance, and cultural production and dissemination, always from a variety of philosophical, disciplinary, and national and international perspectives.
期刊最新文献
The Land of (Almost) No Central Government Arts Spending? Cultural Policy, Protestant Denominations, and the Cultural Policy Singularity of Unites States of America The Beginner’s Guide to Opera Stage Management: Gathering the Tools You Need to Work in Opera Arts and Culture Nonprofits as Civic Actors: Mapping Audience, Community, and Civic Engagement in Nonprofit Organizations Managing Arts Organizations The Advocacy Coalition in the British Film Institute in Its Early Days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1