Self-administered online test of memory functions

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nordic Psychology Pub Date : 2022-05-17 DOI:10.1080/19012276.2022.2074525
J. Launes, Hanna Uurainen, M. Virta, L. Hokkanen
{"title":"Self-administered online test of memory functions","authors":"J. Launes, Hanna Uurainen, M. Virta, L. Hokkanen","doi":"10.1080/19012276.2022.2074525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Online cognitive tests have gained popularity in recent years, but their utility needs evaluation. We reviewed the available information on the reliability and validity measures of tests that were designed to be performed online without supervision. We then compared a newly developed web-based and self-administered memory test to traditional neuropsychological tests. We also studied if familiarity with computers affects the willingness to take the test or the test performance. Five hundred thirty-one healthy individuals, who have a history of a perinatal risk and who have been followed up since birth for the potential long-term consequences, participated in a traditional comprehensive neuropsychological assessment at the age of 40. Of them, 234 also completed an online memory test developed for follow-up. The online assessment and traditional neuropsychological tests correlated moderately (total r = .50, p < .001; subtests r = .21−.45). The mean sum scores did not differ between presentation methods (online or traditional) and there was no interaction between presentation method and sex or education. The experience in using computers did not affect the performance, but subjects who used computers often were more likely to take part in the voluntary online test. Our self-administered online test is promising for monitoring memory performance in the follow-up of subjects who have no major cognitive impairments.","PeriodicalId":51815,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2022.2074525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Online cognitive tests have gained popularity in recent years, but their utility needs evaluation. We reviewed the available information on the reliability and validity measures of tests that were designed to be performed online without supervision. We then compared a newly developed web-based and self-administered memory test to traditional neuropsychological tests. We also studied if familiarity with computers affects the willingness to take the test or the test performance. Five hundred thirty-one healthy individuals, who have a history of a perinatal risk and who have been followed up since birth for the potential long-term consequences, participated in a traditional comprehensive neuropsychological assessment at the age of 40. Of them, 234 also completed an online memory test developed for follow-up. The online assessment and traditional neuropsychological tests correlated moderately (total r = .50, p < .001; subtests r = .21−.45). The mean sum scores did not differ between presentation methods (online or traditional) and there was no interaction between presentation method and sex or education. The experience in using computers did not affect the performance, but subjects who used computers often were more likely to take part in the voluntary online test. Our self-administered online test is promising for monitoring memory performance in the follow-up of subjects who have no major cognitive impairments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我记忆功能在线测试
摘要近年来,在线认知测试越来越受欢迎,但其效用需要评估。我们审查了关于测试的可靠性和有效性测量的可用信息,这些测试旨在在没有监督的情况下在线进行。然后,我们将一种新开发的基于网络的自我管理记忆测试与传统的神经心理学测试进行了比较。我们还研究了对计算机的熟悉程度是否会影响参加考试的意愿或考试成绩。531名健康人有围产期风险史,自出生以来就对其潜在的长期后果进行了随访,他们在40岁时参加了传统的综合神经心理学评估。其中234人还完成了一项为后续研究开发的在线记忆测试。在线评估和传统的神经心理测试具有适度的相关性(总r=.50,p<.001;子测试r=.21−.45)。不同呈现方法(在线或传统)的平均总分没有差异,呈现方法与性别或教育之间没有交互作用。使用电脑的经验不会影响成绩,但经常使用电脑的受试者更有可能参加自愿的在线测试。我们的自我管理在线测试有望在没有重大认知障碍的受试者的随访中监测记忆表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Psychology
Nordic Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Disclosures and social reactions to sexual violence: factor structure of the social reactions questionnaire shortened and sex differences in Iceland With a little coping from my friends: a case study of voice, manager response and collective coping in an organisational context Persistent physical symptoms and mental health problems among individuals seeking work rehabilitation A good enough grip on life in youth To work after retirement: a qualitative study among mental health nursing assistants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1