Travel Management Planning for Wildlife with a Case Study on the Mojave Desert Tortoise

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.3996/jfwm-22-030
Roy C. Averill‐Murray, L. Allison
{"title":"Travel Management Planning for Wildlife with a Case Study on the Mojave Desert Tortoise","authors":"Roy C. Averill‐Murray, L. Allison","doi":"10.3996/jfwm-22-030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Roads are important drivers of habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation that affect global biodiversity. Detrimental effects of roads include direct mortality of individual animals, spread of habitat-altering invasive plants, and loss of demographic and genetic connectivity of wildlife populations. Various measures address the negative effects of roads on wildlife. However, most strategies for minimizing or mitigating the effects of roads are focused on the actual roads themselves rather than on the collective travel network across landscapes. We summarized a growing body of literature that has documented the effects of road density on wildlife populations and the benefits associated with lower densities. This literature supports the application of limits on road density as a viable tool for managing cumulative effects. Based on these examples, we recommend road densities, including all linear features used for travel, < 0.6 km/km2 as a general target for travel management in areas where wildlife conservation is a priority. Lower densities may be necessary in particularly sensitive areas, whereas higher densities may be appropriate in areas less important to landscape-level conservation and wildlife connectivity. Public policy and funding also are needed to address challenges of enforcing off-highway vehicle regulations. In applying this general overview to a case study of the Mojave desert tortoise Gopherus agassizii, we found that all management plans across the species’ range lack considerations of road density and that tortoise populations declined within all conservation areas with road densities > 0.75 km/km2. From this we provide several travel-management recommendations specific to Mojave desert tortoise conservation beginning with identifying the entire travel network within management areas. Specific actions for managing or setting limits for road density depend on the site-specific biological or management context, for instance relative to habitat quality or proximity to designated tortoise conservation areas. In addition, increasing law enforcement and public outreach will improve enforcement and compliance of travel regulations, and installing tortoise-exclusion fencing along highways will reduce road-kills and allow tortoise populations to reoccupy depleted areas adjacent to highways. Implementation of these recommendations would improve the prospects of reversing desert tortoise population declines.","PeriodicalId":49036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-22-030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roads are important drivers of habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation that affect global biodiversity. Detrimental effects of roads include direct mortality of individual animals, spread of habitat-altering invasive plants, and loss of demographic and genetic connectivity of wildlife populations. Various measures address the negative effects of roads on wildlife. However, most strategies for minimizing or mitigating the effects of roads are focused on the actual roads themselves rather than on the collective travel network across landscapes. We summarized a growing body of literature that has documented the effects of road density on wildlife populations and the benefits associated with lower densities. This literature supports the application of limits on road density as a viable tool for managing cumulative effects. Based on these examples, we recommend road densities, including all linear features used for travel, < 0.6 km/km2 as a general target for travel management in areas where wildlife conservation is a priority. Lower densities may be necessary in particularly sensitive areas, whereas higher densities may be appropriate in areas less important to landscape-level conservation and wildlife connectivity. Public policy and funding also are needed to address challenges of enforcing off-highway vehicle regulations. In applying this general overview to a case study of the Mojave desert tortoise Gopherus agassizii, we found that all management plans across the species’ range lack considerations of road density and that tortoise populations declined within all conservation areas with road densities > 0.75 km/km2. From this we provide several travel-management recommendations specific to Mojave desert tortoise conservation beginning with identifying the entire travel network within management areas. Specific actions for managing or setting limits for road density depend on the site-specific biological or management context, for instance relative to habitat quality or proximity to designated tortoise conservation areas. In addition, increasing law enforcement and public outreach will improve enforcement and compliance of travel regulations, and installing tortoise-exclusion fencing along highways will reduce road-kills and allow tortoise populations to reoccupy depleted areas adjacent to highways. Implementation of these recommendations would improve the prospects of reversing desert tortoise population declines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生动物的旅行管理规划——以莫哈韦沙漠龟为例
道路是影响全球生物多样性的栖息地丧失、退化和碎片化的重要驱动因素。道路的有害影响包括动物个体的直接死亡、改变栖息地的入侵植物的传播,以及野生动物种群的人口和基因连接的丧失。各种措施解决了道路对野生动物的负面影响。然而,大多数减少或减轻道路影响的策略都侧重于实际道路本身,而不是跨景观的集体出行网络。我们总结了越来越多的文献,这些文献记录了道路密度对野生动物种群的影响以及与较低密度相关的好处。该文献支持将道路密度限制作为管理累积效应的可行工具。基于这些例子,我们建议将道路密度(包括用于旅行的所有线性特征)<0.6 km/km2作为野生动物保护优先地区旅行管理的一般目标。在特别敏感的地区,较低的密度可能是必要的,而在对景观保护和野生动物连通性不太重要的地区,较高的密度可能更合适。还需要公共政策和资金来应对执行非公路车辆法规的挑战。在对莫哈韦沙漠陆龟Gopherus agassizii进行案例研究时,我们发现该物种范围内的所有管理计划都没有考虑道路密度,并且在道路密度>0.75 km/km2的所有保护区内,陆龟的数量都在下降。由此,我们提供了几个针对莫哈韦沙漠龟保护的旅行管理建议,首先确定管理区域内的整个旅行网络。管理或设定道路密度限制的具体行动取决于特定地点的生物或管理环境,例如与栖息地质量或指定乌龟保护区的接近程度有关。此外,加强执法和公众宣传将提高旅行法规的执行和合规性,在高速公路沿线安装乌龟隔离围栏将减少道路死亡,并使乌龟种群能够重新占领高速公路附近的枯竭地区。执行这些建议将改善扭转沙漠陆龟数量下降的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management encourages submission of original, high quality, English-language scientific papers on the practical application and integration of science to conservation and management of native North American fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats in the following categories: Articles, Notes, Surveys and Issues and Perspectives. Papers that do not relate directly to native North American fish, wildlife plants or their habitats may be considered if they highlight species that are closely related to, or conservation issues that are germane to, those in North America.
期刊最新文献
Strangers in the blind: Identifying appropriate mentees and mentors for waterfowl hunter recruitment Simulation Modeling to Assess Line Transect Distance Sampling Under a Range of Translocation Scenarios Sampling duration and season recommendations for passive acoustic monitoring of bats after white-nose syndrome Striped Bass Morone saxatilis movement in a large southeastern river system Leveraging Angler Effort to Inform Fisheries Management: Using Harvest and Harvest Rate to Estimate Abundance of White Sturgeon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1