Diagnostic value of serum adenosine deaminase in tuberculous lymphadenitis

M. Adhikari, S. M. Arafat, M. Ananna, Md. Atikur Rahman, H. Imam, Shah Mohammad Mohaimenul Haq
{"title":"Diagnostic value of serum adenosine deaminase in tuberculous lymphadenitis","authors":"M. Adhikari, S. M. Arafat, M. Ananna, Md. Atikur Rahman, H. Imam, Shah Mohammad Mohaimenul Haq","doi":"10.3329/bmrcb.v47i2.57773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis often requires FNAC or biopsy of lymph node to reach a final diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis, which is invasive, expensive, and needs an advanced setting. Estimation of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in different body fluid and serum has been suggested as a quick, cheap, and reliable test for tuberculosis.\nObjective: The study was intended to assess the usefulness of serum ADA in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis.\nMethods: This was a cross-sectional observational study, conducted in BSMMU over a two year period and included 68 participants, divided equally into two group e.g. tuberculous lymphadenitis and a healthy comparison group. As tuberculous lymphadenitis, only newly diagnosed cases, labeled on the basis of histopathological findings of epithelioid granuloma with caseation necrosis were included. Serum ADA concentrations were estimated by enzymatic method and compared between groups.\nResults: The mean serum ADA concentration was found to be 25.52±7.11 U/L in tuberculous lymphadenitis group, which was significantly higher (p=0.000) than that of the healthy comparison group (14.82±3.85 U/L). Three different cut-off values of serum ADA (18.25 U/L, 20.45 U/L, 22.15 U/L) were used to determine the best predictive value for the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis. Sensitivity and specificity of these cut off values were 91.2% and 82.4%, 79.4% and 88.2%, 67.6% and 97.1% respectively.\nConclusion: It is clearly denoted by the study that, tuberculous lymphadenitis patients has significant higher serum ADA then the healthy comparison group. This result indicates that serum ADA can be used as a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis with conventional investigations.\nBangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2021; 47(2): 151-155","PeriodicalId":8704,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v47i2.57773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis often requires FNAC or biopsy of lymph node to reach a final diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis, which is invasive, expensive, and needs an advanced setting. Estimation of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in different body fluid and serum has been suggested as a quick, cheap, and reliable test for tuberculosis. Objective: The study was intended to assess the usefulness of serum ADA in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study, conducted in BSMMU over a two year period and included 68 participants, divided equally into two group e.g. tuberculous lymphadenitis and a healthy comparison group. As tuberculous lymphadenitis, only newly diagnosed cases, labeled on the basis of histopathological findings of epithelioid granuloma with caseation necrosis were included. Serum ADA concentrations were estimated by enzymatic method and compared between groups. Results: The mean serum ADA concentration was found to be 25.52±7.11 U/L in tuberculous lymphadenitis group, which was significantly higher (p=0.000) than that of the healthy comparison group (14.82±3.85 U/L). Three different cut-off values of serum ADA (18.25 U/L, 20.45 U/L, 22.15 U/L) were used to determine the best predictive value for the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis. Sensitivity and specificity of these cut off values were 91.2% and 82.4%, 79.4% and 88.2%, 67.6% and 97.1% respectively. Conclusion: It is clearly denoted by the study that, tuberculous lymphadenitis patients has significant higher serum ADA then the healthy comparison group. This result indicates that serum ADA can be used as a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis with conventional investigations. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2021; 47(2): 151-155
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清腺苷脱氨酶对结核性淋巴结炎的诊断价值
背景:肺外结核通常需要FNAC或淋巴结活检才能最终诊断为结核性淋巴结炎,这是侵入性的,昂贵的,需要先进的设置。不同体液和血清中腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)的测定被认为是一种快速、廉价和可靠的结核病检测方法。目的:本研究旨在评估血清ADA在结核性淋巴结炎诊断中的价值。方法:这是一项横断面观察性研究,在BSMMU进行了为期两年的研究,包括68名参与者,平均分为两组,如结核性淋巴结炎组和健康对照组。作为结核性淋巴结炎,仅包括新诊断的病例,根据组织病理学结果标记为上皮样肉芽肿伴干酪样坏死。酶法测定血清ADA浓度并比较各组间差异。结果:结核性淋巴结炎组血清ADA平均浓度为25.52±7.11 U/L,显著高于健康对照组(14.82±3.85 U/L) (p=0.000)。采用血清ADA的3个不同临界值(18.25 U/L、20.45 U/L、22.15 U/L)确定诊断结核性淋巴结炎的最佳预测值。这些截断值的敏感性和特异性分别为91.2%和82.4%、79.4%和88.2%、67.6%和97.1%。结论:本研究明确表明,结核性淋巴结炎患者血清ADA明显高于健康对照组。提示血清ADA可作为常规检查诊断结核性淋巴结炎的辅助手段。孟加拉国地中海理事会2021年公报;47 (2): 151 - 155
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The official publication of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Spinal Fusion in Degenerated Spinal Stenosis, proposing a hybrid scoring system for Bangladesh people in law Sack pain Preoperative Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as a predictor of malignant ovarian tumor Overview of Journals in Developing Countries Cell phone use and Self-reported wellbeing among teenage students of Bangladesh Association of Interleukin-10 Gene Polymorphism with Susceptibility and Severity of Axial Spondyloarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1