Listen to Your Mother: Children Use Hierarchical Social Roles to Guide Their Judgments about People

IF 1.6 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Cognition and Development Pub Date : 2023-02-26 DOI:10.1080/15248372.2023.2176854
Megan N. Norris, Catherine H McDermott, Nicholaus S. Noles
{"title":"Listen to Your Mother: Children Use Hierarchical Social Roles to Guide Their Judgments about People","authors":"Megan N. Norris, Catherine H McDermott, Nicholaus S. Noles","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2023.2176854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social categories are often defined by the boundaries that they form between individuals. However, many social structures describe complementary relationships between individuals, defining both the power that we hold over others and our obligations to them and vice versa. In two studies conducted in the U.S., we investigated a sample of primarily white, middle class children’s intuitions about social roles at ages 4, 5, and 6. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with two informants, one dominant (e.g., a mother) and one subordinate (e.g., a daughter). The informants gave conflicting instructions, and children determined whose instructions should be followed and which informant had more social power. Five- and 6-year-olds, but not 4 -year-olds, used social roles to determine which instructions should be followed, and children in all age groups selected the dominant informant as someone who held social power. In Experiment 2, we explored the breadth of this effect by having the same informants present conflicting information about food. Five- and 6-year-old participants trusted claims made by a dominant informant, but 4-year-olds did not prioritize claims made by either informant. At the same time, when asked who they would approach to learn about a new food, children did not prefer either informant. Together, these findings suggest that children’s understanding of hierarchical social roles emerges at a young age, changes over time, and influences their judgments in nuanced ways.","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition and Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2176854","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social categories are often defined by the boundaries that they form between individuals. However, many social structures describe complementary relationships between individuals, defining both the power that we hold over others and our obligations to them and vice versa. In two studies conducted in the U.S., we investigated a sample of primarily white, middle class children’s intuitions about social roles at ages 4, 5, and 6. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with two informants, one dominant (e.g., a mother) and one subordinate (e.g., a daughter). The informants gave conflicting instructions, and children determined whose instructions should be followed and which informant had more social power. Five- and 6-year-olds, but not 4 -year-olds, used social roles to determine which instructions should be followed, and children in all age groups selected the dominant informant as someone who held social power. In Experiment 2, we explored the breadth of this effect by having the same informants present conflicting information about food. Five- and 6-year-old participants trusted claims made by a dominant informant, but 4-year-olds did not prioritize claims made by either informant. At the same time, when asked who they would approach to learn about a new food, children did not prefer either informant. Together, these findings suggest that children’s understanding of hierarchical social roles emerges at a young age, changes over time, and influences their judgments in nuanced ways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听妈妈的话:孩子用等级社会角色来指导他们对人的判断
社会类别通常由它们在个体之间形成的边界来定义。然而,许多社会结构描述了个体之间的互补关系,定义了我们对他人的权力和我们对他人的义务,反之亦然。在美国进行的两项研究中,我们调查了一组样本,主要是白人中产阶级儿童,他们在4岁、5岁和6岁时对社会角色的直觉。在实验1中,参与者有两个告密者,一个是主导的(如母亲),一个是从属的(如女儿)。举报人给出了相互矛盾的指示,孩子们决定应该遵循谁的指示,以及哪个举报人拥有更大的社会权力。五岁和六岁的孩子,而不是四岁的孩子,使用社会角色来决定应该遵循哪些指令,所有年龄组的孩子都选择了主导信息提供者,因为他们拥有社会权力。在实验2中,我们通过让相同的被调查者提供关于食物的相互矛盾的信息来探索这种效应的广度。5岁和6岁的参与者相信主导信息者的说法,但4岁的孩子不会优先考虑任何一个信息者的说法。与此同时,当被问及他们会接近谁来了解一种新食物时,孩子们不喜欢任何一个线人。总之,这些发现表明,儿童对等级社会角色的理解在很小的时候就出现了,随着时间的推移而变化,并以微妙的方式影响他们的判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognition and Development is the official journal of the Cognitive Development Society (CDS). Some CDS members are concerned with basic research or theory; others focus on policy issues and practical applications. The range of interests includes cognitive development during all stages of life, and we seek to understand ontogenetic processes in both humans and nonhumans. Finally, their interests encompass typical as well as atypical development, and we attempt to characterize both biological and cultural influences on cognitive change and continuity.
期刊最新文献
Information Sources for Word Meaning in Children’s Picture Books: A Human Simulation Paradigm Study Numeracy Engagement Patterns of U.S. Latine Families Reminiscing Goals and Behavior as Predictors of Child Psychological Functioning Interrelations Between Acuity of the Approximate Number System and Symbolic Skills in Preschool Children Bayesian Tools of the Trade for Developmental Psychologists: A Quick-Start Guide Using JASP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1