Are Large Admissions Test Coaching Effects Widespread? A Longitudinal Analysis of Admissions Test Scores

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Applied Measurement in Education Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/08957347.2023.2172018
Jeffrey A. Dahlke, P. Sackett, N. Kuncel
{"title":"Are Large Admissions Test Coaching Effects Widespread? A Longitudinal Analysis of Admissions Test Scores","authors":"Jeffrey A. Dahlke, P. Sackett, N. Kuncel","doi":"10.1080/08957347.2023.2172018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We examine longitudinal data from 120,384 students who took a version of the PSAT/SAT in the 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grades. We investigate score changes over time and show that socioeconomic status (SES) is related to the degree of score improvement. We note that the 9th and 10th grade PSAT are low-stakes tests, while the operational SAT is a high-stakes test. We posit that investments in coaching would be uncommon for early PSAT administrations, and would be concentrated on efforts to prepare for the operational SAT. We compare score improvements between 9th and 10th grade with improvements between 10th and 12th grade, examining results separately by level of SES. We find similar levels of score improvement in low-stakes and high-stakes settings, with 3.4% of high-SES and 1.1% of low-SES students showing larger-than-expected score improvements, which is inconsistent with claims that high-SES students have routine access to highly effective coaching.","PeriodicalId":51609,"journal":{"name":"Applied Measurement in Education","volume":"36 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Measurement in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2023.2172018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examine longitudinal data from 120,384 students who took a version of the PSAT/SAT in the 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grades. We investigate score changes over time and show that socioeconomic status (SES) is related to the degree of score improvement. We note that the 9th and 10th grade PSAT are low-stakes tests, while the operational SAT is a high-stakes test. We posit that investments in coaching would be uncommon for early PSAT administrations, and would be concentrated on efforts to prepare for the operational SAT. We compare score improvements between 9th and 10th grade with improvements between 10th and 12th grade, examining results separately by level of SES. We find similar levels of score improvement in low-stakes and high-stakes settings, with 3.4% of high-SES and 1.1% of low-SES students showing larger-than-expected score improvements, which is inconsistent with claims that high-SES students have routine access to highly effective coaching.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型招生考试辅导效果广泛吗?招生考试成绩的纵向分析
摘要:我们研究了120384名学生的纵向数据,这些学生在9年级、10年级、11年级和12年级参加了PSAT/SAT考试。我们调查了分数随时间的变化,并表明社会经济地位(SES)与分数提高的程度有关。我们注意到,9年级和10年级的PSAT是低风险测试,而操作SAT是高风险测试。我们认为,对教练的投资在早期PSAT管理中并不常见,而是集中在为SAT操作做准备上。我们比较了9年级和10年级之间的分数提高与10年级和12年级之间的成绩提高,并按SES水平分别检查了结果。我们发现,在低风险和高风险环境中,分数的提高水平相似,3.4%的高社会经济地位学生和1.1%的低社会经济地位的学生表现出比预期更大的分数提高,这与社会经济地位高的学生可以常规获得高效辅导的说法不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Because interaction between the domains of research and application is critical to the evaluation and improvement of new educational measurement practices, Applied Measurement in Education" prime objective is to improve communication between academicians and practitioners. To help bridge the gap between theory and practice, articles in this journal describe original research studies, innovative strategies for solving educational measurement problems, and integrative reviews of current approaches to contemporary measurement issues. Peer Review Policy: All review papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.
期刊最新文献
New Tests of Rater Drift in Trend Scoring Automated Scoring of Short-Answer Questions: A Progress Report Item and Test Characteristic Curves of Rank-2PL Models for Multidimensional Forced-Choice Questionnaires Impact of violating unidimensionality on Rasch calibration for mixed-format tests Can Adaptive Testing Improve Test-Taking Experience? A Case Study on Educational Survey Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1