Comparison of Clonidine with Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Isobaric Ropivacaine in Patients undergoing Vaginal Hysterectomy under Subarachnoid Block

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI:10.4038/SLJA.V29I1.8694
G. Choudhary, K. Chaudhary, R. Swami, Rakesh Karnawat
{"title":"Comparison of Clonidine with Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Isobaric Ropivacaine in Patients undergoing Vaginal Hysterectomy under Subarachnoid Block","authors":"G. Choudhary, K. Chaudhary, R. Swami, Rakesh Karnawat","doi":"10.4038/SLJA.V29I1.8694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Use of adjuncts to local anaesthetics improves the quality of subarachnoid block (SAB). We compared intrathecal clonidine-ropivacaine combination and fentanyl-ropivacaine combination for the quality and duration of sensory and motor block and associated side effects. \nSubjects and methods: 80 patients undergoing elective vaginal hysterectomy under SAB were enrolled for this hospital-based, prospective, randomized, double-blind study and divided into two groups of 40 each. As an adjuvant to 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine Group C received 75 μg intrathecal clonidine (0.5 ml) while Group F was given 25 μg intrathecal fentanyl (0.5 ml). Sensory and motor block characteristics, duration of analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative Campbell sedation score, haemodynamic profile and any adverse event were recorded and analysed. Fischer exact or Chi-square test was used for the comparison of categorical data and unpaired t-test to compare the quantitative data using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. \nResults: Sensory and motor block duration, duration of analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative sedation score was significantly higher in Group C (P < 0.05). Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure were significantly lower in Group C as compared to Group F at various time points with a similar overall incidence of hypotension from the baseline value. \nConclusion: Clonidine-ropivacaine combination in SAB provides a prolonged duration of sensory as well as motor block and enhances postoperative analgesia in comparison to fentanyl-ropivacaine combination with a higher degree of sedation.","PeriodicalId":41531,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SLJA.V29I1.8694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Use of adjuncts to local anaesthetics improves the quality of subarachnoid block (SAB). We compared intrathecal clonidine-ropivacaine combination and fentanyl-ropivacaine combination for the quality and duration of sensory and motor block and associated side effects. Subjects and methods: 80 patients undergoing elective vaginal hysterectomy under SAB were enrolled for this hospital-based, prospective, randomized, double-blind study and divided into two groups of 40 each. As an adjuvant to 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine Group C received 75 μg intrathecal clonidine (0.5 ml) while Group F was given 25 μg intrathecal fentanyl (0.5 ml). Sensory and motor block characteristics, duration of analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative Campbell sedation score, haemodynamic profile and any adverse event were recorded and analysed. Fischer exact or Chi-square test was used for the comparison of categorical data and unpaired t-test to compare the quantitative data using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Sensory and motor block duration, duration of analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative sedation score was significantly higher in Group C (P < 0.05). Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure were significantly lower in Group C as compared to Group F at various time points with a similar overall incidence of hypotension from the baseline value. Conclusion: Clonidine-ropivacaine combination in SAB provides a prolonged duration of sensory as well as motor block and enhances postoperative analgesia in comparison to fentanyl-ropivacaine combination with a higher degree of sedation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克拉定与芬太尼辅助等重罗哌卡因在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下阴道子宫切除术中的比较
背景:在局部麻醉剂中使用辅助药物可以提高蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)的质量。我们比较了鞘内注射罗哌卡因可乐定联合用药和芬太尼罗哌卡因联合用药的感觉和运动阻滞的质量和持续时间以及相关的副作用。受试者和方法:80名在SAB下接受选择性阴道子宫切除术的患者被纳入这项基于医院的前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,并被分为两组,每组40人。作为0.75%等压罗哌卡因的佐剂,C组鞘内给予75μg可乐定(0.5ml),而F组鞘内给药25μg芬太尼(0.5mL)。记录并分析感觉和运动阻滞特征、镇痛持续时间、术中和术后Campbell镇静评分、血液动力学特征和任何不良事件。Fischer精确检验或卡方检验用于比较分类数据,非配对t检验用于比较社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本21的定量数据。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:C组感觉和运动阻滞持续时间、镇痛持续时间、术中和术后镇静评分显著高于F组(P<0.05)。在不同时间点,C组的收缩压、舒张压和平均血压均显著低于F组,低血压的总体发生率与基线值相似。结论:与镇静程度更高的芬太尼-罗哌卡因联合用药相比,可乐定-罗哌嗪联合用药可延长SAB的感觉和运动阻滞时间,并增强术后镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Single-Dose Dexmedetomidine on Cough Response During Tracheal Extubation C-MAC VL as Saviour Following Failed Intubation Attempts in an Infant with Huge Hydrocephalous Internal Carotid Artery Blood Flow Response to Anaesthesia, Pneumoperitoneum and Head-Up Tilt During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Clinical Study Anaphylaxis: Unveiling the silent killer Study on Ward-Based Practice of Vasopressor Administration for Patients with Sepsis, in National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1