Carl Schmitts „Grossraumlehre" im kontext des nationalsozialismus

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Historia Constitucional Pub Date : 2021-09-04 DOI:10.17811/hc.v0i22.727
Peter Techet
{"title":"Carl Schmitts „Grossraumlehre\" im kontext des nationalsozialismus","authors":"Peter Techet","doi":"10.17811/hc.v0i22.727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debates on how Europe can be organized as a unity took place in the National Socialist Germany too. The aim at that time was to unite Europe under German hegemony – as a “large space” around a German empire. Carl Schmitt provided with his “Großraumlehre” one of the best-known theories of a National Socialist Europe. Carl Schmitt developed his theory against the possibility of “world law” as well against state sovereignty. In this paper, the “Großraumlehre” will be analysed, on the one hand, in the context of Schmitt's anti-universalistic and anti-pluralistic legal theory as an alternative to the universalistic and pluralistic legal theory of Hans Kelsen. (I.) On the other hand, Schmitt's theory will be linked to other – clearly racist – National Socialist European plans. (II.) At the end of this paper, I also address the question of whether and why Schmitt's theory – despite the context in which it came out – could remain compatible with today's debates on Europe and global politics. (Ausblick)\nEnviado el (Submission Date): 07/02/2021\nAceptado el (Acceptance Date): 16/04/2021","PeriodicalId":41232,"journal":{"name":"Historia Constitucional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia Constitucional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17811/hc.v0i22.727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The debates on how Europe can be organized as a unity took place in the National Socialist Germany too. The aim at that time was to unite Europe under German hegemony – as a “large space” around a German empire. Carl Schmitt provided with his “Großraumlehre” one of the best-known theories of a National Socialist Europe. Carl Schmitt developed his theory against the possibility of “world law” as well against state sovereignty. In this paper, the “Großraumlehre” will be analysed, on the one hand, in the context of Schmitt's anti-universalistic and anti-pluralistic legal theory as an alternative to the universalistic and pluralistic legal theory of Hans Kelsen. (I.) On the other hand, Schmitt's theory will be linked to other – clearly racist – National Socialist European plans. (II.) At the end of this paper, I also address the question of whether and why Schmitt's theory – despite the context in which it came out – could remain compatible with today's debates on Europe and global politics. (Ausblick) Enviado el (Submission Date): 07/02/2021 Aceptado el (Acceptance Date): 16/04/2021
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家社会主义语境下的施密特“大空间理论”
关于如何将欧洲组织成一个统一体的辩论也发生在国家社会主义德国。当时的目标是将欧洲统一在德国霸权之下——作为一个围绕德意志帝国的“大空间”。卡尔·施密特提出了他的“Großraumlehre”,这是欧洲国家社会主义最著名的理论之一。卡尔·施密特发展了他的理论,反对“世界法”的可能性,也反对国家主权。本文将“Großraumlehre”一方面放在施密特的反普世和反多元法律理论的背景下进行分析,以替代汉斯·凯尔森的普世和多元法律理论。(I.)另一方面,施密特的理论将与其他明显带有种族主义色彩的欧洲国家社会主义计划联系在一起。(II.)在本文的最后,我还谈到了施密特的理论是否以及为什么能够与今天关于欧洲和全球政治的辩论保持一致的问题,尽管它是在什么背景下提出的。(Ausblick)Enviado el(提交日期):07/02/2021验收日期:16/04/2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
República e Constituição: debates parlamentares sobre revisão constitucional em Portugal (1915-1921) O Enigma da Súplica Constitucional Portuguesa de 1808 The Development of Constitutionalism in Albania (1912-1938) Lo legal y lo legítimo: Notas en torno a la relación entre Otto Kirchheimer y Carl Schmitt La monarquía constitucional: la fórmula política de la España liberal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1