Addressing the Needs of Lawyers in Legal English: A Comparative Study in Four European Union Countries

Q2 Arts and Humanities Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI:10.14746/cl.2018.33.3
Halina Sierocka, B. Chovancová, Ljubica Kordić
{"title":"Addressing the Needs of Lawyers in Legal English: A Comparative Study in Four European Union Countries","authors":"Halina Sierocka, B. Chovancová, Ljubica Kordić","doi":"10.14746/cl.2018.33.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper reports on a survey into the linguistic needs of law professionals in four European countries, with the aim of identifying their views on the importance and their use of foreign language skills as well as their preferences for ELP course content. The data, obtained from a questionnaire survey of 536 legal professionals from Poland, the Czech Republic, Croatia and Germany, show that while the respondents agree on many of the major points, there are also some differences conditioned by the respondents’ age and the specific tasks they perform in the legal profession. The article argues that these variables have to be taken into consideration in the LSP context because they determine some of the specific needs that need to be addressed in Legal English instruction. It is suggested that the findings about the lawyers’ self-perceived importance and preferred styles of learning are highly relevant for LSP practitioners, particularly when designing Legal English programmes and testing materials.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legilinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2018.33.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The paper reports on a survey into the linguistic needs of law professionals in four European countries, with the aim of identifying their views on the importance and their use of foreign language skills as well as their preferences for ELP course content. The data, obtained from a questionnaire survey of 536 legal professionals from Poland, the Czech Republic, Croatia and Germany, show that while the respondents agree on many of the major points, there are also some differences conditioned by the respondents’ age and the specific tasks they perform in the legal profession. The article argues that these variables have to be taken into consideration in the LSP context because they determine some of the specific needs that need to be addressed in Legal English instruction. It is suggested that the findings about the lawyers’ self-perceived importance and preferred styles of learning are highly relevant for LSP practitioners, particularly when designing Legal English programmes and testing materials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用法律英语满足律师的需求——欧盟四个国家的比较研究
摘要本文报告了对四个欧洲国家法律专业人员语言需求的调查,目的是确定他们对外语技能的重要性和使用的看法,以及他们对ELP课程内容的偏好。这些数据来自对来自波兰、捷克共和国、克罗地亚和德国的536名法律专业人员的问卷调查,显示尽管受访者在许多要点上意见一致,但也存在一些差异,这取决于受访者的年龄和他们在法律职业中执行的具体任务。文章认为,在LSP环境中必须考虑这些变量,因为它们决定了法律英语教学中需要解决的一些具体需求。研究表明,关于律师自我感知的重要性和偏好的学习风格的研究结果与LSP从业者高度相关,尤其是在设计法律英语课程和测试材料时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Legilinguistics
Comparative Legilinguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Simultaneous interpretation in interpreter-mediated remote legal proceedings: some observations from a forum theatre study De la protection de l’environnement dans les Constitutions Algeriennes On the challenges of legal translation Problems in English-Chinese and Chinese-English legal translation: with a case study of mistranslations Preface to the Special Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1