Saying His Name: How Faith-Based Higher Education Leaders Addressed the George Floyd Murder

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Religion & Education Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1080/15507394.2022.2156262
Z. W. Taylor, Marcelle Pereira, Liz Rainey, Suchitra Gururaj, Ben Gibbs, James L. Wiser, Corey Benson, J. Childs, P. Somers
{"title":"Saying His Name: How Faith-Based Higher Education Leaders Addressed the George Floyd Murder","authors":"Z. W. Taylor, Marcelle Pereira, Liz Rainey, Suchitra Gururaj, Ben Gibbs, James L. Wiser, Corey Benson, J. Childs, P. Somers","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2022.2156262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As George Floyd’s murder in May 2020 catalyzed a global protest against systemic racism and police brutality, many executive leaders of institutions of higher education issued public statements on the tragedy. What the research has not made clear is how leaders of faith-based institutions address instances of systemic racism and police brutality, specifically analyzing which audiences are addressed, what institutional values are extolled, and how the institution plans to contribute to social justice initiatives in their community or nation. Conceptualizing the data using Noelle-Neumann’s spiral of silence and Lieblich et al.’s narrative theory, this study analyzed 254 statements made by leaders of faith-based institutions of higher education to investigate their commentary on the George Floyd murder and their institutions’ possible orientation toward social justice. Results suggest many faith-based institutions “say his name” and explicitly mention George Floyd, but many shied away from describing his death as a “murder,” while institutions were more likely to extoll religious beliefs than support Black Lives Matter or mention oppression experienced by Black and African American people. Implications for research, policy, and practice are addressed.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":"50 1","pages":"39 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2022.2156262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract As George Floyd’s murder in May 2020 catalyzed a global protest against systemic racism and police brutality, many executive leaders of institutions of higher education issued public statements on the tragedy. What the research has not made clear is how leaders of faith-based institutions address instances of systemic racism and police brutality, specifically analyzing which audiences are addressed, what institutional values are extolled, and how the institution plans to contribute to social justice initiatives in their community or nation. Conceptualizing the data using Noelle-Neumann’s spiral of silence and Lieblich et al.’s narrative theory, this study analyzed 254 statements made by leaders of faith-based institutions of higher education to investigate their commentary on the George Floyd murder and their institutions’ possible orientation toward social justice. Results suggest many faith-based institutions “say his name” and explicitly mention George Floyd, but many shied away from describing his death as a “murder,” while institutions were more likely to extoll religious beliefs than support Black Lives Matter or mention oppression experienced by Black and African American people. Implications for research, policy, and practice are addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
说出他的名字:基于信仰的高等教育领袖如何处理乔治·弗洛伊德谋杀案
摘要随着乔治·弗洛伊德于2020年5月被谋杀,引发了全球对系统性种族主义和警察暴行的抗议,许多高等教育机构的行政领导人就这场悲剧发表了公开声明。该研究尚未明确的是,信仰机构的领导人如何应对系统性种族主义和警察暴行,具体分析了哪些受众受到了关注,哪些机构价值观受到了赞扬,以及该机构计划如何为其社区或国家的社会正义倡议做出贡献。本研究利用诺埃尔·诺依曼的沉默螺旋和利布利希等人的叙事理论对数据进行了概念化,分析了信仰高等教育机构领导人发表的254份声明,以调查他们对乔治·弗洛伊德谋杀案的评论以及他们的机构对社会正义的可能取向。结果表明,许多基于信仰的机构“说出了他的名字”,并明确提到了乔治·弗洛伊德,但许多机构回避将他的死描述为“谋杀”,而机构更有可能赞美宗教信仰,而不是支持黑人的命也是命,或提及黑人和非裔美国人所经历的压迫。讨论了对研究、政策和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
50 Years of Religion & Education: The Origins of the Journal and the Interdisciplinary Study of Religion and Education Religion, Education, and the Future of Democratic Pluralism Review: Spirituality That Makes a Difference, by Charles R. Kniker, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022; ISBN: 978-1-6667-1789-1 “One More Thing”: Clarifying the Evidence Around Christian Privilege in Higher Education Catholic and Public Schools Compared: Examining Achievement Growth in an Urban Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1