Introducción Número Especial: OUTLIERS OF PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL: DYNAMICS, LEVELS, AND RATES

Ryan E. Carlin, Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo
{"title":"Introducción Número Especial: OUTLIERS OF PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL: DYNAMICS, LEVELS, AND RATES","authors":"Ryan E. Carlin, Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo","doi":"10.14201/rlop.22352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presidential approval tends to exhibit the dynamics of honeymoon, decline, and a rebound as elections near. But several presidential administrations and, indeed, some countries themselves, do not conform to this pattern. This introduction to the special issue identifies and classifies outliers to the typical dynamics of approval using a 12-category taxonomy and data on 140 presidential administrations in 18 Latin American countries from the Executive Approval Project 1.0. Contributors to this special issue use this taxonomy to select outlier cases to explain in their respective articles. This combination of cross-national and case-study approaches suggest a more general theory of presidential approval can be constructed by systematically testing new hypotheses generated in this special issue concerning the role of governing style, political communication, security, policy choice, and institutional context. 1 The authors are grateful to Mariano Torcal and the editorial board of RLOP for their encouragement and support of this special issue. We thank Peter Enns, Gregg Johnson, Aníbal Pérez-Liñán, Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, James Stimson, Christopher Wlezien, Elizabeth Zechmeister, and the other core members of the Executive Approval Project (Jonathan Hartlyn, Timothy Hellwig, Gregory Love, and Matthew Singer) for their feedback on previous drafts of this manuscript and on the structure of the special issue. Additionally, we thank all Executive Approval Project Country Team Leaders and all others who contributed the data that make these analyses possible. Finally, we greatly appreciate the work of two anonymous reviewers who provided excellent comments on all articles in this special issue. 2 Professor, Department of Political Science and Director of the Center for Human Rights and Democracy, Georgia State University; Core Member, Executive Approval Project; rcarlin@gsu.edu. 3 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Core Member, Executive Approval Project; cmg@unc.edu. 8 REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE OPINIÓN PÚBLICA / NÚMERO 9","PeriodicalId":52748,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinion Publica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinion Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/rlop.22352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Presidential approval tends to exhibit the dynamics of honeymoon, decline, and a rebound as elections near. But several presidential administrations and, indeed, some countries themselves, do not conform to this pattern. This introduction to the special issue identifies and classifies outliers to the typical dynamics of approval using a 12-category taxonomy and data on 140 presidential administrations in 18 Latin American countries from the Executive Approval Project 1.0. Contributors to this special issue use this taxonomy to select outlier cases to explain in their respective articles. This combination of cross-national and case-study approaches suggest a more general theory of presidential approval can be constructed by systematically testing new hypotheses generated in this special issue concerning the role of governing style, political communication, security, policy choice, and institutional context. 1 The authors are grateful to Mariano Torcal and the editorial board of RLOP for their encouragement and support of this special issue. We thank Peter Enns, Gregg Johnson, Aníbal Pérez-Liñán, Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, James Stimson, Christopher Wlezien, Elizabeth Zechmeister, and the other core members of the Executive Approval Project (Jonathan Hartlyn, Timothy Hellwig, Gregory Love, and Matthew Singer) for their feedback on previous drafts of this manuscript and on the structure of the special issue. Additionally, we thank all Executive Approval Project Country Team Leaders and all others who contributed the data that make these analyses possible. Finally, we greatly appreciate the work of two anonymous reviewers who provided excellent comments on all articles in this special issue. 2 Professor, Department of Political Science and Director of the Center for Human Rights and Democracy, Georgia State University; Core Member, Executive Approval Project; rcarlin@gsu.edu. 3 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Core Member, Executive Approval Project; cmg@unc.edu. 8 REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE OPINIÓN PÚBLICA / NÚMERO 9
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introducción Número特别:总统支持率的异常值:动态、水平和比率
随着选举的临近,总统支持率往往呈现出蜜月期、下降和反弹的动态变化。但几届总统政府,甚至一些国家本身,都不符合这种模式。本特刊的介绍使用12类分类法和来自行政审批项目1.0的18个拉丁美洲国家140个总统行政部门的数据来确定和分类典型审批动态的异常值。本期特刊的撰稿人使用这种分类法来选择异常情况,并在各自的文章中进行解释。这种跨国和案例研究方法的结合表明,通过系统地测试本期特刊中关于执政风格、政治沟通、安全、政策选择和制度背景的作用的新假设,可以构建一个更普遍的总统批准理论。1 .作者感谢Mariano Torcal和RLOP编辑委员会对本期特刊的鼓励和支持。我们感谢Peter Enns, Gregg Johnson, Aníbal Pérez-Liñán, Sarah shairrosenfield, James Stimson, Christopher Wlezien, Elizabeth Zechmeister以及行政审批项目的其他核心成员(Jonathan Hartlyn, Timothy Hellwig, Gregory Love和Matthew Singer)对本手稿之前的草稿和特刊结构的反馈。此外,我们感谢所有行政审批项目国家团队负责人和所有其他提供数据使这些分析成为可能的人。最后,我们非常感谢两位匿名审稿人的工作,他们对本期特刊的所有文章都提供了出色的评论。乔治亚州立大学政治学系教授、人权与民主研究中心主任;行政审批项目核心成员;rcarlin@gsu.edu。北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政治学系副教授;行政审批项目核心成员;cmg@unc.edu。8 . resta latinoamericana de opiniÓn pÚblica / nÚmero
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Peru: Deep Political Dissatisfaction Weakens Support for Democracy Andy Baker, Barry Ames, and Lúcio Rennó. Persuasive Peers: Social Communication and Voting in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. 369 pages. ISBN 9780691205786. Clientelist Mobilization and Political Participation Outside of the Electoral Arena The Power of Political Discussion: Uncovering the Influence of Networks on Vote Choice and its Mechanisms Does China’s Rise influence anti-Americanism? Evidence from Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1