Constructing Colonial Peoples: W. E. B. Du Bois, the United Nations, and the Politics of Space and Scale

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Modern Intellectual History Pub Date : 2022-09-23 DOI:10.1017/S1479244322000464
A. Dahl
{"title":"Constructing Colonial Peoples: W. E. B. Du Bois, the United Nations, and the Politics of Space and Scale","authors":"A. Dahl","doi":"10.1017/S1479244322000464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines W. E. B. Du Bois's transnational political thought during his work with the UN and the NAACP in the 1940s. Focusing on unpublished speeches, essays, and correspondence, it explores how he exploited the conceptual elasticity of terms like “colonial status” and “colonial peoples” in order to build a transnational majority on a global scale. The conceptual capaciousness of the term “colony” and its cognates allowed him to connect disparate forms of domination and dependence across boundaries of race, nation, and empire, thus binding colonial and semicolonial peoples together in a common program of international action. The fruition of these efforts, I argue, was Du Bois's 1948 petition to the UN, An Appeal to the World. Through the appropriation of international legal discourse, he sought to politicize the jurisdictional bifurcation of domestic and international politics embedded in the UN Charter and expand the spatial scale of democracy by placing civil rights struggles in imperial context.","PeriodicalId":44584,"journal":{"name":"Modern Intellectual History","volume":"20 1","pages":"858 - 882"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Intellectual History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244322000464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines W. E. B. Du Bois's transnational political thought during his work with the UN and the NAACP in the 1940s. Focusing on unpublished speeches, essays, and correspondence, it explores how he exploited the conceptual elasticity of terms like “colonial status” and “colonial peoples” in order to build a transnational majority on a global scale. The conceptual capaciousness of the term “colony” and its cognates allowed him to connect disparate forms of domination and dependence across boundaries of race, nation, and empire, thus binding colonial and semicolonial peoples together in a common program of international action. The fruition of these efforts, I argue, was Du Bois's 1948 petition to the UN, An Appeal to the World. Through the appropriation of international legal discourse, he sought to politicize the jurisdictional bifurcation of domestic and international politics embedded in the UN Charter and expand the spatial scale of democracy by placing civil rights struggles in imperial context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建构殖民地人民:杜波依斯、联合国、空间与规模的政治
本文考察了W. E. B.杜波依斯在20世纪40年代为联合国和全国有色人种协进会工作期间的跨国政治思想。这本书聚焦于未发表的演讲、散文和信件,探讨了他如何利用“殖民地位”和“殖民地人民”等术语的概念弹性,以在全球范围内建立跨国多数。“殖民地”一词及其同源词的概念容量使他能够跨越种族、国家和帝国的界限,将不同形式的统治和依赖联系起来,从而将殖民地和半殖民地人民联系在一起,共同制定国际行动计划。我认为,这些努力的成果就是杜波依斯1948年向联合国提交的请愿书《致世界的呼吁》。通过对国际法律话语的挪用,他试图将《联合国宪章》中嵌入的国内和国际政治的管辖权分歧政治化,并通过将民权斗争置于帝国背景下扩大民主的空间规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Structuralist or Lesbian? Claude Lévi-Strauss and Monique Wittig on Rousseau's “Science” From the Hebrew Commonwealth to Party Politics: Rousseau's Legacy and the Nation-State in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought From the Body of the King to the Body of the Nation: Sovereignty, Sodomy, and the English Revolution of 1688 Legal Counterrevolution: Property and Judicial Power in the Weimar Republic Isaac Breuer's Antiliberal Neo-Kantianism and the Politicization of Jewish Ultra-Orthodoxy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1