How will natural gas market reforms affect carbon marginal abatement costs? Evidence from China

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economic Systems Research Pub Date : 2021-01-06 DOI:10.1080/09535314.2020.1868410
Hong-Dian Jiang, Meimei Xue, Kangyin Dong, Qiao-Mei Liang
{"title":"How will natural gas market reforms affect carbon marginal abatement costs? Evidence from China","authors":"Hong-Dian Jiang, Meimei Xue, Kangyin Dong, Qiao-Mei Liang","doi":"10.1080/09535314.2020.1868410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Having recognised the significant role of natural gas in reducing carbon abatement costs, China is rapidly promoting its growth. However, obvious distortions exist in China’s natural gas market, and it is unclear how these may affect abatement policies going forward. Therefore, to assess the effects of energy market distortions on the carbon marginal abatement costs (MACs) in China, this study proposes a computable general equilibrium model for China’s natural gas sector, which considers the monopoly market structure, price regulation, and import restrictions. Results show that deregulation of gas prices will lead to an effective decrease in China’s MACs. China’s MACs are insensitive to liberalisation of the market monopoly or gas import restrictions. When all three distortions are fully deregulated, China’s MACs show an obvious upward trend. Finally, this study uses China's carbon trading policies as an example to propose policy implications under different scenarios of natural gas market reform.","PeriodicalId":47760,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"129 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09535314.2020.1868410","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2020.1868410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Having recognised the significant role of natural gas in reducing carbon abatement costs, China is rapidly promoting its growth. However, obvious distortions exist in China’s natural gas market, and it is unclear how these may affect abatement policies going forward. Therefore, to assess the effects of energy market distortions on the carbon marginal abatement costs (MACs) in China, this study proposes a computable general equilibrium model for China’s natural gas sector, which considers the monopoly market structure, price regulation, and import restrictions. Results show that deregulation of gas prices will lead to an effective decrease in China’s MACs. China’s MACs are insensitive to liberalisation of the market monopoly or gas import restrictions. When all three distortions are fully deregulated, China’s MACs show an obvious upward trend. Finally, this study uses China's carbon trading policies as an example to propose policy implications under different scenarios of natural gas market reform.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天然气市场改革将如何影响碳边际减排成本?来自中国的证据
在认识到天然气在降低碳减排成本方面的重要作用后,中国正在迅速推动其增长。然而,中国天然气市场存在明显的扭曲,目前尚不清楚这将如何影响未来的减排政策。因此,为了评估能源市场扭曲对中国碳边际减排成本(MACs)的影响,本研究提出了考虑垄断市场结构、价格管制和进口限制的中国天然气部门可计算一般均衡模型。结果表明,天然气价格放松管制将导致中国MACs的有效下降。中国的石油公司对市场垄断自由化或天然气进口限制不敏感。当这三种扭曲都被完全解除管制时,中国的mac表现出明显的上升趋势。最后,本文以中国碳交易政策为例,提出了天然气市场改革不同情景下的政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Economic Systems Research is a double blind peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the furtherance of theoretical and factual knowledge about economic systems, structures and processes, and their change through time and space, at the subnational, national and international level. The journal contains sensible, matter-of-fact tools and data for modelling, policy analysis, planning and decision making in large economic environments. It promotes understanding in economic thinking and between theoretical schools of East and West, North and South.
期刊最新文献
Coupling an integrated assessment model with an input–output database Storm in the Cloud: A Study on the Macroeconomic Impact of the UK’s Digital Service Tax Structural change and socio-economic disparities in a net zero transition Risk-based dynamic inoperability input-output and non-linear optimisation models to analyse resilience in the construction industry Forced labour in the fashion industry: a hypothetical EU-driven reorganisation of textile value chains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1