Verbal cues to deceit when lying through omitting information

IF 2.2 2区社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12180

Sharon Leal, Aldert Vrij, Haneen Deeb, Charlotte Hudson, Pasquale Capuozzo, Ronald P. Fisher

{"title":"Verbal cues to deceit when lying through omitting information","authors":"Sharon Leal, Aldert Vrij, Haneen Deeb, Charlotte Hudson, Pasquale Capuozzo, Ronald P. Fisher","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Lying through omitting information has been neglected in verbal lie detection research. The task is challenging: Can we decipher from the truthful information a lie teller provides that s/he is hiding something? We expected this to be the case because of lie tellers’ inclination to keep their stories simple. We predicted lie tellers to provide fewer details and fewer complications than truth tellers, the latter particularly after exposure to a Model Statement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 44 truth tellers and 41 lie tellers were interviewed about a conversation (debriefing interview) they had taken part in earlier. Lie tellers were asked not to discuss one aspect of that debriefing interview.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results showed that truth tellers reported more complications than lie tellers after exposure to a Model Statement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Ideas about future research in lying through omissions are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"25 2","pages":"278-294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lcrp.12180","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

Lying through omitting information has been neglected in verbal lie detection research. The task is challenging: Can we decipher from the truthful information a lie teller provides that s/he is hiding something? We expected this to be the case because of lie tellers’ inclination to keep their stories simple. We predicted lie tellers to provide fewer details and fewer complications than truth tellers, the latter particularly after exposure to a Model Statement.

Method

A total of 44 truth tellers and 41 lie tellers were interviewed about a conversation (debriefing interview) they had taken part in earlier. Lie tellers were asked not to discuss one aspect of that debriefing interview.

Results

Results showed that truth tellers reported more complications than lie tellers after exposure to a Model Statement.

Conclusion

Ideas about future research in lying through omissions are discussed.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

通过隐瞒信息来暗示说谎

背景在言语测谎研究中，通过省略信息撒谎一直被忽视。这项任务很有挑战性：我们能从说谎者提供的真实信息中解读出他/她在隐瞒什么吗？我们预计会出现这种情况，因为说谎的人倾向于保持他们的故事简单。我们预测说谎言的人比说真话的人提供更少的细节和更少的复杂性，后者尤其是在暴露于模型陈述之后。方法共有44名真相讲述者和41名谎言讲述者就他们之前参加的一次对话（汇报采访）接受了采访。说谎的人被要求不要讨论汇报采访的某个方面。后果结果显示，在暴露于模型陈述后，真相讲述者比谎言讲述者报告了更多的并发症。结论对今后补漏撒谎研究的思路进行了探讨

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Legal and Criminological Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

4.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.