Switching between Originators and Biosimilars in Dermatology: A Systematic Review of Real-World Clinical Studies

M. M. Nicoletti, Erminia Crisci, C. Pentella, Andrea Cantone, Donatella Ruggiero, Antonietta Anatriello, C. Scavone
{"title":"Switching between Originators and Biosimilars in Dermatology: A Systematic Review of Real-World Clinical Studies","authors":"M. M. Nicoletti, Erminia Crisci, C. Pentella, Andrea Cantone, Donatella Ruggiero, Antonietta Anatriello, C. Scavone","doi":"10.3390/biologics3020006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Although biosimilars have been increasingly used over recent years, some concerns about a potential loss of efficacy and altered safety profile when switching from an originator to a biosimilar still exist. Interchangeability can be a challenge for dermatologists too. An extensive systematic review of published switching studies among originators and biosimilars was carried out in order to provide evidence regarding the effects derived from the switch in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes in real-life contexts. Results. Thirty-seven articles were included in this systematic review (14 studies related to adalimumab, 10 to etanercept, 12 to infliximab, and 1 each to adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab). Studies were mainly carried out among European countries. Most of them were observational studies or register-based studies. The majority of studies enrolled patients diagnosed with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis who underwent a single switch from the originator to the biosimilar. Overall, the studies’ results demonstrated that switching between adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab originators and biosimilars is safe and effective in a real-life setting of patients with dermatological conditions. Only a few studies highlighted an increase in the risk of loss of efficacy as well as an increased rate of AEs, both of which were identified as the main causes of biosimilar discontinuation, probably associated with the well-known phenomenon of the nocebo effect. Conclusion. Switching from a biologic originator to its biosimilar is safe and effective. Only a few studies have evaluated the switch among biosimilars; thus, no firm conclusion can be drawn for this type of switch in terms of the efficacy and safety outcomes. Based on our results, we believe that biosimilars can be considered interchangeable with their reference products and that no additional switch studies are necessary to support switching among originators and biosimilars in clinical practice. However, the continuous monitoring of all biologics (both originators and biosimilars) in routine clinical practice is strongly needed given their peculiar safety profile.","PeriodicalId":93526,"journal":{"name":"Biologics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biologics3020006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. Although biosimilars have been increasingly used over recent years, some concerns about a potential loss of efficacy and altered safety profile when switching from an originator to a biosimilar still exist. Interchangeability can be a challenge for dermatologists too. An extensive systematic review of published switching studies among originators and biosimilars was carried out in order to provide evidence regarding the effects derived from the switch in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes in real-life contexts. Results. Thirty-seven articles were included in this systematic review (14 studies related to adalimumab, 10 to etanercept, 12 to infliximab, and 1 each to adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab). Studies were mainly carried out among European countries. Most of them were observational studies or register-based studies. The majority of studies enrolled patients diagnosed with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis who underwent a single switch from the originator to the biosimilar. Overall, the studies’ results demonstrated that switching between adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab originators and biosimilars is safe and effective in a real-life setting of patients with dermatological conditions. Only a few studies highlighted an increase in the risk of loss of efficacy as well as an increased rate of AEs, both of which were identified as the main causes of biosimilar discontinuation, probably associated with the well-known phenomenon of the nocebo effect. Conclusion. Switching from a biologic originator to its biosimilar is safe and effective. Only a few studies have evaluated the switch among biosimilars; thus, no firm conclusion can be drawn for this type of switch in terms of the efficacy and safety outcomes. Based on our results, we believe that biosimilars can be considered interchangeable with their reference products and that no additional switch studies are necessary to support switching among originators and biosimilars in clinical practice. However, the continuous monitoring of all biologics (both originators and biosimilars) in routine clinical practice is strongly needed given their peculiar safety profile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮肤病学中起源者和生物仿制药之间的转换:真实世界临床研究的系统综述
背景尽管近年来生物仿制药的使用越来越多,但人们仍然担心,当从原始生物转为生物仿制药时,可能会失去疗效并改变安全性。互换性对皮肤科医生来说也是一个挑战。对已发表的原创者和生物仿制药之间的转换研究进行了广泛的系统审查,以提供证据,证明在现实生活中转换对疗效和安全性的影响。后果本系统综述共收录了37篇文章(14项研究与阿达木单抗有关,10项研究与依那西普有关,12项研究与英夫利昔单抗有关,阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利单抗各1项)。研究主要在欧洲国家之间进行。其中大多数是观察性研究或基于登记的研究。大多数研究招募了被诊断为银屑病或银屑病关节炎的患者,这些患者经历了从始发者到生物仿制药的单一转换。总的来说,研究结果表明,在皮肤病患者的现实生活中,在阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗起始药和生物仿制药之间切换是安全有效的。只有少数研究强调了疗效丧失风险的增加以及不良事件发生率的增加,这两种情况都被确定为生物仿制药停用的主要原因,可能与众所周知的nocebo效应现象有关。结论从生物始祖转变为其生物仿制品是安全有效的。只有少数研究评估了生物仿制药之间的转变;因此,就疗效和安全性结果而言,这种类型的开关还不能得出确切的结论。根据我们的研究结果,我们认为生物仿制药可以被视为与其参考产品可互换,并且不需要额外的转换研究来支持临床实践中在起始药和生物仿制药之间的转换。然而,鉴于所有生物制剂的特殊安全性,在常规临床实践中,强烈需要对其进行持续监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Anti-DFS70 in the Diagnosis of Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases Is Metagenomics the Future Routine Diagnosis Tool for Brain Abscesses? About a Case Neoantigens: The Novel Precision Cancer Immunotherapy Dose-Dependency of the Glycemic Response to Polyphenol-Rich Sugarcane Extract (PRSE) Robust Porcine GFR Measurement with Radiotracers and Only Late Blood Samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1