Learning from… (or “the need for queer pedagogies of space”)

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 N/A ARCHITECTURE Interiors-Design Architecture Culture Pub Date : 2018-05-04 DOI:10.1080/20419112.2019.1565175
Olivier Vallerand
{"title":"Learning from… (or “the need for queer pedagogies of space”)","authors":"Olivier Vallerand","doi":"10.1080/20419112.2019.1565175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its emergence in architectural discussions in the early 1990s, more than 25 years later, the idea of queerness has yet to fully transform the way we practice, teach or even experience spatial design. While obviously focused on how gender and sexuality play a role in the building of personal and collective identifications, queer theory becomes much more interesting when used to think more broadly about how different elements intersect in our experience and use of space. Unfortunately, despite most of the thinking about the relation between queerness and architecture taking place in the academic world, its impact on architectural pedagogy has been quite limited and very few designers have learned from queer theory’s insights. This essay develops different innovative teaching methods through interviews with educators across the world and focuses on how interiors education can become a vessel for queer and feminist ideas to impact architecture and design education at large. These strategies include embracing failure and disruption, supporting students, and becoming engaged activist educators. They focus on bridging a gap between different groups, on helping designers to acknowledge the limits of their designs and to maximize the possibilities offered by their design decisions. Queering design means building relations, offering layered opportunities, multiplying possible experiences. Queering design pedagogy in turn means multiplying points of views, opening the discipline to not only other disciplines, but to the everyday, and thinking about how our experiences as human beings, impact and transform our designs.","PeriodicalId":41420,"journal":{"name":"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20419112.2019.1565175","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2019.1565175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite its emergence in architectural discussions in the early 1990s, more than 25 years later, the idea of queerness has yet to fully transform the way we practice, teach or even experience spatial design. While obviously focused on how gender and sexuality play a role in the building of personal and collective identifications, queer theory becomes much more interesting when used to think more broadly about how different elements intersect in our experience and use of space. Unfortunately, despite most of the thinking about the relation between queerness and architecture taking place in the academic world, its impact on architectural pedagogy has been quite limited and very few designers have learned from queer theory’s insights. This essay develops different innovative teaching methods through interviews with educators across the world and focuses on how interiors education can become a vessel for queer and feminist ideas to impact architecture and design education at large. These strategies include embracing failure and disruption, supporting students, and becoming engaged activist educators. They focus on bridging a gap between different groups, on helping designers to acknowledge the limits of their designs and to maximize the possibilities offered by their design decisions. Queering design means building relations, offering layered opportunities, multiplying possible experiences. Queering design pedagogy in turn means multiplying points of views, opening the discipline to not only other disciplines, but to the everyday, and thinking about how our experiences as human beings, impact and transform our designs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从…学习(或“对奇怪的空间教学法的需求”)
尽管在20世纪90年代初,即25多年后的建筑讨论中出现了酷炫的概念,但它尚未完全改变我们实践、教学甚至体验空间设计的方式。虽然很明显,酷儿理论关注的是性别和性行为如何在建立个人和集体认同中发挥作用,但当它被用来更广泛地思考不同元素如何在我们的体验和空间使用中交叉时,它变得更加有趣。不幸的是,尽管学术界对酷儿与建筑之间的关系进行了大部分思考,但它对建筑教育学的影响非常有限,很少有设计师从酷儿理论的见解中学习。本文通过对世界各地教育工作者的采访,开发了不同的创新教学方法,并重点关注室内教育如何成为酷儿和女权主义思想影响建筑和设计教育的容器。这些策略包括拥抱失败和混乱,支持学生,以及成为积极的教育工作者。他们专注于弥合不同群体之间的差距,帮助设计师认识到他们设计的局限性,并最大限度地利用他们的设计决策提供的可能性。追求设计意味着建立关系,提供分层机会,增加可能的体验。反过来,探索设计教育学意味着增加观点,不仅向其他学科开放,而且向日常开放,并思考我们作为人类的经历如何影响和改变我们的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The edge of experiences. Towards a material ecology of augmented interiors Inside/outside: the interior façade as the stage of the architectural and urban in-between Aspects of openness in Hong Kong coffee shops The meanings, changes, and challenges of the Grandmother’s house in Mosuo vernacular dwellings in Northwest Yunnan The not-so-open open plan – A feminist critique of the typical Danish interior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1