Beyond ‘donor-recipient relations’? A historical-institutionalist perspective on recent efforts to modernise EU partnerships with third countries

IF 1.1 Q2 AREA STUDIES Journal of Contemporary European Research Pub Date : 2020-12-12 DOI:10.30950/jcer.v16i3.1076
N. Keijzer
{"title":"Beyond ‘donor-recipient relations’? A historical-institutionalist perspective on recent efforts to modernise EU partnerships with third countries","authors":"N. Keijzer","doi":"10.30950/jcer.v16i3.1076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a historical-institutionalist perspective on the EU’s current efforts to modernise its development policy and reform its various relationships with third countries. Applying concepts that endogenise institutional change, the analysis looks into the origin and basis of the policy and describes the various types of development partnership that the EU pursues with third countries. The paper subsequently analyses the 2007 Joint Africa-EU Strategy and the negotiations on EU-ACP post-2020, with a specific focus on how the development of these partnerships over time affects current EU efforts to seek to move beyond donor-recipient relations. It observes a gap between the reform-oriented discourse and the relative continuity in relationships over time, which serves to secure both the support of reform-oriented actors and those seeking to preserve the status quo. Repetition of this strategy over time combined with the need to launch new initiatives as well as changing circumstances affect this broad-based consensus and the legitimacy of the partnerships concerned.","PeriodicalId":44985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i3.1076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper presents a historical-institutionalist perspective on the EU’s current efforts to modernise its development policy and reform its various relationships with third countries. Applying concepts that endogenise institutional change, the analysis looks into the origin and basis of the policy and describes the various types of development partnership that the EU pursues with third countries. The paper subsequently analyses the 2007 Joint Africa-EU Strategy and the negotiations on EU-ACP post-2020, with a specific focus on how the development of these partnerships over time affects current EU efforts to seek to move beyond donor-recipient relations. It observes a gap between the reform-oriented discourse and the relative continuity in relationships over time, which serves to secure both the support of reform-oriented actors and those seeking to preserve the status quo. Repetition of this strategy over time combined with the need to launch new initiatives as well as changing circumstances affect this broad-based consensus and the legitimacy of the partnerships concerned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越“捐赠-接受者关系”?从历史制度主义角度看待欧盟与第三国伙伴关系现代化的近期努力
本文从历史制度主义的角度审视了欧盟目前为实现发展政策现代化和改革与第三国的各种关系所做的努力。运用内生制度变革的概念,分析了该政策的起源和基础,并描述了欧盟与第三国建立的各种类型的发展伙伴关系。该文件随后分析了2007年《非洲-欧盟联合战略》和2020年后欧盟-东盟合作伙伴关系的谈判,重点关注这些伙伴关系的发展如何影响欧盟目前寻求超越捐助国-受援国关系的努力。它观察到,随着时间的推移,以改革为导向的话语与关系的相对连续性之间存在差距,这有助于确保以改革为主导的行动者和那些寻求维持现状的行动者的支持。随着时间的推移,这一战略的重复,加上发起新倡议的必要性以及不断变化的环境,影响了这一基础广泛的共识和有关伙伴关系的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decolonising EU Trade Relations with the Global Souths? Disrupting and Re-imagining European Studies: towards a More Diverse and Inclusive Discipline Moving from EU-centrisms: Lessons from the Polycrisis for EU studies and Global South Regionalism Rethinking African-European Scientific Cooperation: The Case of the Platform for African-European Studies Unlearning and Relearning Europe: Theoretical and Practical Approaches to Decolonising European Studies Curricula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1