What’s Computational Thinking?: Secondary Science Teachers’ Conceptualizations of Computational Thinking (CT) and Perceived Barriers to CT Integration

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Science Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1080/1046560X.2022.2110068
Vance Kite, Soonhye Park
{"title":"What’s Computational Thinking?: Secondary Science Teachers’ Conceptualizations of Computational Thinking (CT) and Perceived Barriers to CT Integration","authors":"Vance Kite, Soonhye Park","doi":"10.1080/1046560X.2022.2110068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recognizing that the power of computation has changed the practice of science, science education standards in a number of countries have included a call for the inclusion of computational thinking (CT) in K-12 science education. As CT is a relatively new construct, preparing inservice science teachers to implement CT-infused learning experiences depends on the creation of robust CT professional development (CT-PD) initiatives. Given that teachers’ understandings, attitudes and beliefs impact their teaching, an important step in the development of these programs is identification of teachers’ conceptualizations of CT and its role in science education as well as their perceived barriers to CT/science integration. Additionally, scholars have noted that teacher PD is more effective when it is tailored to the needs of participating teachers. To this end, this survey study examined secondary science teachers’ conceptualizations of CT, perceived barriers to CT/science integration, and the types of professional support they believe is needed to overcome these perceived barriers. Analysis of 123 open-ended surveys revealed that secondary science teachers: (1) conceptualize CT as a specific type of thinking that can be used to build science students’ problem-solving skills; (2) view their lack of CT understanding as a primary barrier to CT/science integration; (3) believe their students are academically unprepared for CT-infused science; and (4) want CT-PD focusing on the what, why, and how of CT/science integration. Drawing upon these findings, multiple implications for supporting science teachers in bringing CT-infused experiences to their students are provided.","PeriodicalId":47326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"391 - 414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2110068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recognizing that the power of computation has changed the practice of science, science education standards in a number of countries have included a call for the inclusion of computational thinking (CT) in K-12 science education. As CT is a relatively new construct, preparing inservice science teachers to implement CT-infused learning experiences depends on the creation of robust CT professional development (CT-PD) initiatives. Given that teachers’ understandings, attitudes and beliefs impact their teaching, an important step in the development of these programs is identification of teachers’ conceptualizations of CT and its role in science education as well as their perceived barriers to CT/science integration. Additionally, scholars have noted that teacher PD is more effective when it is tailored to the needs of participating teachers. To this end, this survey study examined secondary science teachers’ conceptualizations of CT, perceived barriers to CT/science integration, and the types of professional support they believe is needed to overcome these perceived barriers. Analysis of 123 open-ended surveys revealed that secondary science teachers: (1) conceptualize CT as a specific type of thinking that can be used to build science students’ problem-solving skills; (2) view their lack of CT understanding as a primary barrier to CT/science integration; (3) believe their students are academically unprepared for CT-infused science; and (4) want CT-PD focusing on the what, why, and how of CT/science integration. Drawing upon these findings, multiple implications for supporting science teachers in bringing CT-infused experiences to their students are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是计算思维?中学科学教师对计算思维的概念和对计算机思维整合的感知障碍
认识到计算的力量已经改变了科学实践,许多国家的科学教育标准都呼吁将计算思维(CT)纳入K-12科学教育。由于CT是一种相对较新的结构,准备在职科学教师实施CT注入的学习经验取决于建立健全的CT专业发展(CT- pd)计划。鉴于教师的理解、态度和信念会影响他们的教学,开发这些项目的一个重要步骤是确定教师对CT的概念及其在科学教育中的作用,以及他们对CT/科学整合的感知障碍。此外,学者们注意到,当教师PD根据参与教师的需求进行定制时,它会更有效。为此,本调查研究调查了中学科学教师对CT的概念、对CT/科学整合的感知障碍,以及他们认为克服这些感知障碍所需的专业支持类型。对123份开放式调查的分析表明,中学科学教师:(1)将CT概念化为一种特定类型的思维,可以用来培养理科生的问题解决能力;(2)认为他们缺乏对计算机科学的理解是计算机科学与科学融合的主要障碍;(3)认为他们的学生在学习上对ct科学没有准备;(4)希望CT- pd关注CT/科学整合的内容、原因和方式。根据这些发现,本文提供了支持科学教师将ct注入的经验带给学生的多重含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Journal of Science Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Science Teacher Education (JSTE) is the flagship journal of the Association for Science Teacher Education. It serves as a forum for disseminating high quality research and theoretical position papers concerning preservice and inservice education of science teachers. The Journal features pragmatic articles that offer ways to improve classroom teaching and learning, professional development, and teacher recruitment and retention at pre K-16 levels.
期刊最新文献
Where’s the Peanut Butter? Journaling about Science Practices in Everyday Life Integrating Text Structure Instruction in Science Education: A Design-Based Study What Makes this Lesson Engineering? What Makes it Science? Examining the Thought Processes of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Science Teacher Action Research in Top Tier Science Education Journals: A Review of the Literature Integrated Language and Science & Technology Instruction: A Cognitive Task Analysis of the Required Teacher Expertise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1