Associating multiple mycotoxin exposure and health outcomes: current statistical approaches and challenges

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY World Mycotoxin Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.3920/wmj2022.2784
N. Truong, K. Tesfamariam, L. Visintin, T. Goessens, S. de Saeger, C. Lachat, M. de Boevre
{"title":"Associating multiple mycotoxin exposure and health outcomes: current statistical approaches and challenges","authors":"N. Truong, K. Tesfamariam, L. Visintin, T. Goessens, S. de Saeger, C. Lachat, M. de Boevre","doi":"10.3920/wmj2022.2784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mycotoxin contamination is a global challenge to food safety and population health. A diversity of adverse effects in human health such as organ damage, immunity disorders and carcinogenesis are attributed to acute and chronic exposure to mycotoxins. While there is a high likelihood of mycotoxin co-occurrence in the daily diet, multiple mycotoxin exposures represent a considerable challenge in understanding the accumulative effects of groups of exposures on health outcomes. Nevertheless, previous studies on mycotoxin exposure-health outcome associations have focused on a single or a limited number of exposures. To guide multi-exposure assessment, careful considerations of statistical approaches available are required. In addition, the issue of multicollinearity in high-dimensional settings of multiple exposure analysis underlies the controversy surrounding the reliability and consistency of statistical conclusions about the exposure-health outcome associations. Conventional approaches such as generalised linear regressions (GLR) in conjunction with regularisation methods, including ridge regression, lasso and elastic net, offer some clear advantages in terms of results’ interpretation and model selection. However, when highly-correlated variables are observed, these methods have shown a low specificity in variable selection. Principal component analysis (PCA) that has been widely used as a dimensionality reduction technique also has the limitation to identify important predictor variables as this approach may overlook the associations between certain components and health outcomes. Recently, some alternative approaches have been introduced to address the issues of high dimensionality and highly-correlated data in the context of epidemiological and environmental research. Two of the noticeable approaches are weighted quantile sum regression (WQSR) and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR). Combining different methods of inference allows us to interpret the role of certain exposures, their interactions and the combined effects on human health under diverse statistical perspectives, which ultimately facilitate the construction of the toxicological profile of multiple mycotoxins’ exposure.","PeriodicalId":23844,"journal":{"name":"World Mycotoxin Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Mycotoxin Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/wmj2022.2784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycotoxin contamination is a global challenge to food safety and population health. A diversity of adverse effects in human health such as organ damage, immunity disorders and carcinogenesis are attributed to acute and chronic exposure to mycotoxins. While there is a high likelihood of mycotoxin co-occurrence in the daily diet, multiple mycotoxin exposures represent a considerable challenge in understanding the accumulative effects of groups of exposures on health outcomes. Nevertheless, previous studies on mycotoxin exposure-health outcome associations have focused on a single or a limited number of exposures. To guide multi-exposure assessment, careful considerations of statistical approaches available are required. In addition, the issue of multicollinearity in high-dimensional settings of multiple exposure analysis underlies the controversy surrounding the reliability and consistency of statistical conclusions about the exposure-health outcome associations. Conventional approaches such as generalised linear regressions (GLR) in conjunction with regularisation methods, including ridge regression, lasso and elastic net, offer some clear advantages in terms of results’ interpretation and model selection. However, when highly-correlated variables are observed, these methods have shown a low specificity in variable selection. Principal component analysis (PCA) that has been widely used as a dimensionality reduction technique also has the limitation to identify important predictor variables as this approach may overlook the associations between certain components and health outcomes. Recently, some alternative approaches have been introduced to address the issues of high dimensionality and highly-correlated data in the context of epidemiological and environmental research. Two of the noticeable approaches are weighted quantile sum regression (WQSR) and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR). Combining different methods of inference allows us to interpret the role of certain exposures, their interactions and the combined effects on human health under diverse statistical perspectives, which ultimately facilitate the construction of the toxicological profile of multiple mycotoxins’ exposure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将多种真菌毒素暴露与健康结果联系起来:当前的统计方法和挑战
真菌毒素污染是对食品安全和人群健康的全球性挑战。急性和慢性暴露于真菌毒素会对人体健康产生多种不良影响,如器官损伤、免疫障碍和致癌作用。虽然真菌毒素在日常饮食中共存的可能性很高,但多次暴露真菌毒素对理解暴露组对健康结果的累积影响是一个相当大的挑战。然而,先前关于真菌毒素暴露与健康结果关联的研究集中在单一或有限数量的暴露上。为了指导多重暴露评估,需要仔细考虑可用的统计方法。此外,多重暴露分析的高维环境中的多重共线性问题是围绕暴露-健康结果关联统计结论的可靠性和一致性的争议的基础。常规方法,如广义线性回归(GLR)和正则化方法,包括岭回归、套索和弹性网,在结果解释和模型选择方面提供了一些明显的优势。然而,当观察到高度相关的变量时,这些方法在变量选择中显示出较低的特异性。被广泛用作降维技术的主成分分析(PCA)在识别重要的预测变量方面也存在局限性,因为这种方法可能会忽略某些成分与健康结果之间的关联。最近,在流行病学和环境研究的背景下,引入了一些替代方法来解决高维度和高度相关的数据问题。两种值得注意的方法是加权分位数和回归(WQSR)和贝叶斯核机器回归(BKMR)。结合不同的推断方法,我们可以在不同的统计视角下解释某些暴露的作用、它们的相互作用以及对人类健康的综合影响,这最终有助于构建多种真菌毒素暴露的毒理学特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''World Mycotoxin Journal'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with only one specific area of focus: the promotion of the science of mycotoxins. The journal contains original research papers and critical reviews in all areas dealing with mycotoxins, together with opinions, a calendar of forthcoming mycotoxin-related events and book reviews. The journal takes a multidisciplinary approach, and it focuses on a broad spectrum of issues, including toxicology, risk assessment, worldwide occurrence, modelling and prediction of toxin formation, genomics, molecular biology for control of mycotoxigenic fungi, pre-and post-harvest prevention and control, sampling, analytical methodology and quality assurance, food technology, economics and regulatory issues. ''World Mycotoxin Journal'' is intended to serve the needs of researchers and professionals from the scientific community and industry, as well as of policy makers and regulators.
期刊最新文献
Occurrence and associated agronomic factors of mycotoxin contamination in silage maize in the Great Lakes region of the United States Aflatoxins in the nut chains: strategies to reduce their impact on consumer’s health and economic losses Developments in analytical techniques for mycotoxin determination: an update for 2022-23 Aflatoxin contamination of household stored grains for smallholder farmers in Dodoma, Tanzania Aflatoxin contamination of household stored grains for smallholder farmers in Dodoma, Tanzania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1