Revisiting Dependency and Development in the Age of Globalization

IF 0.8 Q1 HISTORY New Global Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1515/ngs-2023-0015
M. K. Özekin
{"title":"Revisiting Dependency and Development in the Age of Globalization","authors":"M. K. Özekin","doi":"10.1515/ngs-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Does dependency theory no longer offer an analytical and conceptual framework for the study of underdevelopment under the dynamics of modern globalization and the new international division of labor? Has the emergence of newly industrialized countries and a rising proportion of higher value-added manufacturing in the Global South cast the notions of subordination, peripherality, and dependence into the dustbin of history? These questions are today answered affirmatively by a broad consensus. In contrast to this widely-held assertion in the current development discourse, this study aims to bring these notions back to critical development studies by offering an up-to-date and analytically valid theorization of dependency in today’s Global South. Taking the historical-structural dependency perspective as a point of departure, the study revisits the notion of dependent development by drawing on a set of conceptual insights derived from Schumpeter’s theory of innovation, Global Value Chain analyses, and a class-relational articulation of the developmental state. In doing so, the study shows how core and periphery activities have clustered in time and space, leading to polarization in today’s global economy, and how new forms of dependency have been spatially reproduced along hierarchically-structured global value chains through the interplay of transnational corporations, states, and classes.","PeriodicalId":42013,"journal":{"name":"New Global Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Global Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2023-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Does dependency theory no longer offer an analytical and conceptual framework for the study of underdevelopment under the dynamics of modern globalization and the new international division of labor? Has the emergence of newly industrialized countries and a rising proportion of higher value-added manufacturing in the Global South cast the notions of subordination, peripherality, and dependence into the dustbin of history? These questions are today answered affirmatively by a broad consensus. In contrast to this widely-held assertion in the current development discourse, this study aims to bring these notions back to critical development studies by offering an up-to-date and analytically valid theorization of dependency in today’s Global South. Taking the historical-structural dependency perspective as a point of departure, the study revisits the notion of dependent development by drawing on a set of conceptual insights derived from Schumpeter’s theory of innovation, Global Value Chain analyses, and a class-relational articulation of the developmental state. In doing so, the study shows how core and periphery activities have clustered in time and space, leading to polarization in today’s global economy, and how new forms of dependency have been spatially reproduced along hierarchically-structured global value chains through the interplay of transnational corporations, states, and classes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视全球化时代的依赖与发展
依赖理论是否不再为研究现代全球化和新的国际分工动态下的欠发达提供一个分析和概念框架?新兴工业化国家的出现和全球南方高附加值制造业比例的上升,是否将从属、边缘和依赖的观念扔进了历史的垃圾箱?今天,这些问题得到了广泛的一致肯定的回答。与当前发展话语中广泛持有的这种主张相反,本研究旨在通过提供当今全球南方依赖的最新和分析有效的理论,将这些概念带回批判性发展研究中。本研究以历史结构依赖视角为出发点,借鉴熊彼特的创新理论、全球价值链分析和发展中国家的阶级关系阐述等一系列概念性见解,重新审视了依赖发展的概念。在此过程中,该研究展示了核心和外围活动如何在时间和空间上聚集,导致当今全球经济的两极分化,以及新形式的依赖如何通过跨国公司、国家和阶级的相互作用,沿着分层结构的全球价值链在空间上复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Of Mountains, Rivers, and Oceans: Geographic Effects on Military Expenditures, 1961–2012 Peter H. Russell. Sovereignty: The Biography of a Claim. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. 192pp. ISBN: 978–1487509095. $29.25 hardcover Theodor Tudoroiu. Globalizations from Below: The Normative Power of the World Social Forum, Ant Traders, Chinese Migrants, and Levantine Cosmopolitanism. New York: Routledge, 2023. 378pp. ISBN: 978–1032323718. £130.00 hardcover Compradors of China’s Global Power: The Colonialization of Hungarian and Nicaraguan Academia through Anti-imperialist Tropes Introduction: The Global 1970s from a History of Emotions Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1