Identifying important persons in the promotion of positive behaviour support (PBS) in disability services: A social network analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability Pub Date : 2021-11-18 DOI:10.3109/13668250.2021.1984084
B. Hayward, L. McKay‐Brown, S. Poed, K. Mcvilly
{"title":"Identifying important persons in the promotion of positive behaviour support (PBS) in disability services: A social network analysis","authors":"B. Hayward, L. McKay‐Brown, S. Poed, K. Mcvilly","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2021.1984084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Little is known about networks for positive behaviour support (PBS) in disability services. This study explores a PBS network to identify influential persons in its promotion and communication. Methods Quantitative sociometric methods were used to identify persons who occupy positions of either boundary spanning (those that link people and groups) and/or opinion leadership (those that are sought for advice). Results Nineteen persons were identified. Boundary spanners met all criteria for the position while opinion leaders did not. Conclusions This is the first published study of a PBS network in disability services and provides insights into persons involved in its systemic promotion. Boundary spanners are effectively bridging the PBS network, yet persons seeking information about PBS are doing so from opinion leaders that do not display a requisite characteristic for this role. These results have implications for the wider utility of PBS within disability service systems.","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2021.1984084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Little is known about networks for positive behaviour support (PBS) in disability services. This study explores a PBS network to identify influential persons in its promotion and communication. Methods Quantitative sociometric methods were used to identify persons who occupy positions of either boundary spanning (those that link people and groups) and/or opinion leadership (those that are sought for advice). Results Nineteen persons were identified. Boundary spanners met all criteria for the position while opinion leaders did not. Conclusions This is the first published study of a PBS network in disability services and provides insights into persons involved in its systemic promotion. Boundary spanners are effectively bridging the PBS network, yet persons seeking information about PBS are doing so from opinion leaders that do not display a requisite characteristic for this role. These results have implications for the wider utility of PBS within disability service systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别在残疾服务中促进积极行为支持的重要人物:社会网络分析
摘要背景目前对残障服务中的积极行为支持(PBS)网络知之甚少。本研究探讨了PBS网络在推广与传播中对影响力人物的识别。方法使用定量社会计量学方法来确定占据边界跨越(那些连接人和群体的人)和/或意见领导(那些寻求建议的人)职位的人。结果共鉴定出19人。边界制定者符合职位的所有标准,而意见领袖则不符合。这是首次发表的关于残疾人服务PBS网络的研究,并提供了对参与其系统推广的人员的见解。边界调整者有效地架起了PBS网络的桥梁,然而,寻求PBS信息的人是从意见领袖那里获取信息的,而这些意见领袖并没有表现出这一角色所必需的特征。这些结果对在残疾人服务系统中更广泛地使用PBS具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Family members use superficial justice information to evaluate performance of sheltered workshops: A warning about “cognitive shortcuts” The uniquely relational role of nurses during the closure of large residential institutions for people with intellectual disability in Australia: A qualitative study Relatives’ experiences of quality of healthcare services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in Sweden Interdisciplinarity and self-injury: Toward an inclusive research and treatment paradigm Reducing the risks of maltreatment of older adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Development of a research-based intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1