{"title":"The production of informal space: A critical atlas of housing informalities in Italy between public institutions and political strategies","authors":"Francesco Chiodelli , Alessandro Coppola , Emanuele Belotti , Gilda Berruti , Isabella Clough Marinaro , Francesco Curci , Federico Zanfi","doi":"10.1016/j.progress.2020.100495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper analyses the plurality of urban informal practices that characterize contemporary Italy in the sphere of housing, focusing on its complex connections with a variety of public institutions (e.g. laws, regulations, policies and practices). The paper discusses five cases of urban informality in Italy: the squatting of public housing in Milan; Roma camps in Rome; the <em>borgate romane</em> (large unauthorised neighbourhoods in the capital, which were built in the 1960s and 1970s and which have subsequently undergone a long and complex process of regularization); unauthorised construction, by the middle class, of second homes in coastal areas of Southern Italy; illegal subdivision of agricultural land as a standard mechanism for urban expansion in Casal di Principe, Naples.</p><p>From these cases emerges a complex picture of hybrid institutions that shape and govern housing informalities. These hybrid institutions are composed of multifaceted networks of actors, policies, practices and rules that exist in tension with each other and contribute to favouring and shaping the production of informal space in different ways (e.g. through their action, inaction and structural features). Against the backdrop of this varied institutional framework, a selective tolerance driven mainly by politically-mediated interests emerges as the distinctive feature of the public approach to housing informality in Italy.</p><p>The paper aims to develop an innovative research approach to informal housing in Italy by overcoming traditional boundaries between research ‘objects’ and by looking at political uses and forms of institutionalisation that are deployed across housing informalities. By doing so, it also contributes to the literature which analyses informality through the lenses of state theory. Simultaneously, it represents a call for international research to investigate the similarities in the patterns of housing informality – and their multifaceted politics – in Mediterranean welfare states.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47399,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Planning","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 100495"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.progress.2020.100495","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Planning","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305900620300167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
Abstract
The paper analyses the plurality of urban informal practices that characterize contemporary Italy in the sphere of housing, focusing on its complex connections with a variety of public institutions (e.g. laws, regulations, policies and practices). The paper discusses five cases of urban informality in Italy: the squatting of public housing in Milan; Roma camps in Rome; the borgate romane (large unauthorised neighbourhoods in the capital, which were built in the 1960s and 1970s and which have subsequently undergone a long and complex process of regularization); unauthorised construction, by the middle class, of second homes in coastal areas of Southern Italy; illegal subdivision of agricultural land as a standard mechanism for urban expansion in Casal di Principe, Naples.
From these cases emerges a complex picture of hybrid institutions that shape and govern housing informalities. These hybrid institutions are composed of multifaceted networks of actors, policies, practices and rules that exist in tension with each other and contribute to favouring and shaping the production of informal space in different ways (e.g. through their action, inaction and structural features). Against the backdrop of this varied institutional framework, a selective tolerance driven mainly by politically-mediated interests emerges as the distinctive feature of the public approach to housing informality in Italy.
The paper aims to develop an innovative research approach to informal housing in Italy by overcoming traditional boundaries between research ‘objects’ and by looking at political uses and forms of institutionalisation that are deployed across housing informalities. By doing so, it also contributes to the literature which analyses informality through the lenses of state theory. Simultaneously, it represents a call for international research to investigate the similarities in the patterns of housing informality – and their multifaceted politics – in Mediterranean welfare states.
本文分析了当代意大利住房领域的城市非正式实践的多样性,重点关注其与各种公共机构(如法律、法规、政策和实践)的复杂联系。本文讨论了意大利城市非正式性的五个案例:米兰公共住房的非法占用;罗马的罗姆人营地;borgate romane(首都的大型未经许可的社区,建于20世纪60年代和70年代,随后经历了漫长而复杂的正规化过程);中产阶级在意大利南部沿海地区擅自建造第二套住房;在那不勒斯的Casal di Principe,非法划分农业用地作为城市扩张的标准机制。从这些案例中,我们看到了一幅复杂的画面,即塑造和管理住房非正式性的混合机构。这些混合机构由行动者、政策、实践和规则的多方面网络组成,这些网络相互之间存在着紧张关系,并以不同的方式(例如通过它们的行动、不作为和结构特征)促进和塑造非正式空间的生产。在这种不同的制度框架的背景下,主要由政治介导的利益驱动的选择性容忍成为意大利住房非正式性公共方法的鲜明特征。该论文旨在通过克服研究“对象”之间的传统界限,并通过研究在住房非正式性中部署的政治用途和制度化形式,为意大利的非正式住房开发一种创新的研究方法。通过这样做,它也有助于通过国家理论的镜头来分析非正式性的文献。与此同时,它还呼吁进行国际研究,调查地中海福利国家住房非正规模式及其多面政治的相似性。
期刊介绍:
Progress in Planning is a multidisciplinary journal of research monographs offering a convenient and rapid outlet for extended papers in the field of spatial and environmental planning. Each issue comprises a single monograph of between 25,000 and 35,000 words. The journal is fully peer reviewed, has a global readership, and has been in publication since 1972.