The development of communication research in Indonesia in 2001-2020

Justito Adiprasetio
{"title":"The development of communication research in Indonesia in 2001-2020","authors":"Justito Adiprasetio","doi":"10.24198/jkk.v10i1.35954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"No systematic review and/or meta-analysis has attempted to map the macro and comprehensive landscape conditions, developments, and trends of communication research in Indonesia in the past few decades. Therefore, it is challenging to measure the progress that Indonesian communication scholars have achieved. This study analyzed 3108 articles distributed in reputable communication scientific publications in Indonesia, spanning two decades: January 2001 to March 2020. This study found many optimistic or skeptical justifications of Indonesian communication scholars about the development of communication epistemology in Indonesia. During the two decades, although there had been an increase in publications relying on quantitative approaches, it can be seen that the dominance of qualitative approaches was irreplaceable. The trend of increasing research using a quantitative approach was only a conversion from literature review articles widely published in the early 2000s. The Ministry of Communication and Information, Indonesia, in the second position, as the institution that contributes to the most authors of scientific articles after the Universitas Islam Bandung in the first place, and even surpassing Universitas Hasanuddin, Universitas Padjadjaran dan Universitas Diponegoro showing that the agency of state institutions is one of the active actors in communication knowledge production and reproduction in Indonesia. The increasing number of citations over the past two decades indicates that Indonesian scholars are experiencing enrichment of reference sources and interconnection with other scholars. However, based on keyword trends, Indonesian research’s deliberative and progressive vision has yet to appear dominant.","PeriodicalId":31891,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v10i1.35954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

No systematic review and/or meta-analysis has attempted to map the macro and comprehensive landscape conditions, developments, and trends of communication research in Indonesia in the past few decades. Therefore, it is challenging to measure the progress that Indonesian communication scholars have achieved. This study analyzed 3108 articles distributed in reputable communication scientific publications in Indonesia, spanning two decades: January 2001 to March 2020. This study found many optimistic or skeptical justifications of Indonesian communication scholars about the development of communication epistemology in Indonesia. During the two decades, although there had been an increase in publications relying on quantitative approaches, it can be seen that the dominance of qualitative approaches was irreplaceable. The trend of increasing research using a quantitative approach was only a conversion from literature review articles widely published in the early 2000s. The Ministry of Communication and Information, Indonesia, in the second position, as the institution that contributes to the most authors of scientific articles after the Universitas Islam Bandung in the first place, and even surpassing Universitas Hasanuddin, Universitas Padjadjaran dan Universitas Diponegoro showing that the agency of state institutions is one of the active actors in communication knowledge production and reproduction in Indonesia. The increasing number of citations over the past two decades indicates that Indonesian scholars are experiencing enrichment of reference sources and interconnection with other scholars. However, based on keyword trends, Indonesian research’s deliberative and progressive vision has yet to appear dominant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2001-2020年印尼传播学研究的发展
在过去的几十年里,没有系统的回顾和/或荟萃分析试图描绘出印度尼西亚传播研究的宏观和全面的景观条件、发展和趋势。因此,衡量印尼传播学学者所取得的进步具有挑战性。这项研究分析了印度尼西亚著名传播科学出版物上发表的3108篇文章,时间跨度为二十年:2001年1月至2020年3月。本研究发现印尼传播学者对印尼传播认识论的发展有许多乐观或怀疑的理由。在这二十年中,虽然依靠定量方法的出版物有所增加,但可以看出,定性方法的主导地位是不可替代的。越来越多的研究使用定量方法的趋势只是从21世纪初广泛发表的文献综述文章的转变。印度尼西亚的通信和信息部位居第二,是继Universitas Islam Bandung之后贡献了最多科学文章作者的机构,甚至超过了Universitas Hasanuddin, Universitas Padjadjaran和Universitas Diponegoro,这表明国家机构的机构是印度尼西亚传播知识生产和再生产的积极参与者之一。在过去的二十年中,越来越多的引用表明印度尼西亚学者正在经历参考来源的丰富和与其他学者的相互联系。然而,从关键词趋势来看,印尼研究的审议和进步愿景尚未显现出主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intrapersonal communication about the meaning of early marriage in Bandung City Audience consumption motives on online celebrity gossip account’s contents Framing analysis of Anies Baswedan as an Indonesian presidential candidate in the sacrificial cow numbered 024 case Communication and cultural inheritance through a traditional school in Dangiang Village, Garut Communication approach of Gopay’s digital alms platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1