Reported Speech as Persuasion: A Discourse Analysis of Japanese Journalism

IF 0.4 Q3 AREA STUDIES Japanese Studies Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/10371397.2021.1947788
Masaki Shibata
{"title":"Reported Speech as Persuasion: A Discourse Analysis of Japanese Journalism","authors":"Masaki Shibata","doi":"10.1080/10371397.2021.1947788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Reported speech can be defined as a form of communication by which speakers bring external voices into their own utterances. Recent studies have also found that reported speech has a persuasive function in presenting an external voice as either factual or contentious in order to support a speaker’s own arguments and refute alternative points of view. Such persuasion can be achieved by, for example, deploying factual/non-factual reporting verbs, or evaluating external sources or propositions. While the persuasive function of reported speech has been extensively studied for English, such studies are not widely available for Japanese. The present article investigates the grammatical forms of reported speech, including reporting verbs and evaluative language, to reveal how reported speech realises persuasive functions in Japanese. Seventy-four online news editorials are analysed to show that, regardless of which reporting verbs or grammatical forms are deployed, in Japanese the reported proposition cannot be construed as factual or contentious without including a negative or positive evaluation of the external voice. This result, different from what has been proposed for English, also cautions against the automatic use of an English-influenced framework for the discourse analysis of multiple languages.","PeriodicalId":44839,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"221 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10371397.2021.1947788","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2021.1947788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reported speech can be defined as a form of communication by which speakers bring external voices into their own utterances. Recent studies have also found that reported speech has a persuasive function in presenting an external voice as either factual or contentious in order to support a speaker’s own arguments and refute alternative points of view. Such persuasion can be achieved by, for example, deploying factual/non-factual reporting verbs, or evaluating external sources or propositions. While the persuasive function of reported speech has been extensively studied for English, such studies are not widely available for Japanese. The present article investigates the grammatical forms of reported speech, including reporting verbs and evaluative language, to reveal how reported speech realises persuasive functions in Japanese. Seventy-four online news editorials are analysed to show that, regardless of which reporting verbs or grammatical forms are deployed, in Japanese the reported proposition cannot be construed as factual or contentious without including a negative or positive evaluation of the external voice. This result, different from what has been proposed for English, also cautions against the automatic use of an English-influenced framework for the discourse analysis of multiple languages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为说服的报道言语——日本新闻学的语篇分析
摘要报告言语可以定义为一种交际形式,通过这种交际方式,说话人将外部声音引入自己的话语中。最近的研究还发现,报道的演讲具有说服作用,可以将外部声音呈现为事实或有争议的声音,以支持演讲者自己的论点并反驳其他观点。这种说服可以通过使用事实/非事实报告动词,或评估外部来源或命题来实现。虽然报告言语的说服功能在英语中已经得到了广泛的研究,但在日语中还没有得到广泛的研究。本文研究了日语报告语的语法形式,包括报告动词和评价语言,以揭示报告语在日语中是如何实现说服功能的。对74篇在线新闻社论进行了分析,结果表明,无论使用哪种报道动词或语法形式,在日语中,如果不包括对外部声音的负面或正面评价,所报道的命题都不能被解释为事实或有争议的。这一结果与针对英语提出的结果不同,也提醒人们不要自动使用受英语影响的框架来进行多种语言的语篇分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Studies
Japanese Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drift and Modernity: On Mid-Twentieth Century Japanese Intellectual Discourses Towards Sustainable Practices of Diversity and Inclusion of SOGIESC in Japanese Language Education & Japanese Studies Drugs and the Politics of Consumption in Japan Hokkaido Dairy Farm: Cosmopolitics of Otherness and Security on the Frontiers of Japan Systemic Silencing: Activism, Memory and Sexual Violence in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1