The negative relationships between employee resilience and ambiguity, complexity, and inter-agency collaboration

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Australian Journal of Public Administration Pub Date : 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1111/1467-8500.12587
Geoff Plimmer, Joana Kuntz, Evan Berman, Sanna Malinen, Katharina Näswall, Esme Franken
{"title":"The negative relationships between employee resilience and ambiguity, complexity, and inter-agency collaboration","authors":"Geoff Plimmer,&nbsp;Joana Kuntz,&nbsp;Evan Berman,&nbsp;Sanna Malinen,&nbsp;Katharina Näswall,&nbsp;Esme Franken","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Employee resilience (ER) is often needed to face demands inherent in public sector work. Some types of demands, however, may hinder its development, rather than provide the type of challenging adversity from which resilience can develop. Public sector job demands have been a long-standing issue for public workplaces and employees but are also growing in salience as organisations face an increasingly variable, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous environment. Drawing on the Job Demands–Resources model and the challenge/hindrance stress literature, this multi-level study of Aotearoa New Zealand civil servants (<i>n</i> = 11,533) in 65 public sector organisations shows that ER is negatively affected by demands such as job insecurity, unclear job and organisational goals, and inter-agency collaboration. However, organisational resource constraints are positively associated with ER. This study identifies core PA job and organisational demands that hinder ER and offers practical implications and suggestions for further research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Job role ambiguity, job insecurity, unclear organisational goals, and inter-agency collaboration are common job and organisational demands in public sector workplaces.</li>\n \n <li>For employees, these demands are stressors that employees do not feel they control, and may therefore hinder employee resilience: the ability to learn, adapt, and leverage networks in the face of challenges.</li>\n \n <li>Surprisingly, resource constraints, where employees have to ‘do more with less’, might help employees develop ER.</li>\n \n <li>While inter-agency collaboration has potentially many benefits, it appears to have negative spillover effects on employees unaware of it or not involved in it.</li>\n \n <li>To encourage ER, agencies should clarify both organisational and job goals, and assure job security, control, competency development, and supervisor support.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12587","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Employee resilience (ER) is often needed to face demands inherent in public sector work. Some types of demands, however, may hinder its development, rather than provide the type of challenging adversity from which resilience can develop. Public sector job demands have been a long-standing issue for public workplaces and employees but are also growing in salience as organisations face an increasingly variable, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous environment. Drawing on the Job Demands–Resources model and the challenge/hindrance stress literature, this multi-level study of Aotearoa New Zealand civil servants (n = 11,533) in 65 public sector organisations shows that ER is negatively affected by demands such as job insecurity, unclear job and organisational goals, and inter-agency collaboration. However, organisational resource constraints are positively associated with ER. This study identifies core PA job and organisational demands that hinder ER and offers practical implications and suggestions for further research.

Points for practitioners

  • Job role ambiguity, job insecurity, unclear organisational goals, and inter-agency collaboration are common job and organisational demands in public sector workplaces.
  • For employees, these demands are stressors that employees do not feel they control, and may therefore hinder employee resilience: the ability to learn, adapt, and leverage networks in the face of challenges.
  • Surprisingly, resource constraints, where employees have to ‘do more with less’, might help employees develop ER.
  • While inter-agency collaboration has potentially many benefits, it appears to have negative spillover effects on employees unaware of it or not involved in it.
  • To encourage ER, agencies should clarify both organisational and job goals, and assure job security, control, competency development, and supervisor support.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
员工弹性与模糊性、复杂性和机构间合作的负向关系
员工弹性(ER)往往需要面对公共部门工作固有的需求。然而,某些类型的需求可能会阻碍它的发展,而不是提供一种具有挑战性的逆境,从而使弹性得以发展。公共部门的工作需求一直是公共工作场所和员工长期存在的问题,但随着组织面临日益变化、不确定、复杂和模糊的环境,这一问题也日益突出。利用工作需求-资源模型和挑战/障碍压力文献,这项对新西兰奥特罗阿65个公共部门组织的公务员(n = 11533)的多层次研究表明,ER受到诸如工作不安全感、工作和组织目标不明确以及机构间合作等需求的负面影响。然而,组织资源约束与ER呈正相关。本研究确定了阻碍ER的核心PA工作和组织需求,并为进一步研究提供了实际意义和建议。工作角色模糊、工作不安全、组织目标不明确、机构间协作是公共部门工作场所常见的工作和组织需求。对于员工来说,这些需求是他们无法控制的压力源,因此可能会阻碍员工的弹性:面对挑战时学习、适应和利用网络的能力。令人惊讶的是,资源限制,员工不得不“用更少的钱做更多的事”,可能有助于员工发展急诊室。虽然机构间合作有许多潜在的好处,但它似乎对不知情或未参与其中的员工产生了负面的溢出效应。为了鼓励ER,机构应该明确组织和工作目标,并确保工作保障、控制、能力发展和主管支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge brokering for public sector reform ‘We're trying to get out of here, that's what we're doing’: A Bourdieusian examination of ‘choice’ in the National Disability Insurance Scheme Knowing what not to know: Unravelling the dynamics of selective knowledge in government policymaking Cabinetisation or a Westminster solution? Understanding the employment of public servants in Australian ministers’ offices Issue Information - TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1