Intimidation or harassment among family medicine residents in Saskatchewan: a cross-sectional survey.

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2023-11-08 eCollection Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.75364
André Coleman, Olivia Reis, Adam Clay, Vivian R Ramsden, Kaitlyn Hughes
{"title":"Intimidation or harassment among family medicine residents in Saskatchewan: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"André Coleman, Olivia Reis, Adam Clay, Vivian R Ramsden, Kaitlyn Hughes","doi":"10.36834/cmej.75364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Up to 98% of practicing family physicians, and over 75% of resident physicians in Canada experience abusive incidents. Despite the negative consequences of abusive incidents, few residents report these events to their supervisors or institution. We sought to estimate the prevalence of abusive incidents experienced or witnessed by Saskatchewan family medicine residents (FMRs) and identify their responses to these events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymous survey invitations were emailed to all 110 Saskatchewan FMRs in Saskatchewan in November and December 2020. Demographic characteristics, frequency of witnessed and experienced abusive incidents, sources of incidents and residents' responses were collected. Incidents were classified as minor, major, severe, or as racial discrimination based on a previously published classification system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 34.5% (38/110). Ninety-two percent (35/38) of residents witnessed a minor incident and 91.7% (32/36) of residents experienced a minor incident. Seventy-one percent (27/38) of residents witnessed racial discrimination while 19.4% (7/36) of residents experienced racial discrimination. Patients were the most common source of abusive incidents. Twenty-nine percent of residents reported abusive incidents to their supervisors. Most residents were aware of institutional reporting policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most Saskatchewan FMRs experienced or witnessed abusive incidents, but few were reported. This study provided the opportunity to reassess policies on abusive incidents, which should consider sources of abuse, confidence in reporting, and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Up to 98% of practicing family physicians, and over 75% of resident physicians in Canada experience abusive incidents. Despite the negative consequences of abusive incidents, few residents report these events to their supervisors or institution. We sought to estimate the prevalence of abusive incidents experienced or witnessed by Saskatchewan family medicine residents (FMRs) and identify their responses to these events.

Methods: Anonymous survey invitations were emailed to all 110 Saskatchewan FMRs in Saskatchewan in November and December 2020. Demographic characteristics, frequency of witnessed and experienced abusive incidents, sources of incidents and residents' responses were collected. Incidents were classified as minor, major, severe, or as racial discrimination based on a previously published classification system.

Results: The response rate was 34.5% (38/110). Ninety-two percent (35/38) of residents witnessed a minor incident and 91.7% (32/36) of residents experienced a minor incident. Seventy-one percent (27/38) of residents witnessed racial discrimination while 19.4% (7/36) of residents experienced racial discrimination. Patients were the most common source of abusive incidents. Twenty-nine percent of residents reported abusive incidents to their supervisors. Most residents were aware of institutional reporting policies.

Conclusions: Most Saskatchewan FMRs experienced or witnessed abusive incidents, but few were reported. This study provided the opportunity to reassess policies on abusive incidents, which should consider sources of abuse, confidence in reporting, and education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萨斯喀彻温省家庭医疗居民中的恐吓或骚扰:一项横断面调查
简介:在加拿大,高达98%的执业家庭医生和超过75%的住院医生经历过虐待事件。尽管虐待事件会产生负面影响,但很少有居民向他们的主管或机构报告这些事件。我们试图估计萨斯喀彻温省家庭医疗居民(FMRs)经历或目睹的虐待事件的发生率,并确定他们对这些事件的反应。方法:于2020年11月和12月通过电子邮件向萨斯喀彻温省所有110名FMRs发送匿名调查邀请。收集了人口统计学特征、目睹和经历虐待事件的频率、事件来源和居民的反应。根据先前公布的分类系统,事件被分为轻微、严重、严重或种族歧视。结果:有效率为34.5%(38/110)。92%(35/38)的居民目睹了轻微事件,91.7%(32/36)的居民经历了轻微事件。71%(27/38)的居民遭受过种族歧视,19.4%(7/36)的居民遭受过种族歧视。病人是虐待事件最常见的来源。29%的居民向他们的主管报告了虐待事件。大多数居民都知道机构的报告政策。结论:大多数萨斯喀彻温省FMRs经历或目睹了虐待事件,但很少有报道。这项研究为重新评估虐待事件的政策提供了机会,这些政策应考虑虐待的来源、报告的信心和教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Everything new is happening all at once": a qualitative study of early career obstetrician and gynaecologists' preparedness for independent practice. Walk with a Future Doc program allows Canadian medical students to promote physical activity and health education in local communities. 'What would my peers say?' Comparing the opinion-based method with the prediction-based method in Continuing Medical Education course evaluation. Centring equity in medicine: pushback to challenging power. Educational approaches for social accountability in health professions training: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1