What can we learn about social media influence in the Malaysian 14th General Election?

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION Journal of Asian Pacific Communication Pub Date : 2019-08-06 DOI:10.1075/JAPC.00033.RAH
S. Rahim
{"title":"What can we learn about social media influence in the Malaysian 14th General Election?","authors":"S. Rahim","doi":"10.1075/JAPC.00033.RAH","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Social media as a new tool for political communication influences current developments in political campaigning.\n In combination with mainstream media, social media is increasingly used for purposes such as political marketing, mobilisation of\n voters, and public debate. This paper discusses how social media helped the Malaysian main opposition coalition, Alliance of Hope\n (PH), to topple the ruling party, National Front (BN), which had ruled Malaysia for the last 61 years. Literature on new media\n rarely shows positive relationships between new media usage and voting decisions. At most, social media plays a crucial role in\n extending the dissemination of information to voters. However, PH had to rely solely on social media for their political marketing\n in reaching out to both urban and rural constituencies, as the coalition was denied access to the government-controlled mainstream\n media. With data-based information, PH was able to segment voters and focus on marginalised constituencies, young voters,\n middle-class urban voters, and rural constituencies, which were the ruling party’s main fortress, contributing to 57% of the vote.\n One of the misconceptions many politicians and political parties have is that merely using social media will win them the\n election. Ultimately, what mattered more in this case was whether political parties could register the currents of change\n percolating within an evolving Malaysian society and address voter grievances accordingly, something that BN, even with control\n over mainstream media and superior usage of social media, did not do.","PeriodicalId":43807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Pacific Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Pacific Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JAPC.00033.RAH","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Social media as a new tool for political communication influences current developments in political campaigning. In combination with mainstream media, social media is increasingly used for purposes such as political marketing, mobilisation of voters, and public debate. This paper discusses how social media helped the Malaysian main opposition coalition, Alliance of Hope (PH), to topple the ruling party, National Front (BN), which had ruled Malaysia for the last 61 years. Literature on new media rarely shows positive relationships between new media usage and voting decisions. At most, social media plays a crucial role in extending the dissemination of information to voters. However, PH had to rely solely on social media for their political marketing in reaching out to both urban and rural constituencies, as the coalition was denied access to the government-controlled mainstream media. With data-based information, PH was able to segment voters and focus on marginalised constituencies, young voters, middle-class urban voters, and rural constituencies, which were the ruling party’s main fortress, contributing to 57% of the vote. One of the misconceptions many politicians and political parties have is that merely using social media will win them the election. Ultimately, what mattered more in this case was whether political parties could register the currents of change percolating within an evolving Malaysian society and address voter grievances accordingly, something that BN, even with control over mainstream media and superior usage of social media, did not do.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们可以从社交媒体对马来西亚第十四届全国大选的影响中学到什么?
社交媒体作为一种新的政治传播工具,影响着当前政治竞选的发展。与主流媒体相结合,社交媒体越来越多地用于政治营销、动员选民和公共辩论等目的。本文讨论社交媒体如何帮助马来西亚主要反对党联盟希望联盟(Alliance of Hope, PH)推翻统治马来西亚61年的执政党国民阵线(National Front, BN)。关于新媒体的文献很少显示新媒体使用与投票决策之间的正相关关系。至多,社交媒体在向选民传播信息方面发挥了至关重要的作用。然而,希盟不得不完全依靠社交媒体来进行政治营销,以接触城市和农村选区,因为联盟无法进入政府控制的主流媒体。凭借基于数据的信息,希盟能够细分选民,并将重点放在边缘化选区、年轻选民、中产阶级城市选民和农村选区,这些选区是执政党的主要堡垒,贡献了57%的选票。许多政治家和政党的一个误解是,仅仅使用社交媒体就能赢得选举。最终,在这个案例中,更重要的是,政党是否能够记录在不断演变的马来西亚社会中渗透的变革潮流,并相应地解决选民的不满,这是国阵未能做到的,即使它控制着主流媒体,并在社交媒体上拥有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The journal’s academic orientation is generalist, passionately committed to interdisciplinary approaches to language and communication studies in the Asian Pacific. Thematic issues of previously published issues of JAPC include Cross-Cultural Communications: Literature, Language, Ideas; Sociolinguistics in China; Japan Communication Issues; Mass Media in the Asian Pacific; Comic Art in Asia, Historical Literacy, and Political Roots; Communication Gains through Student Exchanges & Study Abroad; Language Issues in Malaysia; English Language Development in East Asia; The Teachings of Writing in the Pacific Basin; Language and Identity in Asia; The Economics of Language in the Asian Pacific.
期刊最新文献
A Welcome and Farwell Message Review of Lent & Ying (2023): Comics Art in China Local language in the context of political divides Review of Xu (2021): Silencing Shanghai – Language and Identity in Urban China “I am who I am”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1