New Political Empowerment: Transcending Discourse Contestation between Caring versus Subjugation

A. Tohari
{"title":"New Political Empowerment: Transcending Discourse Contestation between Caring versus Subjugation","authors":"A. Tohari","doi":"10.15294/IPSR.V5I3.22832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on political empowerment discourse between caring politics versus subjugation politics. Through a literature study on empowerment, the writer finds that the empowerment realm has been in a tension between a group that perceives it as a caring action against another group that understands it as a subjugation. Each group has been developing arguments that support their perspective on empowerment. For the group that supports the idea of empowerment as caring action, the most important thing is an achievement. They are scrutinizing the indicators of success and failure, best practices, lessons learned, and many others. On the other hand, the group that views empowerment as subjugation considers it is inherently oppressive. Empowerment is nothing more than a veil that covers the power interest in disciplining poor people to conform to certain standards. Therefore, it is imperative to have a more transformative paradigm to see empowerment as emancipatory politics.","PeriodicalId":53373,"journal":{"name":"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politik Indonesia Indonesian Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/IPSR.V5I3.22832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on political empowerment discourse between caring politics versus subjugation politics. Through a literature study on empowerment, the writer finds that the empowerment realm has been in a tension between a group that perceives it as a caring action against another group that understands it as a subjugation. Each group has been developing arguments that support their perspective on empowerment. For the group that supports the idea of empowerment as caring action, the most important thing is an achievement. They are scrutinizing the indicators of success and failure, best practices, lessons learned, and many others. On the other hand, the group that views empowerment as subjugation considers it is inherently oppressive. Empowerment is nothing more than a veil that covers the power interest in disciplining poor people to conform to certain standards. Therefore, it is imperative to have a more transformative paradigm to see empowerment as emancipatory politics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新政治赋权:超越关怀与征服之间的话语争论
本文关注的是关怀政治与征服政治之间的政治赋权话语。通过对授权的文献研究,作者发现授权领域一直处于一种紧张状态,一个群体将其视为一种关怀行动,另一个群体将其视为一种征服。每个群体都在发展自己的论点,以支持他们对赋权的看法。对于支持将赋权视为关怀行动的团体来说,最重要的是取得成就。他们仔细审查成功和失败的指标、最佳实践、吸取的教训以及许多其他因素。另一方面,把权力视为征服的群体认为它本质上是压迫性的。赋予权力只不过是一层面纱,它掩盖了约束穷人遵守某些标准的权力利益。因此,必须有一个更具变革性的范式,将赋权视为解放政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Regional Regulations on Handling Homelessness and Beggars in Palu City OPEN GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION DURING THE PANDEMIC: LESSON – LEARNED FROM SURAKARTA CITY GOVERNMENT The Character of Electronic-Based Government System in Medium-Term Cities or Regencies Development Planning in the Province of Central Java in 2021-2026 ACTORS' APPROACH IN THE DISCOURSE OF REJECTING THE THRESHOLD FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDACY IN GENERAL ELECTIONS IN INDONESIA Kepemimpinan Publik: Perspektif Kepala Desa di Kabupaten Kebumen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1