An audit of the labour epidural analgesia service at a regional hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2018-12-03 DOI:10.7196/SAJOG.1314
T. Leonard, H. Perrie, J. Scribante, S. Chetty
{"title":"An audit of the labour epidural analgesia service at a regional hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa","authors":"T. Leonard, H. Perrie, J. Scribante, S. Chetty","doi":"10.7196/SAJOG.1314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Neuraxial analgesia in the form of a labour epidural has been shown to be the most effective analgesic strategy for the labouring mother. In developed countries, data are readily available as to the number of women receiving labour epidural analgesia, as well as the complication rates of labour epidurals. However, data for South Africa (SA) on labour epidural analgesia services are limited, and there were no published data for Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital (RMMCH), Johannesburg, SA.  Objective. To describe the labour epidural analgesia service at RMMCH over the period of 1 year.  Methods. A retrospective audit using consecutive convenience sampling was done reviewing all epidural records at RMMCH from 1 January to 31 December 2014.  Results. During the study period, labour epidural analgesia was administered for 187 (1.6%) of 11 853 deliveries. Epidural records were collected for all administered labour epidurals. The most common indications documented were labour analgesia (41.7%) and primigravida (28.9%). Labour epidurals were not administered for specific medical conditions. The incidence of complications was 22.6%, and these were minor and self-limiting. Hypotension was the most common complication (12.3%). Patient satisfaction with labour epidural analgesia, where documented, was high (98.4%).  Conclusion. This audit revealed a low incidence of labour epidural analgesia at RMMCH during the study period. The incidence of complications was in keeping with that seen in developed countries. Poor documentation was noted to be a problem.","PeriodicalId":49579,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAJOG.1314","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJOG.1314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background. Neuraxial analgesia in the form of a labour epidural has been shown to be the most effective analgesic strategy for the labouring mother. In developed countries, data are readily available as to the number of women receiving labour epidural analgesia, as well as the complication rates of labour epidurals. However, data for South Africa (SA) on labour epidural analgesia services are limited, and there were no published data for Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital (RMMCH), Johannesburg, SA.  Objective. To describe the labour epidural analgesia service at RMMCH over the period of 1 year.  Methods. A retrospective audit using consecutive convenience sampling was done reviewing all epidural records at RMMCH from 1 January to 31 December 2014.  Results. During the study period, labour epidural analgesia was administered for 187 (1.6%) of 11 853 deliveries. Epidural records were collected for all administered labour epidurals. The most common indications documented were labour analgesia (41.7%) and primigravida (28.9%). Labour epidurals were not administered for specific medical conditions. The incidence of complications was 22.6%, and these were minor and self-limiting. Hypotension was the most common complication (12.3%). Patient satisfaction with labour epidural analgesia, where documented, was high (98.4%).  Conclusion. This audit revealed a low incidence of labour epidural analgesia at RMMCH during the study period. The incidence of complications was in keeping with that seen in developed countries. Poor documentation was noted to be a problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对南非豪登省一家地区医院分娩硬膜外镇痛服务的审计
背景分娩硬膜外神经轴镇痛已被证明是分娩母亲最有效的镇痛策略。在发达国家,关于接受硬膜外分娩镇痛的妇女人数以及硬膜外分娩并发症发生率的数据很容易获得。然而,南非(SA)关于分娩硬膜外镇痛服务的数据有限,南非约翰内斯堡Rahima Moosa母婴医院(RMMCH)也没有公布数据。目的。描述RMMCH分娩硬膜外镇痛服务1年的情况。方法。采用连续方便抽样进行回顾性审计,审查2014年1月1日至12月31日RMMCH的所有硬膜外记录。结果。在研究期间,11853例分娩中有187例(1.6%)采用了分娩硬膜外镇痛。收集所有分娩硬膜外用药的硬膜外记录。最常见的适应症是分娩镇痛(41.7%)和初产妇(28.9%)。分娩硬膜外药物不是针对特定的医疗条件使用的。并发症的发生率为22.6%,这些并发症都是轻微的、自限性的。低血压是最常见的并发症(12.3%)。患者对分娩硬膜外镇痛的满意度很高(98.4%)。结论。该审计显示,在研究期间,RMMCH分娩硬膜外镇痛的发生率较低。并发症的发生率与发达国家一致。有人指出,文件不齐全是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAJOG is a tri-annual, general specialist obstetrics and gynaecology journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. The journal carries original research articles, editorials, clinical practice, personal opinion, South Africa health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Is medicine a process of scientific rigour? How to care for fetuses with prenatally diagnosed severe abnormalities Prevalence of and sociodemographic factors associated with antenatal depression among women in Limpopo Province, South Africa Age-related changes in serum anti-Müllerian hormone in women of reproductive age in Kenya An assessment of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian tumours at a public hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1