Yunqiu Liu, H. Geng, Liying Zheng, Tianyu Cao, Weicun Liu, Zhenyan Chen, Liye Wang, Chunxia Xiu, Lu Song, Baoli Chen, X. Lan
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Astograph Airway Responsiveness Measurement in Chest Suffocation Variant Asthma","authors":"Yunqiu Liu, H. Geng, Liying Zheng, Tianyu Cao, Weicun Liu, Zhenyan Chen, Liye Wang, Chunxia Xiu, Lu Song, Baoli Chen, X. Lan","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6315.2019.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the diagnostic value of Astograph methacholine provocation test in patients with chest tightness variant asthma(CTVA). \n \n \nMethods \nFrom January 2011 to February 2017, 156 patients with CTVA in outpatient or inpatient department of respiratory medicine of Kailuan General Hospital affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology were selected as case group (chest tightness variant asthma group). The control group were 361 non-asthmatic patients including interstitial lung disease(23 cases), coronary disease (157 cases), hypertensive cardiopathy(22 cases), myocardiosis (16 cases), congenital heart disease (3 cases), rheumatic valvular heart disease (6 cases), central airway disease (3 cases), thyromegaly (10 cases), mediastinal tumor (5 cases), thoracic or spinal deformity (8 cases), phrenoparalysis (2 cases) and vegetative nerve functional disturbance (106 cases). All participants received pulmonay ventilation test, average daily and nightly variation rate of PEF(Peak expiratory flow) or PEF weekly variability, Astograph methacholine provocation test (forced expirataory volume in one second≥70% expectation), and other relevant examinations.The diagnostic value of Astograph methacholine provocation test on CTVA was assessed by analyzing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Yunden index of Astograph methacholine airway. \n \n \nResults \nCompared with the control group((1.18±0.44)%), theforced expiratory flow from 75% of Forced vital capcacity (FEF75)index of CTVA group((1.29±0.50)%) had significant difference(, t=2.96, P=0.006). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Yunden index, and diagnostic accuracy of Astograph methacholine provocation test on CTVA were 0.814, 0.695, 0.536, 0.305, 0.509 and 0.731, respectively. \n \n \nConclusion \nThe sensitivity, negative predictive value, Yunden index and diagnostic accuracy of Astograph methacholine provocation test on CTVA were higher, whereas the specificity and positive predictive value were relatively lower, suggesting that Astograph methacholine provocation test had a reliable diagnostic value on CTVA, with lower false negative and higher false positive. \n \n \nKey words: \nAstograph method; Chest tightness variant asthma; Diagnosis","PeriodicalId":10365,"journal":{"name":"中国综合临床","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国综合临床","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6315.2019.04.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the diagnostic value of Astograph methacholine provocation test in patients with chest tightness variant asthma(CTVA).
Methods
From January 2011 to February 2017, 156 patients with CTVA in outpatient or inpatient department of respiratory medicine of Kailuan General Hospital affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology were selected as case group (chest tightness variant asthma group). The control group were 361 non-asthmatic patients including interstitial lung disease(23 cases), coronary disease (157 cases), hypertensive cardiopathy(22 cases), myocardiosis (16 cases), congenital heart disease (3 cases), rheumatic valvular heart disease (6 cases), central airway disease (3 cases), thyromegaly (10 cases), mediastinal tumor (5 cases), thoracic or spinal deformity (8 cases), phrenoparalysis (2 cases) and vegetative nerve functional disturbance (106 cases). All participants received pulmonay ventilation test, average daily and nightly variation rate of PEF(Peak expiratory flow) or PEF weekly variability, Astograph methacholine provocation test (forced expirataory volume in one second≥70% expectation), and other relevant examinations.The diagnostic value of Astograph methacholine provocation test on CTVA was assessed by analyzing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Yunden index of Astograph methacholine airway.
Results
Compared with the control group((1.18±0.44)%), theforced expiratory flow from 75% of Forced vital capcacity (FEF75)index of CTVA group((1.29±0.50)%) had significant difference(, t=2.96, P=0.006). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Yunden index, and diagnostic accuracy of Astograph methacholine provocation test on CTVA were 0.814, 0.695, 0.536, 0.305, 0.509 and 0.731, respectively.
Conclusion
The sensitivity, negative predictive value, Yunden index and diagnostic accuracy of Astograph methacholine provocation test on CTVA were higher, whereas the specificity and positive predictive value were relatively lower, suggesting that Astograph methacholine provocation test had a reliable diagnostic value on CTVA, with lower false negative and higher false positive.
Key words:
Astograph method; Chest tightness variant asthma; Diagnosis
期刊介绍:
Clinical Medicine of China is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association (CMA), which mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and commentaries in the field.
Clinical Medicine of China is a source journal of Peking University (2000 and 2004 editions), a core journal of Chinese science and technology, an academic journal of RCCSE China Core (Extended Edition), and has been published in Chemical Abstracts of the United States (CA), Abstracts Journal of Russia (AJ), Chinese Core Journals (Selection) Database, Chinese Science and Technology Materials Directory, Wanfang Database, China Academic Journal Database, JST Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (Japanese) (2018) and other databases.