Survivors of Witch Trials and the Quest for Justice in Early Modern Germany

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.1215/10829636-8219590
David Aers, Sarah Beckwith, Daniel Jütte
{"title":"Survivors of Witch Trials and the Quest for Justice in Early Modern Germany","authors":"David Aers, Sarah Beckwith, Daniel Jütte","doi":"10.1215/10829636-8219590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the trauma that early modern witchcraft trials inflicted on survivors and their communities. The point of departure is the case of Margareth Los, a widow accused of witchcraft in 1520s Württemberg. Subjected to brutal torture, Los was acquitted provisionally after three years in jail. Remarkably, she had the strength to produce an account of her ordeal and to bring her case before the highest court of justice in the Empire. The historical literature on witch trials has long been polarized by the quest for the most “accurate” death tolls. However, the social cost of witch hunts cannot be assessed by the number of death sentences alone. As Los’s case illustrates, witch hunts often had inconclusive outcomes, leaving the accused in a legal limbo that could last for years or even decades. Only one outcome was always the same: witch trials left behind a population of uprooted, dispossessed, and traumatized individuals.","PeriodicalId":51901,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES","volume":"50 1","pages":"349-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-8219590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores the trauma that early modern witchcraft trials inflicted on survivors and their communities. The point of departure is the case of Margareth Los, a widow accused of witchcraft in 1520s Württemberg. Subjected to brutal torture, Los was acquitted provisionally after three years in jail. Remarkably, she had the strength to produce an account of her ordeal and to bring her case before the highest court of justice in the Empire. The historical literature on witch trials has long been polarized by the quest for the most “accurate” death tolls. However, the social cost of witch hunts cannot be assessed by the number of death sentences alone. As Los’s case illustrates, witch hunts often had inconclusive outcomes, leaving the accused in a legal limbo that could last for years or even decades. Only one outcome was always the same: witch trials left behind a population of uprooted, dispossessed, and traumatized individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女巫审判的幸存者与近代德国对正义的追求
本文探讨了早期现代巫术审判对幸存者及其社区造成的创伤。起点是1520年代腾堡州一名寡妇玛格丽特·洛斯的案件,她被指控使用巫术。在遭受了残酷的酷刑之后,洛在三年后被暂时无罪释放。值得注意的是,她有足够的力量讲述自己的苦难,并将自己的案件提交到帝国最高法院。长期以来,关于女巫审判的历史文献一直因追求最“准确”的死亡人数而两极分化。然而,不能仅凭死刑判决的数量来评估猎巫的社会成本。正如洛斯的案例所表明的那样,政治迫害往往没有决定性的结果,让被告陷入法律困境,可能持续数年甚至数十年。只有一个结果总是一样的:女巫审判留下了一群背井离乡、被剥夺财产、精神受到创伤的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES
JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies publishes articles informed by historical inquiry and alert to issues raised by contemporary theoretical debate. The journal fosters rigorous investigation of historiographical representations of European and western Asian cultural forms from late antiquity to the seventeenth century. Its topics include art, literature, theater, music, philosophy, theology, and history, and it embraces material objects as well as texts; women as well as men; merchants, workers, and audiences as well as patrons; Jews and Muslims as well as Christians.
期刊最新文献
Intention and Interpretation, Now and Then Who Has Intention? Chaucer Studies and the Search for Meaning Making or Declaring Law? Legislative Intent and Privileged Speech in Anglo-Saxon England The Audacity of Judging Mind in Medieval England Scholastic Literary Theory: Intentionalism and the Desire for Stable Sense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1