Understanding and Interpreting Human Scoring

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Applied Measurement in Education Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/08957347.2020.1750402
Nancy Glazer, E. Wolfe
{"title":"Understanding and Interpreting Human Scoring","authors":"Nancy Glazer, E. Wolfe","doi":"10.1080/08957347.2020.1750402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This introductory article describes how constructed response scoring is carried out, particularly the rater monitoring processes and illustrates three potential designs for conducting rater monitoring in an operational scoring project. The introduction also presents a framework for interpreting research conducted by those who study the constructed response scoring process. That framework identifies three classifications of inputs (rater characteristics, response content, and rating context) which typically serve as independent variables in constructed response scoring research as well as three primary outcomes (rating quality, rating speed, and rater attitude) which serve as the dependent variables in those studies. Finally, we explain how each of the articles in this issue can be classified according to that framework.","PeriodicalId":51609,"journal":{"name":"Applied Measurement in Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"191 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08957347.2020.1750402","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Measurement in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1750402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This introductory article describes how constructed response scoring is carried out, particularly the rater monitoring processes and illustrates three potential designs for conducting rater monitoring in an operational scoring project. The introduction also presents a framework for interpreting research conducted by those who study the constructed response scoring process. That framework identifies three classifications of inputs (rater characteristics, response content, and rating context) which typically serve as independent variables in constructed response scoring research as well as three primary outcomes (rating quality, rating speed, and rater attitude) which serve as the dependent variables in those studies. Finally, we explain how each of the articles in this issue can be classified according to that framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解和解释人类评分
这篇介绍性文章描述了构建的反应评分是如何进行的,特别是评分者监测过程,并举例说明了在一个可操作的评分项目中进行评分者监测的三种潜在设计。引言部分还提出了一个解释研究的框架,这些研究是由那些研究构建反应评分过程的人进行的。该框架确定了三种输入分类(评分者特征、评分内容和评分背景),它们通常作为构建反应评分研究中的独立变量,以及三个主要结果(评分质量、评分速度和评分者态度),它们作为这些研究中的因变量。最后,我们将解释如何根据该框架对本期的每篇文章进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Because interaction between the domains of research and application is critical to the evaluation and improvement of new educational measurement practices, Applied Measurement in Education" prime objective is to improve communication between academicians and practitioners. To help bridge the gap between theory and practice, articles in this journal describe original research studies, innovative strategies for solving educational measurement problems, and integrative reviews of current approaches to contemporary measurement issues. Peer Review Policy: All review papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.
期刊最新文献
New Tests of Rater Drift in Trend Scoring Automated Scoring of Short-Answer Questions: A Progress Report Item and Test Characteristic Curves of Rank-2PL Models for Multidimensional Forced-Choice Questionnaires Impact of violating unidimensionality on Rasch calibration for mixed-format tests Can Adaptive Testing Improve Test-Taking Experience? A Case Study on Educational Survey Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1