Deception detection in repeated interviews: The effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts

IF 0.8 4区心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1002/jip.1561

Aleksandras Izotovas, Aldert Vrij, Lorraine Hope, Leif A. Strömwall, Pär A. Granhag, Samantha Mann

{"title":"Deception detection in repeated interviews: The effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts","authors":"Aleksandras Izotovas, Aldert Vrij, Lorraine Hope, Leif A. Strömwall, Pär A. Granhag, Samantha Mann","doi":"10.1002/jip.1561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we examined how different types of interviewing (eliciting more complete vs. less complete accounts) used in an interview conducted shortly after an event affected truth tellers' and liars' responses when they were interviewed again after a two-week delay. Participants (<i>n</i> = 80) were shown a mock intelligence operation video and told either the truth or lied about its contents in two interviews, immediately after watching the video, and after a two-week delay. In the immediate interview participants were instructed either to report everything they remembered, or asked spatial questions related to the event. In the delayed interview, all participants were asked to report everything. The differences between truth tellers and liars were slightly larger in the report everything than in the spatial questions condition. Results suggest that an immediate “report everything” instruction can aid to effectively discriminate between truthful and deceptive accounts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jip.1561","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jip.1561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this study, we examined how different types of interviewing (eliciting more complete vs. less complete accounts) used in an interview conducted shortly after an event affected truth tellers' and liars' responses when they were interviewed again after a two-week delay. Participants (n = 80) were shown a mock intelligence operation video and told either the truth or lied about its contents in two interviews, immediately after watching the video, and after a two-week delay. In the immediate interview participants were instructed either to report everything they remembered, or asked spatial questions related to the event. In the delayed interview, all participants were asked to report everything. The differences between truth tellers and liars were slightly larger in the report everything than in the spatial questions condition. Results suggest that an immediate “report everything” instruction can aid to effectively discriminate between truthful and deceptive accounts.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

重复访谈中的欺骗侦测:即时型提问对延迟陈述的影响

在这项研究中，我们研究了在事件发生后不久进行的采访中使用的不同类型的采访(引出更完整和更不完整的叙述)如何影响真话者和说谎者在两周后再次接受采访时的反应。参与者(n = 80)观看了一段模拟的情报行动视频，并在观看视频后立即和两周后的两次采访中对视频内容说真话或撒谎。在即时采访中，参与者被要求要么报告他们记得的所有事情，要么询问与事件相关的空间问题。在延迟的面试中，所有的参与者都被要求报告一切。说实话者和说谎者在“报告一切”问题上的差异略大于在空间问题条件下的差异。结果表明，立即“报告一切”的指令有助于有效区分真实和虚假的账户。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Multiple-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling (JIP-OP) is an international journal of behavioural science contributions to criminal and civil investigations, for researchers and practitioners, also exploring the legal and jurisprudential implications of psychological and related aspects of all forms of investigation. Investigative Psychology is rapidly developing worldwide. It is a newly established, interdisciplinary area of research and application, concerned with the systematic, scientific examination of all those aspects of psychology and the related behavioural and social sciences that may be relevant to criminal.