Quantitative Assessment of Microbial Contamination and Patterns of Public Behaviour with Used Toothbrushes: Implications of Storage and Replacement

Amreen Bashir, P. A. Lambert
{"title":"Quantitative Assessment of Microbial Contamination and Patterns of Public Behaviour with Used Toothbrushes: Implications of Storage and Replacement","authors":"Amreen Bashir, P. A. Lambert","doi":"10.31487/J.DOBCR.2021.02.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Toothbrushes can readily become contaminated with microbes during use and storage. They present a potential hazard of cross-contamination and subsequent infection.\nAims: To investigate the nature and level of microbial contamination of used toothbrushes and influence of participant lifestyle.\nMethods and Results: 103 used toothbrushes were donated, and microbial contents were determined by microbial culture and identification. 97% of toothbrushes revealed contamination. The microbial loads ranged from 0-1010 cfu/brush with median values of around 107, with Candida isolated in the highest levels. 90% of toothbrushes were stored in bathrooms presumably exposed to environmental contamination and 72% revealed the presence of enteric bacteria including Klebsiella, Serratia and Enterobacter. 50% of participants kept toothbrushes for >3 months and 40% retained toothbrushes for 4-6 months; microbial loads were fully established during the first three months of use and did not increase further with prolonged use. Only 57% of participants brushed their teeth twice a day and 41% brushed once a day.\nConclusion: Used toothbrushes are heavily contaminated and the presence of potentially pathogenic microorganisms constitutes a potential health risk.\nSignificance and Impact of Study: There is an under-recognised risk of cross-contamination/infection, especially when multiple users store toothbrushes in close contact. Guidance on toothbrush age, brushing frequency and storage is not being followed. Further education is required to improve public awareness.","PeriodicalId":72781,"journal":{"name":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/J.DOBCR.2021.02.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Toothbrushes can readily become contaminated with microbes during use and storage. They present a potential hazard of cross-contamination and subsequent infection. Aims: To investigate the nature and level of microbial contamination of used toothbrushes and influence of participant lifestyle. Methods and Results: 103 used toothbrushes were donated, and microbial contents were determined by microbial culture and identification. 97% of toothbrushes revealed contamination. The microbial loads ranged from 0-1010 cfu/brush with median values of around 107, with Candida isolated in the highest levels. 90% of toothbrushes were stored in bathrooms presumably exposed to environmental contamination and 72% revealed the presence of enteric bacteria including Klebsiella, Serratia and Enterobacter. 50% of participants kept toothbrushes for >3 months and 40% retained toothbrushes for 4-6 months; microbial loads were fully established during the first three months of use and did not increase further with prolonged use. Only 57% of participants brushed their teeth twice a day and 41% brushed once a day. Conclusion: Used toothbrushes are heavily contaminated and the presence of potentially pathogenic microorganisms constitutes a potential health risk. Significance and Impact of Study: There is an under-recognised risk of cross-contamination/infection, especially when multiple users store toothbrushes in close contact. Guidance on toothbrush age, brushing frequency and storage is not being followed. Further education is required to improve public awareness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用过的牙刷对微生物污染和公众行为模式的定量评估:储存和更换的意义
简介:牙刷在使用和储存过程中很容易被微生物污染。它们存在交叉污染和随后感染的潜在危险。目的:调查二手牙刷的微生物污染性质和水平,以及参与者生活方式的影响。方法与结果:捐赠103支使用过的牙刷,通过微生物培养鉴定方法测定牙刷中的微生物含量。97%的牙刷被污染。微生物负荷范围为0-1010 cfu/刷,中值约为107,分离的念珠菌水平最高。90%的牙刷存放在可能受到环境污染的浴室中,72%的牙刷显示存在肠道细菌,包括克雷伯菌、沙雷氏菌和肠杆菌。50%的参与者保留牙刷超过3个月,40%的参与者保留4-6个月;微生物负荷在使用的前三个月内完全确定,并且不会随着使用时间的延长而进一步增加。只有57%的参与者每天刷牙两次,41%的参与者每天刷一次。结论:二手牙刷受到严重污染,潜在致病微生物的存在构成了潜在的健康风险。研究的意义和影响:交叉污染/感染的风险被低估,尤其是当多个使用者密切接触存放牙刷时。没有遵循关于牙刷年龄、刷牙频率和储存的指导。需要进一步教育以提高公众意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role Of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Diagnosis of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Scoping Review Evaluation of Socket Preservation Using Collagen Plug and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Extracted Sockets of Mandibular Molars: A Split Mouth Study Sublingual Swelling Masquerades a Ranula: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Does Submucosal Placentrex® Injection Hasten the Soft Tissue Healing in Mandibular Third Molar Impaction Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Split-Mouth Study Finding the Way Back Home: Report of 2 Cases of Oral Metastasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1