Exploring the relationship between technological leadership self-efficacy of primary school administrators and 21st century skills

Q3 Social Sciences Participatory Educational Research Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI:10.17275/per.23.57.10.4
Kazım Doğu, Atila Yildirim
{"title":"Exploring the relationship between technological leadership self-efficacy of primary school administrators and 21st century skills","authors":"Kazım Doğu, Atila Yildirim","doi":"10.17275/per.23.57.10.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the relationship between primary school administrators' technological leadership self-efficacy and 21st century skills. Employing descriptive (survey) research method, the opinions of the primary school administrators working in the state primary schools in the districts of Konya were examined. The Education Administrators Technological Leadership Self-Efficacy Scale and the 21st Century Skills and Competences Scale Directed at Teaching Candidates were administered. In order to analyse the data collected in the study, in which 272 questionnaire responses were collected, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, percentage, t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and correlation test and Cohen's d test were performed. The results revealed that primary school administrators' perceptions of technological leadership self-efficacy turned out to be at adequate level. It was also seen that there was no significant difference in terms of technological leadership levels of administrators in line with gender and professional experience. It was seen that school administrators' consider 21st century skills important. The results also indicated that there was no significant difference between primary school administrators' perception of 21st century skills and gender, experience, and age. In addition, there is a significant difference between primary school administrators' perceptions of 21st century skills and the variables of position and educational status. The findings also showed that there is a positive, moderate, and significant relationship between the sum and dimensions of primary school administrators' technological leadership behaviours and the sum and dimensions of 21st century skills.","PeriodicalId":36886,"journal":{"name":"Participatory Educational Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Participatory Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.57.10.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between primary school administrators' technological leadership self-efficacy and 21st century skills. Employing descriptive (survey) research method, the opinions of the primary school administrators working in the state primary schools in the districts of Konya were examined. The Education Administrators Technological Leadership Self-Efficacy Scale and the 21st Century Skills and Competences Scale Directed at Teaching Candidates were administered. In order to analyse the data collected in the study, in which 272 questionnaire responses were collected, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, percentage, t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and correlation test and Cohen's d test were performed. The results revealed that primary school administrators' perceptions of technological leadership self-efficacy turned out to be at adequate level. It was also seen that there was no significant difference in terms of technological leadership levels of administrators in line with gender and professional experience. It was seen that school administrators' consider 21st century skills important. The results also indicated that there was no significant difference between primary school administrators' perception of 21st century skills and gender, experience, and age. In addition, there is a significant difference between primary school administrators' perceptions of 21st century skills and the variables of position and educational status. The findings also showed that there is a positive, moderate, and significant relationship between the sum and dimensions of primary school administrators' technological leadership behaviours and the sum and dimensions of 21st century skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学管理者技术领导自我效能感与21世纪技能的关系研究
摘要本研究旨在探讨小学行政人员科技领导自我效能感与21世纪技能的关系。采用描述性(调查)研究方法,对科尼亚各区公立小学管理人员的意见进行了调查。采用教育行政人员技术领导自我效能感量表和面向教师候选人的21世纪技能与能力量表。本研究共收集问卷272份,采用算术平均值、标准差、百分比、t检验、单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、相关检验和Cohen’s d检验对数据进行分析。结果显示,小学管理人员对技术领导自我效能感的认知处于适当水平。还可以看到,行政人员的技术领导水平在性别和专业经验方面没有显著差异。可以看出,学校管理者认为21世纪技能很重要。小学管理者对21世纪技能的认知在性别、经验和年龄上均无显著差异。此外,小学管理者对21世纪技能的认知与职位和教育地位变量之间存在显著差异。研究还发现,小学管理者技术领导行为的总和和维度与21世纪技能的总和和维度之间存在正、中、显著的相关关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Participatory Educational Research
Participatory Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
期刊最新文献
Determination of Teacher Qualifications from the Perspective of Stakeholders: Rubric Development Study Augmented Reality in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review Fostering Safe Schools: Empowering Educators and Parents in the Fight Against Violence in Early Childhood Education Setting The Effect of Mathematics Teaching with Mobile Augmented Reality Technology on Secondary School Students’ Attitudes and Academic Achievements The Effect of Computer-Supported Stem Applications on Secondary Students' Achievement and Computational Thinking Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1