Modelling the importance of collaborative culture and its dimensions for supply chain collaboration: a necessary condition analysis

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS RAUSP Management Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1108/rausp-05-2022-0153
Innocent Senyo Kwasi Acquah
{"title":"Modelling the importance of collaborative culture and its dimensions for supply chain collaboration: a necessary condition analysis","authors":"Innocent Senyo Kwasi Acquah","doi":"10.1108/rausp-05-2022-0153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper assumes necessity rather than sufficiency logic to model the relationship between collaborative culture and supply chain collaboration as triangular rather than linear. Specifically, this study aims to determine whether overall collaborative culture and its dimensions (i.e. collectivism, long-term orientation, power symmetry and uncertainty avoidance) are necessary for supply chain collaboration and the minimum levels of overall collaborative culture and its dimensions that are required for high levels of supply chain collaboration.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBased on the literature, collaborative culture and its four dimensions, namely, collectivism, long-term orientation, power symmetry and uncertainty avoidance, were modelled as conditions having supply chain collaboration as their outcome. The study used the necessary condition analysis to test the triangular relationships between the conditions and the outcome among a sample of firms (N = 166) in the downstream petroleum sector.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results revealed that collaborative culture and its dimensions are necessary conditions for supply chain collaboration, and that high levels of collaboration are possible, although not guaranteed when at least a basic level of collaborative culture or its dimensions are present. Hence, different levels of supply chain collaboration require firms to have different levels of collectivism, long-term orientation, power symmetry and uncertainty avoidance. Thus, at 30% supply chain collaboration, only overall collaborative culture is necessary.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nA significant limitation of this research is that, although several antecedents of supply chain collaboration exist, this study explored only the cultural antecedents of supply chain collaboration.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe dimensions of collaborative culture are necessary but not sufficient for supply chain collaboration. Therefore, managers should adopt a holistic approach to investment in a collaborative culture, as an over-investment in any of the dimensions may not compensate for an under-investment in the others.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAs one of the first studies to use necessity rather than sufficiency logic to test the relationship between collaborative culture and supply chain collaboration, this research unearthed the non-linear (triangular) relationship between the constructs. It contributes to understanding how collaborative culture and its dimensions serve as bottleneck conditions constraining supply chain collaboration.\n","PeriodicalId":43400,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-05-2022-0153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper assumes necessity rather than sufficiency logic to model the relationship between collaborative culture and supply chain collaboration as triangular rather than linear. Specifically, this study aims to determine whether overall collaborative culture and its dimensions (i.e. collectivism, long-term orientation, power symmetry and uncertainty avoidance) are necessary for supply chain collaboration and the minimum levels of overall collaborative culture and its dimensions that are required for high levels of supply chain collaboration. Design/methodology/approach Based on the literature, collaborative culture and its four dimensions, namely, collectivism, long-term orientation, power symmetry and uncertainty avoidance, were modelled as conditions having supply chain collaboration as their outcome. The study used the necessary condition analysis to test the triangular relationships between the conditions and the outcome among a sample of firms (N = 166) in the downstream petroleum sector. Findings The results revealed that collaborative culture and its dimensions are necessary conditions for supply chain collaboration, and that high levels of collaboration are possible, although not guaranteed when at least a basic level of collaborative culture or its dimensions are present. Hence, different levels of supply chain collaboration require firms to have different levels of collectivism, long-term orientation, power symmetry and uncertainty avoidance. Thus, at 30% supply chain collaboration, only overall collaborative culture is necessary. Research limitations/implications A significant limitation of this research is that, although several antecedents of supply chain collaboration exist, this study explored only the cultural antecedents of supply chain collaboration. Practical implications The dimensions of collaborative culture are necessary but not sufficient for supply chain collaboration. Therefore, managers should adopt a holistic approach to investment in a collaborative culture, as an over-investment in any of the dimensions may not compensate for an under-investment in the others. Originality/value As one of the first studies to use necessity rather than sufficiency logic to test the relationship between collaborative culture and supply chain collaboration, this research unearthed the non-linear (triangular) relationship between the constructs. It contributes to understanding how collaborative culture and its dimensions serve as bottleneck conditions constraining supply chain collaboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作文化的重要性及其维度对供应链合作的建模:必要条件分析
本文假设了必要性而非充分性逻辑,将协作文化与供应链协作之间的关系建模为三角形而不是线性关系。具体而言,本研究旨在确定供应链协作是否需要整体协作文化及其维度(即集体主义、长期导向、权力对称和不确定性规避),以及供应链高水平协作所需的整体协作文化及其维度的最低水平。基于文献,协作文化及其四个维度,即集体主义、长期导向、权力对称和不确定性规避,被建模为以供应链协作为结果的条件。该研究使用必要条件分析来检验下游石油部门公司样本(N = 166)中条件与结果之间的三角关系。研究结果表明,协作文化及其维度是供应链协作的必要条件,并且当至少存在基本水平的协作文化或其维度时,高水平的协作是可能的。因此,不同层次的供应链协作要求企业具有不同程度的集体主义、长期导向、权力对称和不确定性规避。因此,在30%的供应链协作中,只有整体协作文化是必要的。研究的局限性/启示本研究的一个显著的局限性是,虽然存在几个供应链协作的前因,但本研究只探讨了供应链协作的文化前因。实际意义协作文化的维度对于供应链协作是必要的,但不是充分的。因此,管理者应该采用一种全面的方法来投资协作文化,因为在任何一个维度上的过度投资都可能无法弥补在其他维度上的投资不足。作为最早使用必要性逻辑而非充分性逻辑来检验协作文化与供应链协作关系的研究之一,本研究揭示了这两个构式之间的非线性(三角形)关系。它有助于理解协作文化及其维度如何作为限制供应链协作的瓶颈条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring off-chain voting and blockchain in decentralized autonomous organizations Entrepreneurial intentions and the role of educational and social support: do the self-efficacy and the theory of planned behavior variables matter? Corporate reputation in Brazil: do board characteristics matter? Motivation for women’s football: a competing scales study Understanding the role of physical trial for good shopping decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1