Comments on “The New Jewish Question”

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pli.2021.26
F. Devji
{"title":"Comments on “The New Jewish Question”","authors":"F. Devji","doi":"10.1017/pli.2021.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If the “old” Jewish Question had asked how a Jew could be a citizen, the “new” one posed by Daniel Boyarin’s remarkable and courageous article asks how nationality can exist without a state. Striking about this formulation is the distance it marks from the European debates about emancipation and assimilation that had defined its predecessor. Boyarin’s context is not continental but imperial, taking into account Jews in colonized lands as much as the historical relationship between Europe and empire. As Hannah Arendt was the first to argue in The Origins of Totalitarianism, this relationship possessed an outward trajectory that went through anti-Semitism and an inward return by way of genocide.1","PeriodicalId":42913,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","volume":"9 1","pages":"85 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2021.26","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If the “old” Jewish Question had asked how a Jew could be a citizen, the “new” one posed by Daniel Boyarin’s remarkable and courageous article asks how nationality can exist without a state. Striking about this formulation is the distance it marks from the European debates about emancipation and assimilation that had defined its predecessor. Boyarin’s context is not continental but imperial, taking into account Jews in colonized lands as much as the historical relationship between Europe and empire. As Hannah Arendt was the first to argue in The Origins of Totalitarianism, this relationship possessed an outward trajectory that went through anti-Semitism and an inward return by way of genocide.1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评《新犹太问题》
如果说“老”犹太人问题问的是犹太人如何成为公民,那么丹尼尔·博亚林(Daniel Boyarin)那篇杰出而勇敢的文章提出的“新”问题则是,民族如何在没有国家的情况下存在。引人注目的是,这一提法标志着它与欧洲关于解放和同化的辩论之间的距离,而欧洲关于解放和同化的辩论定义了它的前身。博亚林的背景不是欧洲大陆,而是帝国,他既考虑到了欧洲与帝国之间的历史关系,也考虑到了殖民土地上的犹太人。正如汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)在《极权主义的起源》(the Origins of Totalitarianism)一书中第一个提出的那样,这种关系具有一条通过反犹主义向外发展的轨迹,以及一条通过种族灭绝向内回归的轨迹
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Academia, Activism, and Popular Consciousness: A Response to Freedom Inc. Modes of Cosmopolitanism in Waguih Ghali’s Egypt in Beer in the Snooker Club Freedom Inc.: Gendered Capitalism in New Indian Literature and Culture: A Response In Other Theories: Colonial Reason, Language, And Literature in Ankhi Mukherjee’s Unseen City Matsotsi: The Migrant Detective and the Postcolonial State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1