Occurrence of coliphage in effluent: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Kaedra R. Jones , Sorina Eftim , Alexander J. Lindahl , Steven Black , Sharon P. Nappier
{"title":"Occurrence of coliphage in effluent: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis","authors":"Kaedra R. Jones ,&nbsp;Sorina Eftim ,&nbsp;Alexander J. Lindahl ,&nbsp;Steven Black ,&nbsp;Sharon P. Nappier","doi":"10.1016/j.heha.2022.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Studies have illustrated that wastewater treatment methods targeting bacteria do not remove all types of viruses and available epidemiological studies indicate bacteria concentrations may not always be predictive of viral illnesses associated with recreational water exposure. To address these challenges, coliphages have been proposed as an indicator of fecal contamination in recreational water. When compared to traditional fecal indicator bacteria, coliphages exhibit a longer persistence in the environment. The persistence of coliphages in the environment and through wastewater treatment more closely resembles that of pathogenic viruses. We conducted a systematic literature search of peer-reviewed publications to identify coliphage density data (somatic [SC] and male-specific [MSC]) in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent categorized as primary, secondary, tertiary treated, or disinfected. Scope, study quality, and data availability were included as literature review inclusion criteria. An analysis was conducted to estimate the coliphage densities for specific treatment types within each respective WWTP effluent category. Densities of MSC and SC in influent were significantly higher when compared to densities of MSC and SC in effluent subjected to secondary treatment using biological treatment processes both with and without nutrient removal, tertiary treatment using either a treatment pond or a phosphate removal process, or disinfection using either chlorine, UV, or a combination of both UV and chlorine. Distributions of coliphage in various wastewater effluents will be useful for evaluating the efficacy of treatment processes and disinfectants in future microbial risk assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73269,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049222000149/pdfft?md5=a3aa19ad0e6b4fdbbd6d2c048702f444&pid=1-s2.0-S2773049222000149-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049222000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have illustrated that wastewater treatment methods targeting bacteria do not remove all types of viruses and available epidemiological studies indicate bacteria concentrations may not always be predictive of viral illnesses associated with recreational water exposure. To address these challenges, coliphages have been proposed as an indicator of fecal contamination in recreational water. When compared to traditional fecal indicator bacteria, coliphages exhibit a longer persistence in the environment. The persistence of coliphages in the environment and through wastewater treatment more closely resembles that of pathogenic viruses. We conducted a systematic literature search of peer-reviewed publications to identify coliphage density data (somatic [SC] and male-specific [MSC]) in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent categorized as primary, secondary, tertiary treated, or disinfected. Scope, study quality, and data availability were included as literature review inclusion criteria. An analysis was conducted to estimate the coliphage densities for specific treatment types within each respective WWTP effluent category. Densities of MSC and SC in influent were significantly higher when compared to densities of MSC and SC in effluent subjected to secondary treatment using biological treatment processes both with and without nutrient removal, tertiary treatment using either a treatment pond or a phosphate removal process, or disinfection using either chlorine, UV, or a combination of both UV and chlorine. Distributions of coliphage in various wastewater effluents will be useful for evaluating the efficacy of treatment processes and disinfectants in future microbial risk assessments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流出物中噬菌体的发生:系统的文献回顾和荟萃分析
研究表明,针对细菌的废水处理方法并不能去除所有类型的病毒,现有的流行病学研究表明,细菌浓度可能并不总是预测与娱乐用水接触相关的病毒性疾病。为了应对这些挑战,有人提出将噬菌体作为娱乐用水中粪便污染的指标。与传统的粪便指示细菌相比,噬菌体在环境中表现出更长的持久性。噬菌体在环境中和通过废水处理的持久性更接近于致病性病毒。我们对同行评审的出版物进行了系统的文献检索,以确定污水处理厂(WWTP)废水中按一级、二级、三级处理或消毒分类的噬菌体密度数据(体细胞[SC]和男性特异性[MSC])。文献综述纳入标准包括范围、研究质量和数据可得性。进行了一项分析,以估计在每个各自的污水处理厂出水类别中特定处理类型的噬菌体密度。进水中MSC和SC的密度明显高于使用有或没有营养物去除的生物处理工艺进行二级处理的出水中MSC和SC的密度,使用处理池或磷酸盐去除工艺进行三级处理,或使用氯、紫外线或紫外线和氯的组合进行消毒。在未来的微生物风险评估中,各种废水出水中噬菌体的分布将有助于评估处理工艺和消毒剂的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hygiene and environmental health advances
Hygiene and environmental health advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Occupational chemical safety and management: A case study to identify best practices for sustainable advancement of Bangladesh Black box analysis with linear regression on global warming Removal mechanism of decabromodiphenyl ether in soil by Cu/Fe nanoparticles Expansion of a versatile pathogen: Clostridioides difficile From human cohorts to plant cohorts: The potential of plants in epidemiological studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1