Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES Fashion and Textiles Pub Date : 2022-08-05 DOI:10.1186/s40691-022-00296-7
Tamer Eren, Tuğba Danışan, Ayşegül Deringöz, Güler Aksüt
{"title":"Comparison and selection of patient follow-up systems for covid-19 pandemic patients","authors":"Tamer Eren,&nbsp;Tuğba Danışan,&nbsp;Ayşegül Deringöz,&nbsp;Güler Aksüt","doi":"10.1186/s40691-022-00296-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People have struggled with many infectious diseases throughout history. Today, the Covid-19 is being fought. One of the most important things for people who have or are at risk of getting Covid-19 is social isolation. Many countries resort to different ways to ensure social isolation. For this, remote patient monitoring systems have been developed. In this study, the problem of the selection of Covid-19 remote patient monitoring systems is discussed. Seven Wearable Health Technology (WHT) products were evaluated with a total of 10 criteria, including the important symptoms used in the patient tracking systems. The weights of 10 criteria determined by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method were calculated, and these weights were used in the solution of The Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS) methods. WHT products were compared. As a result, the most appropriate patient follow-up system was determined. This study generates differences in terms of evaluating seven different products and ten criteria in total with MCDM methods. A more comprehensive evaluation has been made in the literature than the studies in this field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":555,"journal":{"name":"Fashion and Textiles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://fashionandtextiles.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40691-022-00296-7","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fashion and Textiles","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40691-022-00296-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

People have struggled with many infectious diseases throughout history. Today, the Covid-19 is being fought. One of the most important things for people who have or are at risk of getting Covid-19 is social isolation. Many countries resort to different ways to ensure social isolation. For this, remote patient monitoring systems have been developed. In this study, the problem of the selection of Covid-19 remote patient monitoring systems is discussed. Seven Wearable Health Technology (WHT) products were evaluated with a total of 10 criteria, including the important symptoms used in the patient tracking systems. The weights of 10 criteria determined by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method were calculated, and these weights were used in the solution of The Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS) methods. WHT products were compared. As a result, the most appropriate patient follow-up system was determined. This study generates differences in terms of evaluating seven different products and ten criteria in total with MCDM methods. A more comprehensive evaluation has been made in the literature than the studies in this field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎患者随访系统的比较与选择
纵观历史,人们一直在与许多传染病作斗争。今天,我们正在抗击新冠肺炎。对于已经感染或有感染Covid-19风险的人来说,最重要的事情之一是社会隔离。许多国家采取不同的方式来确保社会隔离。为此,开发了远程患者监测系统。本研究讨论了Covid-19患者远程监测系统的选择问题。7种可穿戴健康技术(WHT)产品共采用10项标准进行评估,包括患者跟踪系统中使用的重要症状。计算了层次分析法(AHP)确定的10个指标的权重,并将这些权重用于求解富集评价偏好排序组织法(PROMETHEE)和理想解相似性排序偏好法(TOPSIS)。比较WHT产品。从而确定了最合适的患者随访制度。本研究产生的差异,在评估七个不同的产品和十个标准,共与MCDM方法。文献的评价比本领域的研究更为全面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fashion and Textiles
Fashion and Textiles Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Fashion and Textiles aims to advance knowledge and to seek new perspectives in the fashion and textiles industry worldwide. We welcome original research articles, reviews, case studies, book reviews and letters to the editor. The scope of the journal includes the following four technical research divisions: Textile Science and Technology: Textile Material Science and Technology; Dyeing and Finishing; Smart and Intelligent Textiles Clothing Science and Technology: Physiology of Clothing/Textile Products; Protective clothing ; Smart and Intelligent clothing; Sportswear; Mass customization ; Apparel manufacturing Economics of Clothing and Textiles/Fashion Business: Management of the Clothing and Textiles Industry; Merchandising; Retailing; Fashion Marketing; Consumer Behavior; Socio-psychology of Fashion Fashion Design and Cultural Study on Fashion: Aesthetic Aspects of Fashion Product or Design Process; Textiles/Clothing/Fashion Design; Fashion Trend; History of Fashion; Costume or Dress; Fashion Theory; Fashion journalism; Fashion exhibition.
期刊最新文献
Opportunities and challenges of smart technology for small independent fashion retailers: a reflexive thematic analysis using the technology-organization-environment framework Date estimation of fabrication and repair of Color garments encouragement banner Enhanced content-based fashion recommendation system through deep ensemble classifier with transfer learning Functional performance of a novel compression top for female throwing athletes The neighborhood advantage: exploring the impact of negotiation costs on transaction satisfaction in local second-hand trading platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1