Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse

IF 1.1 Q2 AREA STUDIES Journal of Contemporary European Research Pub Date : 2020-12-18 DOI:10.30950/jcer.v16i3.1090
Andreas Amerkamp, Paul Stephenson
{"title":"Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse","authors":"Andreas Amerkamp, Paul Stephenson","doi":"10.30950/jcer.v16i3.1090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2014, newly elected Commission President Juncker pushed to create the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the aim of creating jobs and stimulating growth. With guarantees offered by the fund and the involvement of the European Investment Bank, the plan was to use €21 billion to leverage €315 billion of investment in the European economy. The EFSI legislative process was very fast with legislation emerging in just a year, with the first EFSI regulation appearing in mid-2015. Using policy frame analysis, this article zooms in on the discursive patterns of the European Commission, European Parliament and Council, expecting to find transport infrastructure a key theme given the low investment levels in this sector after the financial crisis in 2008. Analysing key documents at two periods in time, and drawing on interviews with officials, it explores the arguments used to make the case for EFSI and how these changes over time, leading to the extension of EFSI through an amended regulation in December 2017. In so doing, it shows the strategic positions of the institutions during Agenda-setting for EFSI. Moreover, he article explores questions of legitimacy and accountability. It reveals how key events including the Paris Agreement on climate change (December 2015) and Brexit referendum (June 2016) increased the persuasiveness of its framing.","PeriodicalId":44985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i3.1090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 2014, newly elected Commission President Juncker pushed to create the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the aim of creating jobs and stimulating growth. With guarantees offered by the fund and the involvement of the European Investment Bank, the plan was to use €21 billion to leverage €315 billion of investment in the European economy. The EFSI legislative process was very fast with legislation emerging in just a year, with the first EFSI regulation appearing in mid-2015. Using policy frame analysis, this article zooms in on the discursive patterns of the European Commission, European Parliament and Council, expecting to find transport infrastructure a key theme given the low investment levels in this sector after the financial crisis in 2008. Analysing key documents at two periods in time, and drawing on interviews with officials, it explores the arguments used to make the case for EFSI and how these changes over time, leading to the extension of EFSI through an amended regulation in December 2017. In so doing, it shows the strategic positions of the institutions during Agenda-setting for EFSI. Moreover, he article explores questions of legitimacy and accountability. It reveals how key events including the Paris Agreement on climate change (December 2015) and Brexit referendum (June 2016) increased the persuasiveness of its framing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建欧洲战略投资基金:欧盟制度话语的比较分析
2014年,新当选的欧盟委员会主席容克推动创建欧洲战略投资基金(EFSI),旨在创造就业机会和刺激经济增长。在imf提供担保和欧洲投资银行(European Investment Bank)的参与下,该计划将用210亿欧元撬动欧洲经济中3150亿欧元的投资。EFSI立法过程非常迅速,仅在一年内就出现了立法,2015年中期出现了第一个EFSI法规。本文利用政策框架分析,聚焦于欧盟委员会、欧洲议会和理事会的话语模式,期望发现交通基础设施是2008年金融危机后该领域投资水平较低的一个关键主题。该报告分析了两个时期的关键文件,并借鉴了对官员的采访,探讨了用于支持EFSI的论据,以及这些论据如何随着时间的推移而变化,从而导致EFSI通过2017年12月修订的法规得到扩展。在这样做时,它显示了各机构在为EFSI制定议程时的战略立场。此外,这篇文章还探讨了合法性和问责制的问题。它揭示了包括巴黎气候变化协定(2015年12月)和英国脱欧公投(2016年6月)在内的关键事件如何增加了其框架的说服力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decolonising EU Trade Relations with the Global Souths? Disrupting and Re-imagining European Studies: towards a More Diverse and Inclusive Discipline Moving from EU-centrisms: Lessons from the Polycrisis for EU studies and Global South Regionalism Rethinking African-European Scientific Cooperation: The Case of the Platform for African-European Studies Unlearning and Relearning Europe: Theoretical and Practical Approaches to Decolonising European Studies Curricula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1