Is the Pope’s Hope Being Dashed?

George C. Nche, Lilly Nortjé-Meyer, Julia Blanc, K. I. Uwaegbute
{"title":"Is the Pope’s Hope Being Dashed?","authors":"George C. Nche, Lilly Nortjé-Meyer, Julia Blanc, K. I. Uwaegbute","doi":"10.1163/15685357-tat00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n At the height of the deadlocks around global climate change discussions and negotiations, Pope Francis made entry with a morally captivating encyclical letter (Laudato Si) on the Care for Creation. Using a scoping review approach, we focused on a five-year-old body of research around the encyclical, identifying impacts as well as other issues arising from the scholarly engagements. Here, 150 English written publications from 2015 to 2020 were reviewed. The majority of these texts (80 %) addressed the significance and vision of Laudato Si. The rest were distributed between those that presented criticisms of the letter (11 %) and those that gauged the impact of the letter on environmental worldviews (9 %). Second, the climate change (technological advancement)-poverty (climate justice) connection, which is the encyclical’s major focus, remains contested and inconclusive as some critics have rather found and presented a positive relationship between these variables. Third, Laudato Si has recorded a mixed impact. To some people, it has not only led to increased credibility of the Pope but also the increased concern for climate change, whereas to others, it has led to a decreased credibility of the Pope as well as a lessened concern for climate change. Fourth, studies gauging Laudato Si’s impact is geographically biased as they have largely focused on the US and Europe while neglecting other regions especially Africa. The implications of these findings for research and policy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43776,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews-Global Religions Culture and Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews-Global Religions Culture and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685357-tat00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the height of the deadlocks around global climate change discussions and negotiations, Pope Francis made entry with a morally captivating encyclical letter (Laudato Si) on the Care for Creation. Using a scoping review approach, we focused on a five-year-old body of research around the encyclical, identifying impacts as well as other issues arising from the scholarly engagements. Here, 150 English written publications from 2015 to 2020 were reviewed. The majority of these texts (80 %) addressed the significance and vision of Laudato Si. The rest were distributed between those that presented criticisms of the letter (11 %) and those that gauged the impact of the letter on environmental worldviews (9 %). Second, the climate change (technological advancement)-poverty (climate justice) connection, which is the encyclical’s major focus, remains contested and inconclusive as some critics have rather found and presented a positive relationship between these variables. Third, Laudato Si has recorded a mixed impact. To some people, it has not only led to increased credibility of the Pope but also the increased concern for climate change, whereas to others, it has led to a decreased credibility of the Pope as well as a lessened concern for climate change. Fourth, studies gauging Laudato Si’s impact is geographically biased as they have largely focused on the US and Europe while neglecting other regions especially Africa. The implications of these findings for research and policy are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教皇的希望破灭了吗?
在围绕全球气候变化的讨论和谈判陷入僵局的高峰时期,教皇方济各(Pope Francis)发表了一封关于关爱受造界的通谕(Laudato Si),在道德上引人入胜。使用范围审查方法,我们专注于围绕通谕进行了五年的研究,确定了影响以及学术活动产生的其他问题。本文对2015年至2020年的150篇英文书面出版物进行了综述。这些文本中的大多数(80% %)论述了《愿祢受赞颂》的意义和愿景。其余的则分布在对信提出批评的人(11% %)和评估信对环境世界观影响的人(9% %)之间。其次,气候变化(技术进步)与贫困(气候正义)之间的联系,这是通谕的主要焦点,仍然存在争议和不确定性,因为一些批评者发现并提出了这些变量之间的积极关系。第三,“赞颂”带来了复杂的影响。对一些人来说,这不仅增加了教皇的可信度,而且增加了对气候变化的关注,而对另一些人来说,这导致教皇的可信度下降,以及对气候变化的关注减少。第四,衡量Laudato Si影响的研究存在地域偏见,因为它们主要关注美国和欧洲,而忽略了其他地区,尤其是非洲。讨论了这些发现对研究和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Rituals in Weather Lands Interpreting and Responding to Pandemics in Philosophical Traditions and Films of India Christliche Umweltethik: Grundlagen und zentrale Herausforderungen. [Christian Environmental Ethics: Foundations and Central Challenges] , by Markus Vogt Healing Nature Reimagining the Istanbul Encampment of 2013
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1