S. J. Stroessner, Nicholas P. Alt, Isabel Ghisolfi, Prianka D. Koya
{"title":"Race and the Mental Representation of Individuals Diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant Disorder: Implications for Diagnosis","authors":"S. J. Stroessner, Nicholas P. Alt, Isabel Ghisolfi, Prianka D. Koya","doi":"10.1521/jscp.2023.42.4.365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This research investigates the possible role of racial and gender stereotypes in diagnosing children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). ODD is diagnosed more readily in boys and Black children, although the factors producing differential diagnosis rates are unclear. The authors conducted six studies investigating the possibility that overlap between racial and gender stereotypes with ODD diagnostic criteria might contribute to gaps in its judged prevalence across groups. Method: Participants completed reverse correlation procedures to determine whether mental representations of children expected versus unexpected to be diagnosed with ODD differed in facial characteristics. Separate participants viewed these images and judged the likelihood that each person depicted had been diagnosed with ODD. Results: Classification images (CIs) showed that the children selected as having ODD appeared more prototypically Black in facial appearance than children not chosen as having ODD. No differences emerged in the gendered appearance of the two group-level CIs. Judged rates of ODD were higher for the children who appeared to be Black. However, diagnostic judgments of clinical trainees and practitioners were unaffected by appearance factors, suggesting that formal clinical training might attenuate the influence of stereotypes on judgment. Discussion: These results indicate that an overlap in Black stereotypes and diagnostic criteria for ODD might contribute to elevated diagnosis of ODD in African American children.","PeriodicalId":48202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2023.42.4.365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This research investigates the possible role of racial and gender stereotypes in diagnosing children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). ODD is diagnosed more readily in boys and Black children, although the factors producing differential diagnosis rates are unclear. The authors conducted six studies investigating the possibility that overlap between racial and gender stereotypes with ODD diagnostic criteria might contribute to gaps in its judged prevalence across groups. Method: Participants completed reverse correlation procedures to determine whether mental representations of children expected versus unexpected to be diagnosed with ODD differed in facial characteristics. Separate participants viewed these images and judged the likelihood that each person depicted had been diagnosed with ODD. Results: Classification images (CIs) showed that the children selected as having ODD appeared more prototypically Black in facial appearance than children not chosen as having ODD. No differences emerged in the gendered appearance of the two group-level CIs. Judged rates of ODD were higher for the children who appeared to be Black. However, diagnostic judgments of clinical trainees and practitioners were unaffected by appearance factors, suggesting that formal clinical training might attenuate the influence of stereotypes on judgment. Discussion: These results indicate that an overlap in Black stereotypes and diagnostic criteria for ODD might contribute to elevated diagnosis of ODD in African American children.
期刊介绍:
This journal is devoted to the application of theory and research from social psychology toward the better understanding of human adaptation and adjustment, including both the alleviation of psychological problems and distress (e.g., psychopathology) and the enhancement of psychological well-being among the psychologically healthy. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to) traditionally defined psychopathology (e.g., depression), common emotional and behavioral problems in living (e.g., conflicts in close relationships), the enhancement of subjective well-being, and the processes of psychological change in everyday life (e.g., self-regulation) and professional settings (e.g., psychotherapy and counseling). Articles reporting the results of theory-driven empirical research are given priority, but theoretical articles, review articles, clinical case studies, and essays on professional issues are also welcome. Articles describing the development of new scales (personality or otherwise) or the revision of existing scales are not appropriate for this journal.